open access
Apical defect — the essence of cystocele pathogenesis?
, 1, 1, 2, 3
Affiliations- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland, Poland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Biochemistry, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Cracow University, Cracow, Poland
open access
Abstract
Objectives: Lack of standardization causes misunderstandings in planning of cystocele treatment and the evaluation of surgical method effectiveness. The POP-Q System and DeLancey’s three levels of pelvic support do not account for the phenomenon of cystocele caused by an apical defect. We aimed to evaluate the impact of level I defect on the formation of cystocele.
Material and methods: Women reporting complaints related to bladder prolapse (cystocele) were subjected to a urogynecological examination. For this purpose, a simple and standardized method was used, based on the POP-Q System and DeLancey’s three levels of pelvic support. Furthermore, it was expanded by evaluating the impact of level I defect (apical defect) on prolapse at level II of the anterior compartment.
Results: In total, contribution of an apical defect to the pathogenesis of cystocele was founded in 72.2% of 302 female patients included in this study. In 30.8% the cystocele was caused exclusively by an apical defect. In turn, in 41.4% of patients, it resulted from concomitant apical and level II defect of the anterior compartment (lateral or central).
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an apical defect may play a significant role in the development of a cystocele. Hence, it could be essential to take the influence of an apical defect on level II in anterior compartment into account when planning a surgical procedure. The authors suggest that lack of such procedures potentially exposes some cystocele patients to ineffective treatment.
Abstract
Objectives: Lack of standardization causes misunderstandings in planning of cystocele treatment and the evaluation of surgical method effectiveness. The POP-Q System and DeLancey’s three levels of pelvic support do not account for the phenomenon of cystocele caused by an apical defect. We aimed to evaluate the impact of level I defect on the formation of cystocele.
Material and methods: Women reporting complaints related to bladder prolapse (cystocele) were subjected to a urogynecological examination. For this purpose, a simple and standardized method was used, based on the POP-Q System and DeLancey’s three levels of pelvic support. Furthermore, it was expanded by evaluating the impact of level I defect (apical defect) on prolapse at level II of the anterior compartment.
Results: In total, contribution of an apical defect to the pathogenesis of cystocele was founded in 72.2% of 302 female patients included in this study. In 30.8% the cystocele was caused exclusively by an apical defect. In turn, in 41.4% of patients, it resulted from concomitant apical and level II defect of the anterior compartment (lateral or central).
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an apical defect may play a significant role in the development of a cystocele. Hence, it could be essential to take the influence of an apical defect on level II in anterior compartment into account when planning a surgical procedure. The authors suggest that lack of such procedures potentially exposes some cystocele patients to ineffective treatment.
Keywords
apical defect; central defect; lateral defect; cystocele; pelvic organ prolapse
About this articleTitle
Apical defect — the essence of cystocele pathogenesis?
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Published online
2023-03-15
Page views
504
Article views/downloads
417
DOI
Pubmed
Keywords
apical defect
central defect
lateral defect
cystocele
pelvic organ prolapse
Authors
Pawel Szymanowski
Wioletta K. Szepieniec
Hanna Szweda
Janusz Ligeza
Anna Sedakierska-Chudy
References (15)- Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(6): 1160–1166.
- Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, et al. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183(6): 1365–1373; discussion 1373–1374.
- Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175(1): 10–17.
- Houman J, Weinberger JM, Eilber KS. Native tissue repairs for pelvic organ prolapse. Curr Urol Rep. 2017; 18(1): 6.
- Vellucci F, Regini C, Barbanti C, et al. Pelvic floor evaluation with transperineal ultrasound: a new approach. Minerva Ginecol. 2018; 70(1): 58–68.
- Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, et al. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(6): 1837–1840.
- Kantartzis KL, Turner LC, Shepherd JP, et al. Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26(2): 207–212.
- Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, et al. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(5): 1438–1443.
- Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, et al. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(3): 230.e1–230.e5.
- Walters MD, Ridgeway BM. Surgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121(2 Pt 1): 354–374.
- Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11(11): CD004014.
- Allen-Brady K, Norton PA, Hill AJ, et al. Risk of pelvic organ prolapse treatment based on extended family history. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223(1): 105.e1–105.e8.
- Altman D, Forsman M, Falconer C, et al. Genetic influence on stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol. 2008; 54(4): 918–922.
- Vasin RV, Filimonov VB, Mnikhovich MV, et al. [Morphologic structure and immunohistochemical analysis of vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse]. Urologiia. 2019(6): 12–20.
- Tunn R, Albrich S, Beilecke K, et al. Interdisciplinary S2k Guideline: Sonography in Urogynecology: Short Version - AWMF Registry Number: 015/055. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014; 74(12): 1093–1098.
