open access
Varicella — a potential threat to maternal and fetal health
open access
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the following: i) number of midwives and nurses at risk for contracting varicella; ii) effectiveness of infectious disease prevention among healthcare personnel; iii) attitude of healthcare personnel towards immunization.
Material and methods: A total of 524 midwives and nurses from obstetric, neonatal, and pediatric wards were investigated. Quantitative data analysis was performed.
Results: Overall, 14.7% potentially seronegative respondents were identified. Out of those with a positive history of varicella, 6.56% contracted the disease after starting work, and > 70% had contact with the varicella-zoster virus. Overall, 9.54% of the respondents had a history of varicella, 3.12% were informed about the possibility of immunization, and 1.56% of those with a negative history of the disease were offered a state-funded vaccine. In the same group, the number of vaccinated people amounted to 13.28%, and 26.13% would accept a state-funded vaccine.
Conclusions: Varicella may constitute a significant threat to maternal and fetal health at obstetric, neonatal, and pediatric wards, which must be considered when providing care to women in the reproductive age. Occupational health physicians should confirm the immunity status of the patients and suggest immunization to seronegative subjects. Regular workshops are necessary to update the knowledge of medical professionals and patients in order to shape their attitudes and beliefs about immunization.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the following: i) number of midwives and nurses at risk for contracting varicella; ii) effectiveness of infectious disease prevention among healthcare personnel; iii) attitude of healthcare personnel towards immunization.
Material and methods: A total of 524 midwives and nurses from obstetric, neonatal, and pediatric wards were investigated. Quantitative data analysis was performed.
Results: Overall, 14.7% potentially seronegative respondents were identified. Out of those with a positive history of varicella, 6.56% contracted the disease after starting work, and > 70% had contact with the varicella-zoster virus. Overall, 9.54% of the respondents had a history of varicella, 3.12% were informed about the possibility of immunization, and 1.56% of those with a negative history of the disease were offered a state-funded vaccine. In the same group, the number of vaccinated people amounted to 13.28%, and 26.13% would accept a state-funded vaccine.
Conclusions: Varicella may constitute a significant threat to maternal and fetal health at obstetric, neonatal, and pediatric wards, which must be considered when providing care to women in the reproductive age. Occupational health physicians should confirm the immunity status of the patients and suggest immunization to seronegative subjects. Regular workshops are necessary to update the knowledge of medical professionals and patients in order to shape their attitudes and beliefs about immunization.
Keywords
varicella, infection, obstetric care, healthcare personnel
About this articleTitle
Varicella — a potential threat to maternal and fetal health
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
13-19
Published online
2017-01-31
Page views
2282
Article views/downloads
2066
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2017;88(1):13-19.
Keywords
varicella
infection
obstetric care
healthcare personnel
Authors
Maria Biskupska
Ilona Małecka
Joanna Stryczyńska-Kazubska
Jacek Wysocki
References (35)- Sydnor E, Perl TM. Healthcare providers as sources of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccine. 2014; 32(38): 4814–4822.
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Varicella vaccination in the European Union. Stockholm ECDC. ; 2015.
- Sengupta N, Booy R, Schmitt HJ, et al. Varicella vaccination in Europe: are we ready for a universal childhood programme? Eur. J. Pediatr. 2008; 167(1): 47–55.
- Bonanni P, Breuer J, Gershon A, et al. Varicella vaccination in Europe - taking the practical approach. BMC Med. 2009; 7: 26.
- Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Carrington D, et al. Varicella-zoster virus (chickenpox) infection in pregnancy. BJOG. 2011; 118(10): 1155–1162.
- World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological record, Varicella and herpes zoster vaccines, WHO position paper, June. 2014; 25: 20.
- Kołton R. Ospa wietrzna na oddziale położniczym. http://www mp pl/szczepienia/aktualnosci/91267,ospa-wietrzna-na-oddziale-polozniczym (access: 2016 09. ; 10.
- Daley AJ, Thorpe S, Garland SM. Varicella and the pregnant woman: prevention and management. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 48(1): 26–33.
- Sarit S, Shruti S, Deepinder C, et al. Chicken pox outbreak in the Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital: Lessons learnt the hard way. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015; 19(12): 723–725.
- Yang HK, Song KM, Manoff S, et al. Burden of Varicella in Eastern Europe: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis. Value in Health. 2013; 16(7): A342–A343.
- Sadowska-Galera M. Wstępne wyniki i ocena poziomu przeciwciał w klasie IgG dla wirusów odry, świnki, różyczki, ospy wietrznej, w grupie młodzieży urodzonej w 1989 roku. Przegl Epidemiol. 2009; 63: 365–369.
- Siennicka J, Trzcinska A, Rosinska M, et al. PI-1 Seroprevalence study of varicella-zoster in the Polish population. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2009; 46: S15.
- Helmuth IG, Poulsen A, Suppli CH, et al. Varicella in Europe-A review of the epidemiology and experience with vaccination. Vaccine. 2015; 33(21): 2406–2413.
- Rimseliene G, Vainio K, Gibory M, et al. Varicella-zoster virus susceptibility and primary healthcare consultations in Norway. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016; 16: 254.
- Cohen DI, Davidovici BB, Smetana Z, et al. Seroepidemiology of Varicella zoster in Israel prior to large-scale use of varicella vaccines. Infection. 2006; 34(4): 208–213.
- Toikkanen SE, Baillot A, Dreesman J, et al. Seroprevalence of Antibodies against Measles, Rubella and Varicella among Asylum Seekers Arriving in Lower Saxony, Germany, November 2014-October 2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(7).
- Gorny AW, Mittal C, Saw S, et al. Varicella seroprevalence in healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital: an audit of cross-sectional data. BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8: 664.
- Black AP, Vilivong K, Nouanthong P, et al. Serosurveillance of vaccine preventable diseases and hepatitis C in healthcare workers from Lao PDR. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(4): e0123647.
- Talebi-Taher M, Noori M, Shamshiri AR, et al. Varicella Zoster antibodies among health care workers in a university hospital, Teheran, Iran. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2010; 23(1): 27–32.
- Bakri FG, Abdelrahim ZM, Alkalbani AS, [at al]. Seroprevalence of measles, rubella, and varicella among physicians and nurses in Jordan. Turk J Med Sci. 2016, 46, 614-619. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1502-115.
- Aypak C, Bayram Y, Eren H, et al. Susceptibility to measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella-zoster viruses among healthcare workers. J Nippon Med Sch. 2012; 79(6): 453–458.
- Vandersmissen G, Moens G, Vranckx R, et al. Occupational risk of infection by varicella zoster virus in Belgian healthcare workers: a seroprevalence study. Occup Environ Med. 2000; 57(9): 621–626.
- Fedeli U, Zanetti C, Saia B. Susceptibility of healthcare workers to measles, mumps rubella and varicella. J. Hosp. Infect. 2002; 51(2): 133–135.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization of health care personnel: recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (AICP) MMWR. 2011; 60: 1–145.
- Jackowska T, Chybicka A, Czajka H, et al. Rekomendacje zespołu ekspertów dotyczące stosowania dwudawkowego schematu szczepień przeciw ospie wietrznej. Pediatria Polska. 2010; 85(3): 243–250.
- Komunikat Głównego Inspektora Sanitarnego z dnia 16 października 2015 r. w sprawie Programu Szczepień Ochronnych na rok 2016 ( poz. . .dziennik. 63) http://www dziennikmz mz gov pl/DUM_MZ/2015/63/akt pdf (access: 2016 09. ; 10.
- Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 20 września 2012 r. w sprawie standardów postępowania medycznego przy udzielaniu świadczeń zdrowotnych z zakresu opieki okołoporodowej sprawowanej nad kobietą w okresie fizjologicznej ciąży, fizjologicznego porodu, połogu oraz opieki nad noworodkiem (Dz. U nr 12 poz. 1100; 2012.
- Czajkowski K, Bręborowicz G, Kotarski J. at al] Rekomendacje zespołu ekspertów Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczące opieki okołoporodowej i prowadzenia porodu (lipiec 2009). In: Spaczyński M (ed.) Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego 2006-2011. Książka dla lekarzy, studentów, pielęgniarek i położnych. Ginekologia Polska Pozna. ; 2012: 128–136.
- Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia i Opieki Społecznej z dnia 30 maja 1996r. w sprawie przeprowadzania badań lekarskich pracowników, zakresu profilaktycznej opieki zdrowotnej nad pracownikami oraz orzeczeń lekarskich wydawanych do celów przewidzianych w Kodeksie Pracy (Dz. U nr 69, poz 332. ; 1996.
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Infectious diseases of specific relevance to newly-arrived migrants in the EU/EEA – 19 November 2015. ECDC. Stockholm 2015.
- Ołpiński M. Anti-Vaccination Movement and Parental Refusals of Immunization of Children in USA. Pediatria Polska. 2012; 87(4): 381–385.
- Herzog R, Álvarez-Pasquin MJ, Díaz C, et al. Are healthcare workers' intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 154.
- van Lier A, Tostmann A, Harmsen IA, et al. Negative attitude and low intention to vaccinate universally against varicella among public health professionals and parents in the Netherlands: two internet surveys. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016; 16: 127.
- Harmsen IA, Bos H, Ruiter RAC, et al. Vaccination decision-making of immigrant parents in the Netherlands; a focus group study. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 1229.
- Benoit G, Etchemendigaray C, Nguyen-Xuan HT, et al. Management of varicella-zoster virus primary infection during pregnancy: A national survey of practice. J. Clin. Virol. 2015; 72: 4–10.
