open access

Vol 94, No 9 (2023)
Research paper
Published online: 2022-10-12
Get Citation

Modified segmental bowel resection technique in deep infiltrated endometriosis. Is it a suitable method to reduce the risk of bowel leakage after an extensive complex surgery?

Ewa Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk1, Krzysztof Nowak1, Weronika Ogonowska2, Maja Mrugala1, Tomasz Sachanbinski3
·
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(9):698-703.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Oncological Gynecology, Centre of Oncology in Opole, Poland
  2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Opole, Poland
  3. Department of Oncological Surgery, Centre of Oncology in Opole, Poland

open access

Vol 94, No 9 (2023)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2022-10-12

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the novel modified laparoscopic technique of the bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis
(DIE) of the bowel versus the classical technique of bowel segmental resection in terms of anastomosis leakage.
Material and methods: Patients (n = 138) treated with segmental bowel resections due to DIE were included; 30 patients
had the classic, while 108 patients had the modified laparoscopic bowel segmental resection with indocyanine green
(ICG) vascular visualization and fibrin sealant use.
Results: The modified technique was used more often in complex operations (65.7% vs 46.6%). More anastomotic
leakages occurred in patients undergoing the classic technique than the modified technique (10% vs 2.8%; p = 0.117).
No leakage in modified versus 12% in classic technique was observed in simple segmental bowel resections (p = 0.05);
2.5% of cases with leakage in modified versus 7.1% in classic technique were observed in bowel resections with hysterectomy.
In complex cases operated with the modified technique, the frequency of anastomotic leakage was 4.2%, which
were even less than leakage in simple cases in classic technique group (10%). Although the low location of the lesions
increases the risk of leakage, the modified technique was associated with a small percentage of leakages (25% vs 6.3%).
The laparotomy conversion rate was similar in both groups (3.4% for classic and 2.7% for modified).
Conclusions: In DIE, the modified technique of segmental bowel resection showed superiority over the classic technique in
terms of the risk of anastomotic leakage. This risk was lower regardless of the complexity of the surgery and lesion location.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the novel modified laparoscopic technique of the bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis
(DIE) of the bowel versus the classical technique of bowel segmental resection in terms of anastomosis leakage.
Material and methods: Patients (n = 138) treated with segmental bowel resections due to DIE were included; 30 patients
had the classic, while 108 patients had the modified laparoscopic bowel segmental resection with indocyanine green
(ICG) vascular visualization and fibrin sealant use.
Results: The modified technique was used more often in complex operations (65.7% vs 46.6%). More anastomotic
leakages occurred in patients undergoing the classic technique than the modified technique (10% vs 2.8%; p = 0.117).
No leakage in modified versus 12% in classic technique was observed in simple segmental bowel resections (p = 0.05);
2.5% of cases with leakage in modified versus 7.1% in classic technique were observed in bowel resections with hysterectomy.
In complex cases operated with the modified technique, the frequency of anastomotic leakage was 4.2%, which
were even less than leakage in simple cases in classic technique group (10%). Although the low location of the lesions
increases the risk of leakage, the modified technique was associated with a small percentage of leakages (25% vs 6.3%).
The laparotomy conversion rate was similar in both groups (3.4% for classic and 2.7% for modified).
Conclusions: In DIE, the modified technique of segmental bowel resection showed superiority over the classic technique in
terms of the risk of anastomotic leakage. This risk was lower regardless of the complexity of the surgery and lesion location.

Get Citation

Keywords

deep infiltrating endometriosis; laparoscopy; modified technique; anastomotic leakage

About this article
Title

Modified segmental bowel resection technique in deep infiltrated endometriosis. Is it a suitable method to reduce the risk of bowel leakage after an extensive complex surgery?

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 94, No 9 (2023)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

698-703

Published online

2022-10-12

Page views

330

Article views/downloads

326

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2022.0122

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2023;94(9):698-703.

Keywords

deep infiltrating endometriosis
laparoscopy
modified technique
anastomotic leakage

Authors

Ewa Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk
Krzysztof Nowak
Weronika Ogonowska
Maja Mrugala
Tomasz Sachanbinski

References (24)
  1. Giudice L, Kao L. Endometriosis. The Lancet. 2004; 364(9447): 1789–1799.
  2. Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, et al. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(5): 1292–1299.
  3. Yong PJ, Bedaiwy MA, Alotaibi F, et al. Pathogenesis of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 71: 2–13.
  4. Ferrero S, Stabilini C, Barra F, et al. Bowel resection for intestinal endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 71: 114–128.
  5. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, et al. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(5): 462–479.
  6. Redwine DB, Koning M, Sharpe DR, et al. Laparoscopic segmental resection of the sigmoid colon for endometriosis. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1991; 1(4): 217–220.
  7. Keckstein J, Wiesinger H. Deep endometriosis, including intestinal involvement--the interdisciplinary approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005; 14(3): 160–166.
  8. Vigueras SA, Sumak R, Cabrera R, et al. Bowel anastomosis leakage following endometriosis surgery: an evidence based analysis of risk factors and prevention techniques. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020; 12(3): 207–225.
  9. Vasiliu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R, et al. Review of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015; 110(4): 319–326.
  10. Iversen H, Ahlberg M, Lindqvist M, et al. Changes in Clinical Practice Reduce the Rate of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resections. World J Surg. 2018; 42(7): 2234–2241.
  11. Chan DK, Lee SK, Ang JJ. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography decreases the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2020; 168(6): 1128–1137.
  12. Raimondo D, Mastronardi M, Mabrouk M, et al. Rectosigmoid Endometriosis Vascular Patterns at Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography and their Correlation with Clinicopathological Data. Surg Innov. 2020; 27(5): 474–480.
  13. Raimondo D, Maletta M, Borghese G, et al. Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography after Full-thickness Bowel Resection for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis-A Feasibility Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(6): 1225–1230.
  14. Afors K, Centini G, Fernandes R, et al. Segmental and Discoid Resection are Preferential to Bowel Shaving for Medium-Term Symptomatic Relief in Patients With Bowel Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23(7): 1123–1129.
  15. Minelli L, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal resection for bowel endometriosis: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Arch Surg. 2009; 144(3): 234–9; discussion 239.
  16. Räsänen M, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Carpelan-Holmström M, et al. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30(10): 1323–1328.
  17. Wu SW, Ma CC, Yang Yu. Role of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(47): 18031–18037.
  18. Ledu N, Rubod C, Piessen G, et al. Management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum: Is a systematic temporary stoma relevant? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018; 47(1): 1–7.
  19. Oliveira MA, Pereira TR, Gilbert A, et al. Bowel complications in endometriosis surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 35: 51–62.
  20. Madiedo A, Hall J. Minimally Invasive Management of Diverticular Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021; 34(2): 113–120.
  21. Kryzauskas M, Poskus E, Dulskas A, et al. The problem of colorectal anastomosis safety. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(2): e18560.
  22. Akladios C, Messori P, Faller E, et al. Is ileostomy always necessary following rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(1): 103–109.
  23. Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F, et al. Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18(11): 1620–1624.
  24. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: the impact of fibrin glue. Am J Surg. 2010; 199(4): 435–441.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl