Vol 93, No 11 (2022)
Editorial
Published online: 2022-11-23
Minimally invasive surgery in gynecology. Reconciling the past with a view to the future
Abstract
Not available
References
- Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(2): 167–175.
- Stojko R, Malinowski A, Baranowski W, et al. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians for removal of the uterus by vaginal, laparoscopic and abdominal routes. Ginekologia Polska. 2020; 91(6): 352–361.
- Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017; 129(6): e155–e159.
- Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(8): CD003677.
- Pogoda KA, Malinowski A, Majchrzak-Baczmanska D, et al. The analysis of vaginal hysterectomy results depending on the uterine size. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(5): 339–343.
- Balikoglu M, Bayraktar B, Filiz D, et al. The effect of experience on the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery: 1295 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(9): 681–685.
- Monist MJ, Skorupski P, Warda P, et al. Ureteric injury after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a report of 3 cases and brief literature review. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(7): 585–590.
- Misal M, Delara R, Wasson MN. Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 32(4): 243–247.
- https://grupamedica.pl/wydarzenia/i-miedzynarodowy-kongres-ginekologii-operacyjnej/ (19.11.2022).
![](https://journals.viamedica.pl/plugins/generic/popups/images/icons/close.png)