open access

Vol 91, No 6 (2020)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Published online: 2020-06-30
Get Citation

Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians for removal of the uterus by vaginal, laparoscopic and abdominal routes

Rafal Stojko, Andrzej Malinowski, Wlodzimierz Baranowski, Marcin Misiek, Ewa Winkowska, Michal Pomorski, Mariusz Zimmer
DOI: 10.5603/GP.2020.0081
·
Pubmed: 32627157
·
Ginekol Pol 2020;91(6):352-361.

open access

Vol 91, No 6 (2020)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Published online: 2020-06-30

Abstract

The recommendations represent the current procedure, which may be modified and changed where justified, after a thorough
analysis of the given clinical situation, which may be the basis for their modification and updating in the future.

Abstract

The recommendations represent the current procedure, which may be modified and changed where justified, after a thorough
analysis of the given clinical situation, which may be the basis for their modification and updating in the future.

Get Citation

Keywords

hysterectomy; transvaginal; laparoscopic

About this article
Title

Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians for removal of the uterus by vaginal, laparoscopic and abdominal routes

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 91, No 6 (2020)

Pages

352-361

Published online

2020-06-30

DOI

10.5603/GP.2020.0081

Pubmed

32627157

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2020;91(6):352-361.

Keywords

hysterectomy
transvaginal
laparoscopic

Authors

Rafal Stojko
Andrzej Malinowski
Wlodzimierz Baranowski
Marcin Misiek
Ewa Winkowska
Michal Pomorski
Mariusz Zimmer

References (25)
  1. Committee Opinion No. 701. The route of hysterectomy for benign disease. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 155–159.
  2. Miskry T, Magos A. A national survey of senior trainees surgical experience in hysterectomy and attitudes to the place of vaginal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2004; 111(8): 877–879.
  3. Aarts J, Nieboer T, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015.
  4. Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy; Clinical Practice Gynaecology Committee and Executive Committee and Council, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002; 24(1): 37–61.
  5. Garry R. The future of hysterectomy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005; 112(2).
  6. Reich H. Laparoscopic oophorectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in the treatment of benign tubo-ovarian disease. Int J Fertil. 1987; 32(3): 233–236.
  7. Mettler L, Semm K, Lehmann-Willenbrock L, et al. Comparative evaluation of classical intrafascial-supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) with transuterine mucosal resection as performed by pelviscopy and laparotomy--our first 200 cases. Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(4): 418–423.
  8. Miskry T, Magos A. Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82(4): 351–358.
  9. Kala E, Stojko R, Sadlocha M. Hysterectomy costs depending on operational technique. Ginekol Pol. 2018; 89(12): 672–676.
  10. S RK. 28 Years of Using Hysterectomy Guidelines to Determine the Feasibility of Vaginal Hysterectomy. Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2015; 06(04).
  11. Chrysostomou A, Djokovic D, Edridge W, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for vaginal hysterectomy of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 231: 262–267.
  12. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(5): 1156–1158.
  13. Cho HY, Park ST, Kim HB, et al. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21(1): 115–119.
  14. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(2 Pt 1): 233–241.
  15. Zimmer M, Pomorski M, Kamiński P, et al. Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Guidelines for the application of hysteroscopy in gynecology. Ginekologia Polska. 2019; 90(8): 482–489.
  16. Shiota M, Kotani Y, Umemoto M, et al. Indication for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. JSLS. 2011; 15(3): 343–345.
  17. Pölcher M, Hauptmann S, Fotopoulou C, et al. Kommission Ovar of the Gynecologic Oncology Study Group (AGO). Should Fallopian Tubes Be Removed During Hysterectomy Procedures? - A Statement by AGO Ovar. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015; 75(4): 339–341.
  18. Doucette RC, Sharp HT, Alder SC. Challenging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184(7): 1386–9; discussion 1390.
  19. Sirota I, Tomita SA, Dabney L, et al. Overcoming barriers to vaginal hysterectomy: An analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019; 20(1): 8–14.
  20. Tohic ALe, Dhainaut C, Yazbeck C, et al. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology among women without previous vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111(4): 829–837.
  21. Veress J. Neues Instrument zur Ausführung von Brust- und Bauchpunktionen und Pneumothoraxbehandlung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1938; 64: 1480–1.
  22. Mettler L, Semm K, Semm K. Hysterectomy via laparotomy or pelviscopy. A new CASH method without colpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1991; 51(12): 996–1003.
  23. Malinowski A, Makowska J, Antosiak B. [Total laparoscopic hysterectomy--indications and complications of 158 patients]. Ginekol Pol. 2013; 84(4): 252–257.
  24. O'Hanlan KA, Dibble SL, Garnier AC, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and complications of 830 cases. JSLS. 2007; 11(1): 45–53.
  25. Laparoscopic Surgery. Management of Laparoscopic Surgical Complications. 2013: 1–7.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl