open access

Vol 90, No 11 (2019)
Research paper
Published online: 2019-11-28
Get Citation

Use of electrical impedance spectroscopy as an adjunct to colposcopy in a pathway of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnostics

Wojciech Homola1, Tomasz Fuchs1, Pawel Baranski1, Aleksandra Zimmer1, Mariusz Zimmer1, Michal Pomorski1
·
Pubmed: 31802462
·
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(11):628-632.
Affiliations
  1. Second Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

open access

Vol 90, No 11 (2019)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2019-11-28

Abstract

Objectives: Screening with cytology decreases cervical cancer burden, but new methods have emerged. We assessed the diagnostic value of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the real-world gynecological setting. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic usefulness of EIS used as an adjunct to colposcopies in the diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in women with abnormal cytology findings.

Material and methods: A cross-sectional, single center, observational study considered 143 women. All were subjected to a colposcopy and EIS with ZedScan. ZedScan-guided or colposcopically-guided biopsies were carried out.

Results: Data from 118 women were analyzed. The average age of the included women was 38.29 } 12.52 years (range: 22–86 years). Overall, 27 had a diagnosis of CIN2+ and above on histopathological examination, 99 had low-grade colposcopy results, 18 had high-grade colposcopy results, and 80 had positive ZedScan examination. No adverse events related to the examination with ZedScan were observed. EIS used as an adjunct to colposcopies showed sensitivity of 96.30% (95% CI: 81.03–99.91) and specificity of 39.56% (95% CI: 29.46–50.36), and accuracy of 52.54% (95% CI: 43.15–61.81). The procedure allowed to detect 11 additional cases with positive histo-pathological result in comparison to colposcopies alone.

Conclusions: Colposcopies performed with ZedScan as an adjunct were effective in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. Advantages of ZedScan include real-time result display, no additional diagnostic burden posed on the patient, and good safety profile. Studies on large patient cohorts are needed for further evaluations of this diagnostic procedure and factors which may affect its diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract

Objectives: Screening with cytology decreases cervical cancer burden, but new methods have emerged. We assessed the diagnostic value of electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in the real-world gynecological setting. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic usefulness of EIS used as an adjunct to colposcopies in the diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in women with abnormal cytology findings.

Material and methods: A cross-sectional, single center, observational study considered 143 women. All were subjected to a colposcopy and EIS with ZedScan. ZedScan-guided or colposcopically-guided biopsies were carried out.

Results: Data from 118 women were analyzed. The average age of the included women was 38.29 } 12.52 years (range: 22–86 years). Overall, 27 had a diagnosis of CIN2+ and above on histopathological examination, 99 had low-grade colposcopy results, 18 had high-grade colposcopy results, and 80 had positive ZedScan examination. No adverse events related to the examination with ZedScan were observed. EIS used as an adjunct to colposcopies showed sensitivity of 96.30% (95% CI: 81.03–99.91) and specificity of 39.56% (95% CI: 29.46–50.36), and accuracy of 52.54% (95% CI: 43.15–61.81). The procedure allowed to detect 11 additional cases with positive histo-pathological result in comparison to colposcopies alone.

Conclusions: Colposcopies performed with ZedScan as an adjunct were effective in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. Advantages of ZedScan include real-time result display, no additional diagnostic burden posed on the patient, and good safety profile. Studies on large patient cohorts are needed for further evaluations of this diagnostic procedure and factors which may affect its diagnostic accuracy.

Get Citation

Keywords

electrical impedance spectroscopy; colposcopy; squamous intraepithelial lesions; sensitivity; specificity; predictive value

About this article
Title

Use of electrical impedance spectroscopy as an adjunct to colposcopy in a pathway of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnostics

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 90, No 11 (2019)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

628-632

Published online

2019-11-28

Page views

1069

Article views/downloads

836

DOI

10.5603/GP.2019.0107

Pubmed

31802462

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2019;90(11):628-632.

Keywords

electrical impedance spectroscopy
colposcopy
squamous intraepithelial lesions
sensitivity
specificity
predictive value

Authors

Wojciech Homola
Tomasz Fuchs
Pawel Baranski
Aleksandra Zimmer
Mariusz Zimmer
Michal Pomorski

References (22)
  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424.
  2. PNCR. Polish National Cancer Registry. www.onkologia.org.pl (17.02.2019).
  3. Green J, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Sweetland S, et al. Risk factors for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in women aged 20-44 years: the UK National Case-Control Study of Cervical Cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003; 89(11): 2078–2086.
  4. Lees BF, Erickson BK, Huh WK. Cervical cancer screening: evidence behind the guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214(4): 438–443.
  5. Wojciech R. The diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Ginekol Pol. 2011; 82(8): 607–611.
  6. Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, et al. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91(4): 626–631.
  7. Brown BH, Tidy JA, Boston K, et al. Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia. Lancet. 2000; 355(9207): 892–895.
  8. Braun RP, Mangana J, Goldinger S, et al. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Skin Cancer Diagnosis. Dermatol Clin. 2017; 35(4): 489–493.
  9. Balasubramani L, Brown BH, Healey J, et al. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by electrical impedance spectroscopy: the effects of acetic acid and tissue homogeneity. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115(2): 267–271.
  10. Kim HW, Yun J, Lee JZ, et al. Evaluation of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy-on-a-Needle as a Novel Tool to Determine Optimal Surgical Margin in Partial Nephrectomy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017; 6(18).
  11. Prakash S, Karnes MP, Sequin EK, et al. Ex vivo electrical impedance measurements on excised hepatic tissue from human patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Physiol Meas. 2015; 36(2): 315–328.
  12. Tidy JA, Brown BH, Healey TJ, et al. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy. BJOG. 2013; 120(4): 400–410.
  13. Peron M, Llewellyn A, Moe-Byrne T, et al. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for assessing suspected cervical abnormalities: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22(54): 1–260.
  14. Muszynski C, Dupont E, Vaysse B, et al. The impact of using electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan) on the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing high grade squamous lesions of the cervix. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017; 46(9): 669–673.
  15. Macdonald MC, Brown BH, Lyon RE, et al. Influence of high risk HPV genotype on colposcopic performance: A large prospective study demonstrates improved detection of disease with ZedScan I, particularly in non-HPV 16 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 211: 194–198.
  16. Tidy JA, Brown BH, Lyon RE, et al. Are colposcopy and electrical impedance spectroscopy complementary when used to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia? Eur J Gyn Oncol. 2018; 39(1): 70–75.
  17. NICE. Diagnostics guidance [DG32]. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for assessing suspected cervical abnormalities: the DYSIS colposcope with DYSISmap and the ZedScan I. https://www.nice.org.uk (30.05.2019).
  18. Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, et al. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; 111(9): 923–932.
  19. Li D, Chen L, Wang H, et al. Clinical application of a rapid cervical cancer screening method: Folate receptor-mediated staining of cervical neoplastic epithelia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017; 13(1): 44–52.
  20. Li D, Chen L, Wang H, et al. Clinical application of a rapid cervical cancer screening method: Folate receptor-mediated staining of cervical neoplastic epithelia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017; 13(1): 44–52.
  21. Dai Y, Wang L, Li D. Effectiveness of novel folate receptor-mediated staining solution detection (FRD) for cervical cancer screening. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(34): e11868.
  22. Zhao Y, Li M, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of Folate Receptor-Mediated Cervical Dyeing as a Method for Detection of Cervical Lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019; 23(2): 133–137.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl