open access
Should we always consider the 10th percentile as a sonographic “fingerprint” of a small fetus?
- Department of Perinatology and Gynaecology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- Clinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chair of Women’s Health, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
open access
Abstract
Abstract
Title
Should we always consider the 10th percentile as a sonographic “fingerprint” of a small fetus?
Journal
Issue
Article type
Other materials agreed with the Editors
Pages
765-766
Published online
2022-10-05
Page views
3833
Article views/downloads
364
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2022;93(10):765-766.
Authors
Anna Dera-Szymanowska
Martyna Polska
Mariola Ropacka-Lesiak
Krzysztof Szymanowski
Wojciech Cnota
- Cuttini M, Cortinovis I, Bossi A, et al. Proportionality of small for gestational age babies as a predictor of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 1992; 5(1): 56–63.
- Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, et al. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality. BJOG. 2007; 114(4): 474–477.
- Aye AA, Agida TE, Babalola AA, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term: A comparison of shepard and hadlock methods. Ann Afr Med. 2022; 21(1): 49–53.
- Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, et al. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(6): 761–768.
- Ciobanu A, Formuso C, Syngelaki A, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(4): 488–495.
- Ciobanu A, Rouvali A, Syngelaki A, et al. Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry, and biomarkers at 35–37 weeks’ gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; 220(5): 486.e1–486.e11.
- Nicolaides KH. Turning the pyramid of prenatal care. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 29(3): 183–196.
- Dera-Szymanowska A, Horst N, Sobkowski M, et al. Outcome dependent growth curves for singleton pregnancies based on birth weight of babies for Polish population. Ginekol Pol. 2020; 91(12): 740–747.
- Horst N, Dera-Szymanowska A, Breborowicz G, et al. Outcome dependent twin growth curves based on birth weight percentiles for Polish population. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2020; 35(13): 2530–2535.
- Szymanowska AD, Horst N, Markwitz W, et al. Outcome-dependent twin growth curves for the bigger and smaller neonate within a Polish population – The best clinical support. Archives of Medical Science. 2022.