open access
Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication in a Chinese family
Affiliations- Department of Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China
- Department of of child Health Care, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China
- Department of Stomatology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, PR China
open access
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the relationship between Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication and mental retardation identifiable by chromosomal G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Material and methods: Chromosomal G-banding, CMA, and physical and mental examinations were performed on four members of a Chinese family. Results: The mother and one baby had the same microduplication (arr[GRCh37] Xp22.32p22.31(5970505-6075215)x2), and the baby had mental retardation. Conclusions: Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication in males could cause mental retardation. Combination of NIPT, prenatal ultrasound, chromosomal G-banding and CMA has high accuracy in risk assessment for prenatal diagnosis.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the relationship between Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication and mental retardation identifiable by chromosomal G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Material and methods: Chromosomal G-banding, CMA, and physical and mental examinations were performed on four members of a Chinese family. Results: The mother and one baby had the same microduplication (arr[GRCh37] Xp22.32p22.31(5970505-6075215)x2), and the baby had mental retardation. Conclusions: Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication in males could cause mental retardation. Combination of NIPT, prenatal ultrasound, chromosomal G-banding and CMA has high accuracy in risk assessment for prenatal diagnosis.
Keywords
prenatal diagnosis; Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication; chromosomal microarray analysis; mental retardation
About this articleTitle
Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication in a Chinese family
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
188-190
Published online
2022-03-18
Page views
2489
Article views/downloads
506
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2023;94(3):188-190.
Keywords
prenatal diagnosis
Xp22.32p22.31 microduplication
chromosomal microarray analysis
mental retardation
Authors
Weixin Cui
Xi Li
Yan Jin
Juan Zhang
References (13)- Kopp N, Amarillo I, Martinez-Agosto J, et al. Pathogenic paternally inherited NLGN4X deletion in a female with autism spectrum disorder: Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular characterization. Am J Med Genet A. 2021; 185(3): 894–900.
- Li F, Shen Y, Köhler U, et al. Interstitial microduplication of Xp22.31: Causative of intellectual disability or benign copy number variant? Eur J Med Genet. 2010; 53(2): 93–99.
- Du Y, Lin J, Lan L, et al. Detection of chromosome abnormalities using current noninvasive prenatal testing: A multi-center comparative study. Biosci Trends. 2018; 12(3): 317–324.
- McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M. An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. Karger, Basel 2016.
- Oğlak SC, Bademkıran MH, Obut M. Predictor variables in the success of slow-release dinoprostone used for cervical ripening in intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020; 49(6): 101739.
- Baldwin EL, Lee JY, Blake DM, et al. Enhanced detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances using a targeted plus whole genome oligonucleotide microarray. Genet Med. 2008; 10(6): 415–429.
- Liu P, Erez A, Nagamani SC, et al. Copy number gain at Xp22.31 includes complex duplication rearrangements and recurrent triplications. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20(10): 1975–1988.
- Faletra F, D'Adamo AP, Santa Rocca M, et al. Does the 1.5 Mb microduplication in chromosome band Xp22.31 have a pathogenetic role? New contribution and a review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2012; 158A(2): 461–464.
- Olson H, Shen Y, Avallone J, et al. Copy number variation plays an important role in clinical epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2014; 75(6): 943–958.
- Addis L, Sproviero W, Thomas SV, et al. Identification of new risk factors for rolandic epilepsy: CNV at Xp22.31 and alterations at cholinergic synapses. J Med Genet. 2018; 55(9): 607–616.
- Alvarado DM, Aferol H, McCall K, et al. Familial isolated clubfoot is associated with recurrent chromosome 17q23.1q23.2 microduplications containing TBX4. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 87(1): 154–160.
- Carrel L, Willard HF. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature. 2005; 434(7031): 400–404.
- Chen CP, Hung FY, Chern SR, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 7 in a single colony at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 58(6): 852–854.
