Vol 88, No 8 (2017)
Research paper
Published online: 2017-08-31

open access

Page views 4173
Article views/downloads 3440
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Polyhydramnios — frequency of congenital anomalies in relation to the value of the amniotic fluid index

Jakub Kornacki1, Magdalena Adamczyk, Przemysław Wirstlein, Maciej Osiński, Ewa Wender-Ożegowska
Pubmed: 28930371
Ginekol Pol 2017;88(8):442-445.

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of our study were to assess the correlation between the amniotic fluid index (AFI) value and the frequency and type of fetal anomalies.

Material and methods: The material included 94 patients at the third trimester of pregnancy, 60 with mild polyhydramnios, 19 with moderate one, and 15 with severe one. Polyhydramnios was diagnosed if AFI was > 24 cm. All patients were divided into three groups based on the value of AFI: 1) mild polyhydramnios with AFI between 24.1 and 29.9 cm, 2) moderate polyhydramnios with AFI between 30–34.9 cm, and 3) severe polyhydramnios with AFI ≥ 35 cm.

Results: The incidence of fetal malformations correlated significantly with the degree of polyhydramnios and was the highest in patients with severe polyhydramnios (53.3%, p = 0.002). Congenital malformations of the gastrointestinal tract were the most frequent fetal anomalies in the whole group of patients (5.3%). Trisomy 18 was the most frequent aneuploidy found in women with polyhydramnios (2.1%).

Conclusions:

  1. The incidence of fetal congenital anomalies significantly increases with the degree of polyhydramnios, being most frequent in severe one and rather rare in a mild one.
  2. Congenital malformations of the gastrointestinal tract were the most frequent anomalies in patients with polyhy­dramnios, especially in women with severe polyhydramnios.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Stanescu AD, Banica R, Olaru G, et al. Idiopathic polyhydramnios and fetal gender. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 291(5): 987–991.
  2. Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. Chromosomal aberrations in idiopathic polyhydramnios: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Genet. 2015; 58(8): 409–415.
  3. Yeung Leung T, Hung Suen SS. Manipaulation of amniotic fluid volume:oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios. In: Kliby MD, Oepkes D, Johnson A. ed. Fetal therapy Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits. Cambridge Raven Press, New York 2013: 137–144.
  4. Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, et al. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39(6): 648–653.
  5. Morris RK, Meller CH, Tamblyn J, et al. Association and prediction of amniotic fluid measurements for adverse pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2014; 121(6): 686–699.
  6. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The prevalence of congenital anomalies in Europe. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010; 686: 349–364.
  7. Pasquini L, Seravalli V, Sisti G, et al. Prevalence of a positive TORCH and parvovirus B19 screening in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36(3): 290–293.
  8. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, et al. A review of idiopathic hydramnios and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007; 62(12): 795–802.
  9. Harman CR. Amniotic fluid abnormalities. Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32(4): 288–294.
  10. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, et al. Hydramnios: anomaly prevalence and sonographic detection. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100(1): 134–139.
  11. Kleine RT, Bernardes LS, Carvalho MA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in severe polyhydramnios: no increase in risk in patients needing amnioreduction for maternal pain or respiratory distress. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(24): 4031–4034.
  12. Boito S, Crovetto F, Ischia B, et al. Prenatal ultrasound factors and genetic disorders in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36(8): 726–730.
  13. Yefet E, Daniel-Spiegel E. Outcomes From Polyhydramnios With Normal Ultrasound. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(2): e20151948.