open access

Vol 89, No 5 (2018)
Research paper
Published online: 2018-05-30
Get Citation

Bilateral synchronous breast cancer developed as metachronous malignancy after therapy of other primaries

Michał Kurzyński1, Jerzy Mituś23, Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa2, Beata Sas-Korczyńska4
·
Pubmed: 30084474
·
Ginekol Pol 2018;89(5):235-239.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Garncarska street 11, 31-115 Cracow, Poland
  2. Department of Surgical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Garncarska street 11, 31-115 Cracow, Poland
  3. Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  4. Department of Oncology Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Poland, Garncarska street 11, 31-115, Garncarska street 11, 31-115 Cracow, Poland

open access

Vol 89, No 5 (2018)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2018-05-30

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer morbidity rates have been increasing steadily. A longer lifespan and easier access to modern diagnostic and therapeutic methods are the main reasons for the growing number of cancer survivors. Additionally, some types of oncological treatment, such as radiotherapy or immunosuppression, may also increase the risk of secondary tumors. These factors have resulted in an increased incidence of primary multiple cancers. Multiple primary cancers are generally under­stood as either synchronous, in which the cancers occur at the same time, or metachronous, in which the cancers follow in sequence (for instance, more than 2 months apart).The results published in other studies show that between 2% and 15.8% of all cancer patients have more primary multiple cancers. Within this group with multiple primary cancers, some have bilateral breast cancer, and our study focuses on patients from this group.

Material and methods: Our study describes 10 patients who were treated for bilateral synchronous breast cancer at the Cracow Branch of the Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology during the years 1992–2014 and who developed another primary tumor after their treatment bilateral synchronous breast cancer.

Results: In our discussion we present detailed data on the incidence of metachronous cancers in the 10 patients, including breast cancer, following the treatment of their other primary tumors.

Conclusion: The 10 cases of our study, and clinical experiences and publications in general show how important it is for patients to continue medical follow-up after treatment of primary tumors, not only to detect recurrences as early as pos­sible, but also to diagnose any other malignancies occurring in other sites, including secondary, treatment-related tumors.

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer morbidity rates have been increasing steadily. A longer lifespan and easier access to modern diagnostic and therapeutic methods are the main reasons for the growing number of cancer survivors. Additionally, some types of oncological treatment, such as radiotherapy or immunosuppression, may also increase the risk of secondary tumors. These factors have resulted in an increased incidence of primary multiple cancers. Multiple primary cancers are generally under­stood as either synchronous, in which the cancers occur at the same time, or metachronous, in which the cancers follow in sequence (for instance, more than 2 months apart).The results published in other studies show that between 2% and 15.8% of all cancer patients have more primary multiple cancers. Within this group with multiple primary cancers, some have bilateral breast cancer, and our study focuses on patients from this group.

Material and methods: Our study describes 10 patients who were treated for bilateral synchronous breast cancer at the Cracow Branch of the Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology during the years 1992–2014 and who developed another primary tumor after their treatment bilateral synchronous breast cancer.

Results: In our discussion we present detailed data on the incidence of metachronous cancers in the 10 patients, including breast cancer, following the treatment of their other primary tumors.

Conclusion: The 10 cases of our study, and clinical experiences and publications in general show how important it is for patients to continue medical follow-up after treatment of primary tumors, not only to detect recurrences as early as pos­sible, but also to diagnose any other malignancies occurring in other sites, including secondary, treatment-related tumors.

Get Citation

Keywords

bilateral breast cancer, synchronous breast cancer, primary multiple cancer

About this article
Title

Bilateral synchronous breast cancer developed as metachronous malignancy after therapy of other primaries

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 89, No 5 (2018)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

235-239

Published online

2018-05-30

Page views

1820

Article views/downloads

1326

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2018.0041

Pubmed

30084474

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2018;89(5):235-239.

Keywords

bilateral breast cancer
synchronous breast cancer
primary multiple cancer

Authors

Michał Kurzyński
Jerzy Mituś
Marta Kołodziej-Rzepa
Beata Sas-Korczyńska

References (35)
  1. U.Wojciechowska, P.Olasek .K.Czauderna, J. Didkowska;”Nowotwory złośliwe w Polsce.
  2. Travis LB. The epidemiology of second primary cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(11): 2020–2026.
  3. IARC/ENCR/IACR Working Group: International rules for multiple primary cancers. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2005; 6: 104–106.
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer: International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers (ICD-O Third Edition). Internal Report No. 2004/02. Lyon: IARC, 2004.
  5. Błaszczyk J, Hudziec P. Nowotwory pierwotne mnogie (Multiple Primary Cancer) w populacji dolnośląskiej w latach 1984-2009.
  6. Coyte A, Morrison DS, McLoone P. Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 272.
  7. Rochefordiere Ad, Asselain B, Scholl S, et al. Simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas: A retrospective review of 149 cases. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 1994; 30(1): 35–41.
  8. Johnson CH, Peace S, Adamo P, et al. The 2007 Multiple Primary and Histology Coding Rules. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Bethesda, MD. ; 2007.
  9. Chen Y, Thompson W, Semenciw R, et al. Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8(10): 855–861.
  10. Amer MH. Multiple neoplasms, single primaries, and patient survival. Cancer Manag Res. 2014; 6: 119–134.
  11. Buiatti E, Crocetti E, Acciai S, et al. Incidence of second primary cancers in three Italian population-based cancer registries. Eur J Cancer. 1997; 33(11): 1829–1834.
  12. Weir HK, Johnson CJ, Thompson TD. The effect of multiple primary rules on population-based cancer survival. Cancer Causes Control. 2013; 24(6): 1231–1242.
  13. Rosso S, De Angelis R, Ciccolallo L, et al. EUROCARE Working Group. Multiple tumours in survival estimates. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(6): 1080–1094.
  14. AIRTUM Working Group, AIRTUM Working Group, CCM, AIEOP Working Group, AIRTUM Working Group. [Italian cancer figures, report 2010: Cancer prevalence in Italy. Patients living with cancer, long-term survivors and cured patients]. Epidemiol Prev. 2010; 34(5-6 Suppl 2): 1–188.
  15. Vogt A, Schmid S, Heinimann K, et al. Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review. ESMO Open. 2017; 2(2): e000172.
  16. Bhuller KS, Zhang Y, Li D, et al. Late mortality, secondary malignancy and hospitalisation in teenage and young adult survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: report of the Childhood/Adolescent/Young Adult Cancer Survivors Research Program and the BC Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer. Br J Haematol. 2016; 172(5): 757–768.
  17. Lisik-Habib M, Czernek U, Dębska-Szmich S, et al. Secondary cancer in a survivor of Hodgkin's lymphoma: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 2015; 9(2): 964–966.
  18. Wood ME, Vogel V, Ng A, et al. Second malignant neoplasms: assessment and strategies for risk reduction. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(30): 3734–3745.
  19. Franklin J, Pluetschow A, Paus M, et al. Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17(12): 1749–1760.
  20. Conway JL, Connors JM, Tyldesley S, et al. Secondary Breast Cancer Risk by Radiation Volume in Women With Hodgkin Lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 97(1): 35–41.
  21. Gabai-Kapara E, Lahad A, Kaufman B, et al. Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(39): 14205–14210.
  22. Vencken PM, Kriege M, Hooning M, et al. The risk of primary and contralateral breast cancer after ovarian cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: Implications for counseling. Cancer. 2013; 119(5): 955–962.
  23. 2017; 145(2): 346–351.
  24. Nathanson KL, Domchek SM. Therapeutic approaches for women predisposed to breast cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2011; 62: 295–306.
  25. Gangi A, Cass I, Paik D, et al. Breast cancer following ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149(12): 1306–1313.
  26. Warschkow R, Güller U, Cerny T, et al. Secondary malignancies after rectal cancer resection with and without radiation therapy: A propensity-adjusted, population-based SEER analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2017; 123(1): 139–146.
  27. Evans HS, Møller H, Robinson D, et al. The risk of subsequent primary cancers after colorectal cancer in southeast England. Gut. 2002; 50(5): 647–652.
  28. Zhu G, Chen Y, Zhu Z, et al. Risk of second primary cancer after treatment for esophageal cancer: a pooled analysis of nine cancer registries. Dis Esophagus. 2012; 25(6): 505–511.
  29. Jones AS, Morar P, Phillips DE, et al. Second primary tumors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1995; 75(6): 1343–1353, doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950315)75:6<1343::aid-cncr2820750617>3.0.co;2-t.
  30. Aydiner A, Karadeniz A, Uygun K, et al. Multiple primary neoplasms at a single institution: differences between synchronous and metachronous neoplasms. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000; 23(4): 364–370.
  31. Jégu J, Binder-Foucard F, Borel C, et al. Trends over three decades of the risk of second primary cancer among patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2013; 49(1): 9–14.
  32. Neumann F, Jégu J, Mougin C, et al. Risk of second primary cancer after a first potentially-human papillomavirus-related cancer: A population-based study. Prev Med. 2016; 90: 52–58.
  33. Rosso S, De Angelis R, Ciccolallo L, et al. EUROCARE Working Group. Multiple tumours in survival estimates. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(6): 1080–1094.
  34. Sánchez de Cos Escuín J, Rodríguez López DP, Utrabo Delgado I, et al. Disease Recurrence and Second Tumors in Long-term Survivors of Lung Cancer. Arch Bronconeumol. 2016; 52(4): 183–188.
  35. Bhaskarla A, Tang PC, Mashtare T, et al. Analysis of second primary lung cancers in the SEER database. J Surg Res. 2010; 162(1): 1–6.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl