open access

Vol 94, No 12 (2023)
Research paper
Published online: 2023-07-11
Get Citation

Retained products of conception — a retrospective analysis of 200 cases of surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum

Petr Velebil1, Lucie Hajkova Hympanova1, Hynek Herman1, Michal Emingr1, Petr Krepelka1, Jiri Hanacek1
·
Pubmed: 37435917
·
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(12):967-971.
Affiliations
  1. 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

open access

Vol 94, No 12 (2023)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2023-07-11

Abstract

Objectives: Postpartum retained products of conception are a relatively rare diagnosis occurring in approximately 1% of cases after spontaneous deliveries and abortions. The most common clinical signs are bleeding and abdominal pain. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs and ultrasound examination.
Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 200 surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum obtained in 64 months. We correlated the method and accuracy of diagnosis with definitive histological findings.
Results: During 64 months, we performed 23 412 deliveries. The frequency of procedures for diagnosis of retained products of conception (RPOC) was 0.85%. Most (73.5%) of the D&C were performed within six weeks of delivery. Histologically, the correct diagnosis was confirmed in 62% (chorion + amniotic envelope). There was interestingly lower concordance of histologically confirmed RPOC in post-CS patients (only 42%). In women after spontaneous delivery of the placenta, the diagnosis of RPOC was confirmed by histological correlate in 63%, and the highest concordance occurred in women after manual removal of the placenta in 75%.
Conclusions: Concordance with histological findings of chorion or amnion was seen in 62% of cases; this means that the
incidence rate in our study was around 0.53%. The lowest concordance is after CS deliveries, 42%. D&C for RPOC should be performed after adequate clinical evaluation and in the knowledge of 38% false positivity. There is certainly more space for a conservative approach under appropriate clinical conditions, especially in patients after CS.

Abstract

Objectives: Postpartum retained products of conception are a relatively rare diagnosis occurring in approximately 1% of cases after spontaneous deliveries and abortions. The most common clinical signs are bleeding and abdominal pain. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs and ultrasound examination.
Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 200 surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum obtained in 64 months. We correlated the method and accuracy of diagnosis with definitive histological findings.
Results: During 64 months, we performed 23 412 deliveries. The frequency of procedures for diagnosis of retained products of conception (RPOC) was 0.85%. Most (73.5%) of the D&C were performed within six weeks of delivery. Histologically, the correct diagnosis was confirmed in 62% (chorion + amniotic envelope). There was interestingly lower concordance of histologically confirmed RPOC in post-CS patients (only 42%). In women after spontaneous delivery of the placenta, the diagnosis of RPOC was confirmed by histological correlate in 63%, and the highest concordance occurred in women after manual removal of the placenta in 75%.
Conclusions: Concordance with histological findings of chorion or amnion was seen in 62% of cases; this means that the
incidence rate in our study was around 0.53%. The lowest concordance is after CS deliveries, 42%. D&C for RPOC should be performed after adequate clinical evaluation and in the knowledge of 38% false positivity. There is certainly more space for a conservative approach under appropriate clinical conditions, especially in patients after CS.

Get Citation

Keywords

retained products of conception; D& C; hysteroscopic resection; manually removed placenta

About this article
Title

Retained products of conception — a retrospective analysis of 200 cases of surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 94, No 12 (2023)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

967-971

Published online

2023-07-11

Page views

550

Article views/downloads

622

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2023.0068

Pubmed

37435917

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2023;94(12):967-971.

Keywords

retained products of conception
D&C
hysteroscopic resection
manually removed placenta

Authors

Petr Velebil
Lucie Hajkova Hympanova
Hynek Herman
Michal Emingr
Petr Krepelka
Jiri Hanacek

References (12)
  1. Wolman I, Altman E, Faith G, et al. Combined clinical and ultrasonographic work-up for the diagnosis of retained products of conception. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92(3): 1162–1164.
  2. Abbasi S, Jamal A, Eslamian L, et al. Role of clinical and ultrasound findings in the diagnosis of retained products of conception. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32(5): 704–707.
  3. Carlan SJ, Scott WT, Pollack R, et al. Appearance of the uterus by ultrasound immediately after placental delivery with pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound. 1997; 25(6): 301–308, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199707)25:6<301::aid-jcu3>3.0.co;2-g.
  4. de Vries JI, van der Linden RM, van der Linden HC. Predictive value of sonographic examination to visualize retained placenta directly after birth at 16 to 28 weeks. J Ultrasound Med. 2000; 19(1): 7–12; quiz 13.
  5. Sadan O, Golan A, Girtler O, et al. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of retained products of conception. J Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23(3): 371–374.
  6. Pather S, Ford M, Reid R, et al. Postpartum curettage: an audit of 200 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 45(5): 368–371.
  7. Wolman I, Gordon D, Yaron Y, et al. Transvaginal sonohysterography for the evaluation and treatment of retained products of conception. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000; 50(2): 73–76.
  8. Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Bergman M, et al. Recurrence of retained placenta in multiple consecutive deliveries. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(21): 3574–3579.
  9. Granfors M, Sandström A, Stephansson O, et al. Placental location and risk of retained placenta in women with a previous cesarean section: A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99(12): 1666–1673.
  10. Perlman N, Carusi D. <p>Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management</p>. International Journal of Women's Health. 2019; Volume 11: 527–534.
  11. Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, et al. FIGO Placenta Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 140(3): 265–273.
  12. Barel O, Krakov A, Pansky M, et al. Intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic treatment for retained products of conception: what are the risk factors? Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(3): 775–779.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl