open access

Vol 94, No 5 (2023)
Research paper
Published online: 2023-04-05
Get Citation

Comparison of the clinical characteristics, glycemic control, and pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus in waves I and III of the COVID-19 pandemic: a reference center report

Magdalena Wilk1, Magdalena Kwiatkowska1, Michal Kania1, Radoslaw Dziedzic2, Adam Stepien2, Katarzyna Cyganek1, Hubert Huras3, Maciej T. Malecki1
·
Pubmed: 37042324
·
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(5):389-394.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
  2. Students' Scientific Group, Department of Metabolic Diseases and Diabetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
  3. Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland, Poland

open access

Vol 94, No 5 (2023)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Obstetrics
Published online: 2023-04-05

Abstract

Objectives: The medical care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the COVID-19 pandemic was influenced by changing epidemiological conditions and government regulations. Aim — To compare the clinical pregnancy data of GDM women between waves I and III of the pandemic. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from the GDM clinic and compared the periods of March–May 2020 (wave I) and March–May 2021 (wave III). Results: Women with GDM during wave I (n = 119) compared to wave III (n = 116) were older (33.0 ± 4.7 vs 32.1 ± 4.8 years; p = 0.07), booked later (21.8 ± 8.4 vs 20.3 ± 8.5 weeks; p = 0.17), and had their last appointment earlier (35.5 ± 2.0 vs 35.7 ± 3.2 weeks; p < 0.01). Telemedicine consultations were used more frequently during wave I (46.8% vs 24.1%; p < 0.01), while insulin therapy was used less often (64.7% vs 80.2%; p < 0.01). Mean fasting self-measured glucose did not differ (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 4.8 ± 0.3 mmol/L; p = 0.49), but higher postprandial glucose was reported during wave I (6.6 ± 0.9 vs 6.3 ± 0.6 mmol/l; p < 0.01). Pregnancy outcome data were available for 77 wave I pregnancies and 75 wave III pregnancies. The groups were similar in terms of gestational week of delivery (38.3 ± 1.4 vs 38.1 ± 1.6 weeks), cesarean sections (58.4% vs 61.3%), APGAR scores (9.7 ± 1.0 vs 9.7 ± 1.0 pts), and birth weights (3306.6 ± 457.6 g vs 3243.9 ± 496.8 g) (p = NS for all). The mean wave I neonate length was slightly higher (54.3 ± 2.6 cm vs 53.3 ± 2.6 cm; p = 0.04). Conclusions: We identified differences between wave I and wave III pregnancies for several clinical characteristics. However, nearly all pregnancy outcomes were found to be similar.

Abstract

Objectives: The medical care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the COVID-19 pandemic was influenced by changing epidemiological conditions and government regulations. Aim — To compare the clinical pregnancy data of GDM women between waves I and III of the pandemic. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records from the GDM clinic and compared the periods of March–May 2020 (wave I) and March–May 2021 (wave III). Results: Women with GDM during wave I (n = 119) compared to wave III (n = 116) were older (33.0 ± 4.7 vs 32.1 ± 4.8 years; p = 0.07), booked later (21.8 ± 8.4 vs 20.3 ± 8.5 weeks; p = 0.17), and had their last appointment earlier (35.5 ± 2.0 vs 35.7 ± 3.2 weeks; p < 0.01). Telemedicine consultations were used more frequently during wave I (46.8% vs 24.1%; p < 0.01), while insulin therapy was used less often (64.7% vs 80.2%; p < 0.01). Mean fasting self-measured glucose did not differ (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 4.8 ± 0.3 mmol/L; p = 0.49), but higher postprandial glucose was reported during wave I (6.6 ± 0.9 vs 6.3 ± 0.6 mmol/l; p < 0.01). Pregnancy outcome data were available for 77 wave I pregnancies and 75 wave III pregnancies. The groups were similar in terms of gestational week of delivery (38.3 ± 1.4 vs 38.1 ± 1.6 weeks), cesarean sections (58.4% vs 61.3%), APGAR scores (9.7 ± 1.0 vs 9.7 ± 1.0 pts), and birth weights (3306.6 ± 457.6 g vs 3243.9 ± 496.8 g) (p = NS for all). The mean wave I neonate length was slightly higher (54.3 ± 2.6 cm vs 53.3 ± 2.6 cm; p = 0.04). Conclusions: We identified differences between wave I and wave III pregnancies for several clinical characteristics. However, nearly all pregnancy outcomes were found to be similar.

Get Citation

Keywords

diabetes; gestational diabetes mellitus; GDM; coronavirus; pregnancy

About this article
Title

Comparison of the clinical characteristics, glycemic control, and pregnancy outcomes between women with gestational diabetes mellitus in waves I and III of the COVID-19 pandemic: a reference center report

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 94, No 5 (2023)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

389-394

Published online

2023-04-05

Page views

2023

Article views/downloads

357

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2023.0014

Pubmed

37042324

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2023;94(5):389-394.

Keywords

diabetes
gestational diabetes mellitus
GDM
coronavirus
pregnancy

Authors

Magdalena Wilk
Magdalena Kwiatkowska
Michal Kania
Radoslaw Dziedzic
Adam Stepien
Katarzyna Cyganek
Hubert Huras
Maciej T. Malecki

References (21)
  1. Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, et al. Covid-19 - Implications for the Health Care System. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(15): 1483–1488.
  2. Murphy HR. Managing Diabetes in Pregnancy Before, During, and After COVID-19. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020; 22(6): 454–461.
  3. Sweeting A, Wong J, Murphy HR, et al. A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2022; 43(5): 763–793.
  4. Chehab RF, Ferrara A, Greenberg MB, et al. Glycemic Control Trajectories and Risk of Perinatal Complications Among Individuals With Gestational Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(9): e2233955.
  5. Torlone E, Sculli MA, Bonomo M, et al. Recommendations and management of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 166: 108345.
  6. Justman N, Shahak G, Gutzeit O, et al. Lockdown with a Price: The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center. Isr Med Assoc J. 2020; 22(9): 533–537.
  7. Kleinwechter HJ, Weber KS, Mingers N, et al. COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS) Network. Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: results from the COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(4): 631.e1–631.e19.
  8. Bociąga-Jasik M, Wojciechowska W, Terlecki M, et al. Comparison between COVID‑19 outcomes in the first 3 waves of the pandemic: a reference hospital report. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022; 132(10).
  9. Wilk M, Surowiec P, Matejko B, et al. Diabetes Management Delivery and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus during the First Wave of the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Reference Center Report. J Diabetes Res. 2021; 2021: 5515902.
  10. Guidelines on the management of patients with Diabetes. A position of Diabetes Poland. Curr Top Diabetes. 2022; 2(1): 1–134.
  11. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Travis E, et al. Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nature Methods. 2020; 17(3): 261–272.
  12. Sagan A, Bryndova L, Kowalska-Bobko I, et al. A reversal of fortune: Comparison of health system responses to COVID-19 in the Visegrad group during the early phases of the pandemic. Health Policy. 2022; 126(5): 446–455.
  13. Pinkas J, Jankowski M, Szumowski Ł, et al. Public Health Interventions to Mitigate Early Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Poland. Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26: e924730.
  14. Eleftheriades M, Chatzakis C, Papachatzopoulou E, et al. Prediction of insulin treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutr Diabetes. 2021; 11(1): 30.
  15. Wong VW, Jalaludin B. Gestational diabetes mellitus: who requires insulin therapy? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 51(5): 432–436.
  16. Bertini A, Gárate B, Pardo F, et al. Impact of Remote Monitoring Technologies for Assisting Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10.
  17. Eberle C, Stichling S. Telemedical Approaches to Managing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus During COVID-19: Systematic Review. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021; 4(3): e28630.
  18. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(Suppl 1): S232–S243.
  19. Byström M, Liu A, Quinton AE, et al. Gestational Diabetes Independently Increases Birth Length and Augments the Effects of Maternal BMI on Birth Weight: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Pediatr. 2014; 2: 112.
  20. Nachtergaele C, Vicaut E, Pinto S, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: Can fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c replace the oral glucose tolerance test to screen for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 172: 108640.
  21. Meek CL, Lindsay RS, Scott EM, et al. Approaches to screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnant women during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabet Med. 2021; 38(1): e14380.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl