open access
Donor human milk in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit — to whom, how much and how long?
, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
Affiliations- Departament of Neonatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
open access
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to present the variability of patients who received donor human milk (DHM) during Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization, including time of its usage and volume of portions.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of data was conducted for all infants admitted to the NICU at the University Hospital during the first year of the Human Milk Bank operation. One-way analysis of variance in the intergroup scheme, Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis with the Jonckheere-Tepstra test, correlation analysis using Pearson’s r and Spearmann’s rho, frequency analysis using the Fisher’s exact test were used to conduct analyses.
Results: 133 newborns received DHM. 3 groups of neonates were identified: < 32 0/7 weeks, 32 0/7–36 6/7 weeks and > 37 0/7 weeks of gestational age (GA). Time of DHM supplementation was similar in all groups and does not differ depending on the GA but preterm infants received the smallest total volume of DHM. However, infants > 37 weeks of GA had almost a threefold greater chance of abandoning breastfeeding than the others (odds ratio (OR) = 2.89, 95% CI: 0.69–12.20). There was a statistically significant, weak negative correlation between period of total parenteral nutrition and the volume of milk from the bank: rho = –0.194; p = 0.026.
Conclusions: The DHM supply did not have a negative impact on lactation and breastfeeding. Stimulation of lactation was necessary for 5–7 days. The time of DHM supply was the same regardless of GA. The majority of infants were breastfed or received only MOM on the day of discharge from the hospital.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to present the variability of patients who received donor human milk (DHM) during Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization, including time of its usage and volume of portions.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of data was conducted for all infants admitted to the NICU at the University Hospital during the first year of the Human Milk Bank operation. One-way analysis of variance in the intergroup scheme, Kruskal-Wallis variance analysis with the Jonckheere-Tepstra test, correlation analysis using Pearson’s r and Spearmann’s rho, frequency analysis using the Fisher’s exact test were used to conduct analyses.
Results: 133 newborns received DHM. 3 groups of neonates were identified: < 32 0/7 weeks, 32 0/7–36 6/7 weeks and > 37 0/7 weeks of gestational age (GA). Time of DHM supplementation was similar in all groups and does not differ depending on the GA but preterm infants received the smallest total volume of DHM. However, infants > 37 weeks of GA had almost a threefold greater chance of abandoning breastfeeding than the others (odds ratio (OR) = 2.89, 95% CI: 0.69–12.20). There was a statistically significant, weak negative correlation between period of total parenteral nutrition and the volume of milk from the bank: rho = –0.194; p = 0.026.
Conclusions: The DHM supply did not have a negative impact on lactation and breastfeeding. Stimulation of lactation was necessary for 5–7 days. The time of DHM supply was the same regardless of GA. The majority of infants were breastfed or received only MOM on the day of discharge from the hospital.
Keywords
human milk bank; neonatal intensive care unit; neonate; preterm infant; breastfeeding
About this articleTitle
Donor human milk in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit — to whom, how much and how long?
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
534-538
Published online
2019-09-30
Page views
1562
Article views/downloads
1223
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(9):534-538.
Keywords
human milk bank
neonatal intensive care unit
neonate
preterm infant
breastfeeding
Authors
Izabela M. Lehman
Barbara Broers
Matylda Czosnykowska-Łukacka
Weronika Wesolowska
Lucyna Swiderska
Barbara Krolak-Olejnik
References (22)- WHO/UNICEF meeting on infant and young child feeding. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1980; 25(3): 31–38.
- WHO & UNICEF. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva, 2003.
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. 2012; 29(3): 827–841.
- Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, et al. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013; 57(4): 535–542.
- Moro GE, Arslanoglu S, Bertino E, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics, European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. XII. Human Milk in Feeding Premature Infants: Consensus Statement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015; 61 Suppl 1: S16–S19.
- Perrine CG, Scanlon KS. Prevalence of use of human milk in US advanced care neonatal units. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(6): 1066–1071.
- Arslanoglu S, Corpeleijn W, Moro G, et al. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Donor human milk for preterm infants: current evidence and research directions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013; 57(4): 535–542.
- WHO. Guidelines on Optimal Feeding of Low Birthweight Infants in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Geneva, 2011.
- Meier P, Patel A, Esquerra-Zwiers A. Donor Human Milk Update: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Priorities for Research and Practice. J Pediatr. 2017; 180: 15–21.
- Human Milk Banking Association of North America. https://www.hmbana.org/ (15.05.2018).
- COMMITTEE ON NUTRITION, SECTION ON BREASTFEEDING, COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. Donor Human Milk for the High-Risk Infant: Preparation, Safety, and Usage Options in the United States. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(1).
- Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, et al. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013; 163(6): 1592–1595.e1.
- Corpeleijn WE, de Waard M, Christmann V, et al. Effect of Donor Milk on Severe Infections and Mortality in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants: The Early Nutrition Study Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170(7): 654–661.
- Embleton ND. Early nutrition and later outcomes in preterm infants. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2013; 106: 26–32.
- Meier PP, Johnson TJ, Patel AL, et al. Evidence-Based Methods That Promote Human Milk Feeding of Preterm Infants: An Expert Review. Clin Perinatol. 2017; 44(1): 1–22.
- Boyce C, Watson M, Lazidis G, et al. Preterm human milk composition: a systematic literature review. Br J Nutr. 2016; 116(6): 1033–1045.
- Castellote C, Casillas R, Ramírez-Santana C, et al. Premature delivery influences the immunological composition of colostrum and transitional and mature human milk. J Nutr. 2011; 141(6): 1181–1187.
- Simpson JH, McKerracher L, Cooper A, et al. Optimal Distribution and Utilization of Donated Human Breast Milk. J Hum Lact. 2016; 32(4): 730–734.
- Kohler JA, Perkins AM, Bass WT. Human milk versus formula after gastroschisis repair: effects on time to full feeds and time to discharge. J Perinatol. 2013; 33(8): 627–630.
- Arslanoglu S, Moro GE, Bellù R, et al. Presence of human milk bank is associated with elevated rate of exclusive breastfeeding in VLBW infants. J Perinat Med. 2013; 41(2): 129–131.
- de Halleux V, Pieltain C, Senterre T, et al. Use of donor milk in the neonatal intensive care unit. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22(1): 23–29.
- Geddes D, Perrella S. Breastfeeding and Human Lactation. Nutrients. 2019; 11(4).
