open access

Vol 91, No 11 (2020)
Review paper
Published online: 2020-11-13
Get Citation

Pelvic venous insufficiency — an often-forgotten cause of chronic pelvic pain

Jacek Szymanski1, Grzegorz Jakiel1, Aneta Slabuszewska-Jozwiak1
·
Pubmed: 33301167
·
Ginekol Pol 2020;91(11):704-708.
Affiliations
  1. 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland

open access

Vol 91, No 11 (2020)
REVIEW PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2020-11-13

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common health problem that afflicts 39% of women at some time in their life. It is a common challenge
for gynecologists, internists, surgeons, gastroenterologists, and pain management physicians. Pelvic venous insufficiency
(PVI) accounts for 16–31% of cases of chronic pain but it seems to be often overlooked in differential diagnosis. The aim of
this article was to summarize current data concerning PVI. The embolization of insufficient ovarian veins remains the gold
standard of therapy but the optimal procedure is yet to be determined. Well-designed randomized trials are required to
establish the best treatment modalities.

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common health problem that afflicts 39% of women at some time in their life. It is a common challenge
for gynecologists, internists, surgeons, gastroenterologists, and pain management physicians. Pelvic venous insufficiency
(PVI) accounts for 16–31% of cases of chronic pain but it seems to be often overlooked in differential diagnosis. The aim of
this article was to summarize current data concerning PVI. The embolization of insufficient ovarian veins remains the gold
standard of therapy but the optimal procedure is yet to be determined. Well-designed randomized trials are required to
establish the best treatment modalities.

Get Citation

Keywords

chronic pelvic pain; pelvic venous insufficiency; pelvic congestion syndrome; embolization

About this article
Title

Pelvic venous insufficiency — an often-forgotten cause of chronic pelvic pain

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 91, No 11 (2020)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

704-708

Published online

2020-11-13

Page views

1158

Article views/downloads

1412

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2020.0093

Pubmed

33301167

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2020;91(11):704-708.

Keywords

chronic pelvic pain
pelvic venous insufficiency
pelvic congestion syndrome
embolization

Authors

Jacek Szymanski
Grzegorz Jakiel
Aneta Slabuszewska-Jozwiak

References (37)
  1. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106(11): 1149–1155.
  2. Riding DM, Hansrani V, McCollum C. Pelvic vein incompetence: clinical perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017; 13: 439–447.
  3. Black CM, Thorpe K, Venrbux A, et al. Research reporting standards for endovascular treatment of pelvic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21(6): 796–803.
  4. Stones RW. Pelvic vascular congestion-half a century later. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 46(4): 831–836.
  5. Ignacio EA, Dua R, Sarin S, et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008; 25(4): 361–368.
  6. Corrêa M, Bianchini L, Saleh J, et al. Síndrome da congestão pélvica e embolização de varizes pélvicas. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro. 2019; 18.
  7. Ruel J. May-Thurner Syndrome: An often-missed cause of chronic pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019; 31(7): 388–390.
  8. Monedero J, Ezpeleta S, Castro J, et al. Embolization treatment of recurrent varices of pelvic origin. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2016; 21(1): 3–11.
  9. Lopez AJ. Female pelvic vein embolization: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015; 38(4): 806–820.
  10. Marsh P, Holdstock J, Harrison C, et al. Pelvic vein reflux in female patients with varicose veins: comparison of incidence between a specialist private vein clinic and the vascular department of a National Health Service District General Hospital. Phlebology. 2009; 24(3): 108–113.
  11. Czuczwar P, Stępniak A, Szkodziak P, et al. Pelvic congestion syndrome initially misdiagnosed as a hydrosalpinx - a diagnostic challenge. Ginekol Pol. 2017; 88(3): 166.
  12. Beard RW, Highman JH, Pearce S, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic varicosities in women with chronic pelvic pain. Lancet. 1984; 2(8409): 946–949.
  13. Nascimento AB, Mitchell DG, Holland G. Ovarian veins: magnetic resonance imaging findings in an asymptomatic population. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002; 15(5): 551–556.
  14. Dos Santos SJ, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC, et al. Ovarian Vein Diameter Cannot Be Used as an Indicator of Ovarian Venous Reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; 49(1): 90–94.
  15. Park SJ, Lim JW, Ko YT, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182(3): 683–688.
  16. Malgor RD, Adrahtas D, Spentzouris G, et al. The role of duplex ultrasound in the pelvic congestion syndrome workup. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013; 1(1): 107–38.
  17. Hansrani V, Dhorat Z, McCollum CN. Diagnosing of pelvic vein incompetence using minimally invasive ultrasound techniques. Vascular. 2017; 25(3): 253–259.
  18. Bookwalter CA, VanBuren WM, Neisen MJ, et al. Imaging appearance and nonsurgical management of pelvic venous congestion syndrome. Radiographics. 2019; 39(2): 596–608.
  19. Chennur VS, Nzekwu EV, Bhayana D, et al. MR venography using time-resolved imaging in interventional management of pelvic venous insufficiency. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019; 44(6): 2301–2307.
  20. Riding DM, Pond EJ, McCollum C, et al. Seeking consensus amongst UK-based interventional radiologists on the imaging diagnosis of pelvic vein incompetence in women with chronic pelvic pain: A modified Delphi study. Phlebology. 2019; 34(7): 486–495.
  21. Smorgick N, Marsh CA, As-Sanie S, et al. Prevalence of pain syndromes, mood conditions, and asthma in adolescents and young women with endometriosis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26(3): 171–175.
  22. Di Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 181: 289–293.
  23. Weiss G, Maseelall P, Schott LL, et al. Adenomyosis a variant, not a disease? Evidence from hysterectomized menopausal women in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Fertil Steril. 2009; 91(1): 201–206.
  24. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(6): 1550–1555.
  25. Zimmermann A, Bernuit D, Gerlinger C, et al. Prevalence, symptoms and management of uterine fibroids: an international internet-based survey of 21,746 women. BMC Womens Health. 2012; 12: 6.
  26. Magtibay PM, Nyholm JL, Hernandez JL, et al. Ovarian remnant syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(6): 2062–2066.
  27. Soysal ME, Soysal S, Vicdan K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(5): 931–939.
  28. Farquhar CM, Rogers V, Franks S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate and psychotherapy for the treatment of pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96(10): 1153–1162.
  29. Shokeir T, Amr M, Abdelshaheed M. The efficacy of Implanon for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion: 1-year randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 280(3): 437–443.
  30. Edwards RD, Robertson IR, MacLean AB, et al. Case report: pelvic pain syndrome--successful treatment of a case by ovarian vein embolization. Clin Radiol. 1993; 47(6): 429–431.
  31. Marcelin C, Izaaryene J, Castelli M, et al. Embolization of ovarian vein for pelvic congestion syndrome with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017; 98(12): 843–848.
  32. Hartung O. Embolization is essential in the treatment of leg varicosities due to pelvic venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2015; 30(1 Suppl): 81–85.
  33. Rabe E, Pannier F. Embolization is not essential in the treatment of leg varices due to pelvic venous insufficiency. Phlebology. 2015; 30(1 Suppl): 86–88.
  34. Abdelsalam H. Clinical outcome of ovarian vein embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2019; 53(1): 15–20.
  35. Pyra K, Woźniak S, Roman T, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of endovascular embolisation for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome--preliminary study. Ginekol Pol. 2015; 86(5): 346–351.
  36. Guirola JA, Sánchez-Ballestin M, Sierre S, et al. A Randomized Trial of Endovascular Embolization Treatment in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Fibered Platinum Coils versus Vascular Plugs with 1-Year Clinical Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018; 29(1): 45–53.
  37. Campbell B, Goodyear S, Franklin I, et al. Investigation and treatment of pelvic vein reflux associated with varicose veins: Current views and practice of 100 UK vascular specialists. Phlebology. 2020; 35(1): 56–61.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl