open access

Vol 91, No 4 (2020)
Research paper
Published online: 2020-04-29
Get Citation

Myoelectrical activity of muscles stabilizing the sacroiliac joints before and after the use of elastic tapes in women suffering from Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain

Natalia Kuciel1, Edyta Sutkowska1, Anna Cienska2, Dominika Markowska3, Zdzislawa Wrzosek4
·
Pubmed: 32374023
·
Ginekol Pol 2020;91(4):223-230.
Affiliations
  1. Department and Division of Medical Rehabilitation, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
  2. Fizis. Functional Rehabilitation, Wroclaw, Poland
  3. Department of Physiotherapy in Internal Diseases, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland
  4. Department of Physiotherapy in Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Surgery, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland

open access

Vol 91, No 4 (2020)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Obstetrics
Published online: 2020-04-29

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was the analysis of activity of selected muscles stabilizing the sacroiliac joints in pregnant
women suffering from pelvic pain and changes in the pattern in response to the implementation of Kinesio Taping
(elastic tape).
Material and methods: Seventeen women with Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain and 20 pregnant women without
pain in the lumbar-pelvic complex were enrolled into the study. In patients with pelvic pain, the parameters describing the
action of the muscles were assessed: before the tape was applied, immediately after application, 3 days into application
and 5 days after the cessation of taping. In the control group, the test was carried out one time. The activity of the muscles
was measured during extension of the hip from a four-point kneeling position.
Results: The gluteus maximus muscle shows higher resting activity values than in the control group, before and after application
of the tape as well as five days after the removal of the tape. Before application, the gluteus maximus activates
quicker than in the control group while the ipsilateral extensor spinae had a delayed activation when compared to the
control group.
Conclusions: The patterns of activation of tested muscles and their action potential values are different in the group
of women with pelvic pain compared to the group without pelvic pain. The application of KT in the lumbar region appears
to alter the activation of the GM muscle as well as improve activation of IES muscle during hip extension from the
four-point-kneeling position.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was the analysis of activity of selected muscles stabilizing the sacroiliac joints in pregnant
women suffering from pelvic pain and changes in the pattern in response to the implementation of Kinesio Taping
(elastic tape).
Material and methods: Seventeen women with Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain and 20 pregnant women without
pain in the lumbar-pelvic complex were enrolled into the study. In patients with pelvic pain, the parameters describing the
action of the muscles were assessed: before the tape was applied, immediately after application, 3 days into application
and 5 days after the cessation of taping. In the control group, the test was carried out one time. The activity of the muscles
was measured during extension of the hip from a four-point kneeling position.
Results: The gluteus maximus muscle shows higher resting activity values than in the control group, before and after application
of the tape as well as five days after the removal of the tape. Before application, the gluteus maximus activates
quicker than in the control group while the ipsilateral extensor spinae had a delayed activation when compared to the
control group.
Conclusions: The patterns of activation of tested muscles and their action potential values are different in the group
of women with pelvic pain compared to the group without pelvic pain. The application of KT in the lumbar region appears
to alter the activation of the GM muscle as well as improve activation of IES muscle during hip extension from the
four-point-kneeling position.

Get Citation

Keywords

pelvic pain; back pain; electromyography; pregnancy; motor activity

About this article
Title

Myoelectrical activity of muscles stabilizing the sacroiliac joints before and after the use of elastic tapes in women suffering from Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 91, No 4 (2020)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

223-230

Published online

2020-04-29

Page views

1840

Article views/downloads

1648

DOI

10.5603/GP.2020.0044

Pubmed

32374023

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2020;91(4):223-230.

Keywords

pelvic pain
back pain
electromyography
pregnancy
motor activity

Authors

Natalia Kuciel
Edyta Sutkowska
Anna Cienska
Dominika Markowska
Zdzislawa Wrzosek

References (34)
  1. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, et al. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(6): 794–819.
  2. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(7): 575–589.
  3. Nilsson-Wikmar L, Holm K, Oijerstedt R, et al. Effect of three different physical therapy treatments on pain and activity in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up postpartum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(8): 850–856.
  4. Kanakaris NK, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update. BMC Med. 2011; 9: 15.
  5. Pierce H, Homer CSE, Dahlen HG, et al. Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: listening to Australian women. Nurs Res Pract. 2012; 2012: 387428.
  6. Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CHG, et al. Etiology and prognosis of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain; design of a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2005; 5: 1.
  7. Kuciel N, Sutkowska E, Cienska A, et al. Impact of Kinesio Taping application on pregnant women suffering from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain - preliminary study. Ginekol Pol. 2017; 88(11): 620–625.
  8. Gutke A, Betten C, Degerskär K, et al. Treatments for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015; 94(11): 1156–1167.
  9. Liddle S, Pennick V. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015.
  10. Kiebzak W, Kowalski I, Pawłowski M, et al. The use of Kinesiology Taping in physiotherapy practice: a systematic review of the literature. Polish Journal of Physiotherapy. 2012; 12(1): 1–11.
  11. Morris D, Jones D, Ryan H, et al. The clinical effects of Kinesio® Tex taping: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013; 29(4): 259–270.
  12. Soderberg GL, Knutson LM. A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(5): 485–498.
  13. Ghofrani M, Olyaei G, Talebian S, et al. Reliability of SEMG measurements for trunk muscles during lifting variable loads in healthy subjects. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017; 21(3): 711–718.
  14. Yasukawa A, Patel P, Sisung C. Pilot study: investigating the effects of Kinesio Taping in an acute pediatric rehabilitation setting. Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60(1): 104–110.
  15. Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9(2): 161–166.
  16. Gutke A, Hansson ER, Zetherström G, et al. Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(7): 1008–1012.
  17. Koumantakis GA, Oldham JA, Winstanley J. Intermittent isometric fatigue study of the lumbar multifidus muscle in four-point kneeling: an intra-rater reliability investigation. Man Ther. 2001; 6(2): 97–105.
  18. Kielnar R, Oleksy Ł, Grzegorczyk J. Różnicowanie napięć bioelektrycznych mięśni przykręgosłupowych u aktywnych seniorów przy użyciu powierzchniowego EMG. Rehabil Med. 2012; 16(3): 9–15.
  19. Sipko T, Grygier D, Barczyk K, et al. The occurrence of strain symptoms in the lumbosacral region and pelvis during pregnancy and after childbirth. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010; 33(5): 370–377.
  20. van Wingerden JP, Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, et al. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(3): 199–205.
  21. van Wingerden JP, Vleeming A, Ronchetti I. Differences in standing and forward bending in women with chronic low back or pelvic girdle pain: indications for physical compensation strategies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(11): E334–E341.
  22. Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, et al. Insufficient lumbopelvic stability: a clinical, anatomical and biomechanical approach to 'a-specific' low back pain. Man Ther. 1998; 3(1): 12–20.
  23. Biering K, Nøhr EA, Olsen J, et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic pain is more frequent in women with increased body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90(10): 1132–1139.
  24. Mogren IM. BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(7): 1093–1102.
  25. Barker PJ, Hapuarachchi KS, Ross JA, et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of gluteus maximus and the thoracolumbar fascia at the sacroiliac joint. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(2): 234–240.
  26. Wu WT, Hong CZ, Chou LW. The Kinesio Taping Method for Myofascial Pain Control. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015; 2015: 950519.
  27. Sihvonen T, Huttunen M, Makkonen M, et al. Functional changes in back muscle activity correlate with pain intensity and prediction of low back pain during pregnancy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79(10): 1210–1212.
  28. Bruno P, Bagust J, Cook J, et al. An investigation into the activation patterns of back and hip muscles during prone hip extension in non-low back pain subjects: Normal vs. abnormal lumbar spine motion patterns. Clinical Chiropractic. 2008; 11(1): 4–14.
  29. Biau DJ, Kernéis S, Porcher R. Statistics in brief: the importance of sample size in the planning and interpretation of medical research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(9): 2282–2288.
  30. Neblett R, Brede E, Mayer TG, et al. What is the best surface EMG measure of lumbar flexion-relaxation for distinguishing chronic low back pain patients from pain-free controls? Clin J Pain. 2013; 29(4): 334–340.
  31. De Blaiser C, De Ridder R, Willems T, et al. Evaluating abdominal core muscle fatigue: Assessment of the validity and reliability of the prone bridging test. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018; 28(2): 391–399.
  32. Vera-Garcia FJ, Moreside JM, McGill SM. MVC techniques to normalize trunk muscle EMG in healthy women. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20(1): 10–16.
  33. Lehman GJ, Lennon D, Tresidder B, et al. Muscle recruitment patterns during the prone leg extension. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004; 5: 3.
  34. Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P. Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(14): 1593–1600.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl