open access

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)
Review paper
Published online: 2019-08-30
Get Citation

Pregnant surgeon — assessment of potential harm to the woman and her unborn child

Aleksandra Szczesna1, Kinga Grzelak1, Monika Bieniasz2, Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik3, Agnieszka Dobrowolska-Redo3, Pawel Bartnik3, Julia Zareba-Szczudlik3, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz3
·
Pubmed: 31482551
·
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(8):470-474.
Affiliations
  1. Students’ Scientific Group affiliated to 2nd Chair and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  2. Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  3. 2nd Chair and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

open access

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)
REVIEW PAPERS Obstetrics
Published online: 2019-08-30

Abstract

Although most countries developed regulations concerning pregnant women at work, they are not strictly adjusted for every profession. In the European countries directives prevent pregnant women from working during night shifts, but apart from a vague paragraph about avoiding hazardous agents, there are no guidelines specific for pregnant surgeons. The aim of the study was to analyse the risks and consequences of working in the operating theatre during pregnancy. An in-depth analysis of available literature, laws and regulations concerning health and safety of pregnant surgeons was performed. Not only they are surgeons exposed to radiation and infectious agents like any other physicians, but they also face the risk of strenuous physical activity affecting their pregnancy. The unpredictability of this occupation, prolonged hours and stress associated with work can all affect the future mother and her child. The available research on potential risks for pregnant women performing surgical activities named such consequences as premature birth, miscarriage, foetal growth retardation, hypertensive disorders and infertility. There are no unanimous guidelines for pregnant surgeons on how long and to which extent they should work. The key is to maintain a balance between limiting the likelihood of pregnancy complications and respecting women’s voluntary wish to continue professional development.

Abstract

Although most countries developed regulations concerning pregnant women at work, they are not strictly adjusted for every profession. In the European countries directives prevent pregnant women from working during night shifts, but apart from a vague paragraph about avoiding hazardous agents, there are no guidelines specific for pregnant surgeons. The aim of the study was to analyse the risks and consequences of working in the operating theatre during pregnancy. An in-depth analysis of available literature, laws and regulations concerning health and safety of pregnant surgeons was performed. Not only they are surgeons exposed to radiation and infectious agents like any other physicians, but they also face the risk of strenuous physical activity affecting their pregnancy. The unpredictability of this occupation, prolonged hours and stress associated with work can all affect the future mother and her child. The available research on potential risks for pregnant women performing surgical activities named such consequences as premature birth, miscarriage, foetal growth retardation, hypertensive disorders and infertility. There are no unanimous guidelines for pregnant surgeons on how long and to which extent they should work. The key is to maintain a balance between limiting the likelihood of pregnancy complications and respecting women’s voluntary wish to continue professional development.

Get Citation

Keywords

fetal development; pregnancy; reproductive behaviour; surgeons; surgery

About this article
Title

Pregnant surgeon — assessment of potential harm to the woman and her unborn child

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

470-474

Published online

2019-08-30

Page views

1479

Article views/downloads

2125

DOI

10.5603/GP.2019.0081

Pubmed

31482551

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2019;90(8):470-474.

Keywords

fetal development
pregnancy
reproductive behaviour
surgeons
surgery

Authors

Aleksandra Szczesna
Kinga Grzelak
Monika Bieniasz
Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik
Agnieszka Dobrowolska-Redo
Pawel Bartnik
Julia Zareba-Szczudlik
Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz

References (33)
  1. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Directive 92/85/EEC - pregnant workers. https://osha.europa.eu/pl/legislation/directives/10. (14th January 2019).
  2. Knieper C, Ramsauer B, Hancke K, et al. "Pregnant and Operating": Evaluation of a Germany-wide Survey Among Female Gynaecologists and Surgeons. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014; 74(9): 875–880.
  3. Bonzini M, Coggon D, Palmer KT. Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64(4): 228–243.
  4. Pico K, Gioe TJ, Vanheest A, et al. Do men outperform women during orthopaedic residency training? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(7): 1804–1808.
  5. Baerlocher MO. Does sex affect residency application to surgery? Can J Surg. 2007; 50(6): 434–436.
  6. Kerr HL, Armstrong LA, Cade JE. Barriers to becoming a female surgeon and the influence of female surgical role models. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92(1092): 576–580.
  7. Mayer KL, Ho HS, Goodnight JE. Childbearing and child care in surgery. Arch Surg. 2001; 136(6): 649–655.
  8. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service. Applications and acceptances for types of higher education course — 2017. https://www.ucas.com/corporate/data-and-analysis/ucas-undergraduate-releases/ucas-undergraduate-end-cycle-data-resources/applications-and-acceptances-types-higher-education-course-2017 (14th January 2019).
  9. Directive 92/85/EEC - pregnant workers on the EU Agency for Safety and& Health at work, 2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum:c10914 (14th January 2019).
  10. Pietruszyńska, K. Prawo pracy – informator dla kobiet w ciąży. Warszawa: Państwowa Inspekcja Pracy, 2018. https://www.pip.gov.pl/pl/f/v/190121/PrawoPracy-InforKobCiaza-wyd3-Intern.pdf (14th January 2019).
  11. Bundesministeriums der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. Gesetz zum Schutz von Müttern bei der Arbeit, in der Ausbildung und im Studium (Mutterschutzgesetz - MuSchG). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/muschg_2018/BJNR122810017.html#BJNR122810017BJNG000200000 (14th January 2019).
  12. Toth B, Strowitzki T, Wallwiener M, et al. Heidelberger Schwangerschafts- & Elternzeitprogramm (HeiSEP). https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/Heidelberger-Schwangerschafts-Elternzeitprogramm-HeiSEP.129792.0.html (14th January 2019).
  13. Donaldson J. Infection Control Today - Operating Room - Hazardous Materials Emergencies in Surgery. http://beta.infectioncontroltoday.com/infections/infection-control-today-operating-room-hazardous-materials-emergencies-surgery (14th January 2019).
  14. Heinonen S, Saarikoski S. Reproductive risk factors, pregnancy characteristics and obstetric outcome in female doctors. BJOG. 2002; 109(3): 261–264.
  15. Lynch L, Spivak ES. The pregnant healthcare worker: fact and fiction. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015; 28(4): 362–368.
  16. Nienhaus A, Kesavachandran C, Wendeler D, et al. Infectious diseases in healthcare workers - an analysis of the standardised data set of a German compensation board. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2012; 7(1): 8.
  17. Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny. Czynniki biologiczne występujące w miejscu pracy. https://gis.gov.pl/zdrowie/szkodliwe-czynniki-biologiczne-wystepujace-w-miejscu-prac/ (14th January 2019).
  18. Dutkiewicz J, Cisak E, Sroka J, et al. Biological agents as occupational hazards - selected issues. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 286–293.
  19. Wicker S, Rabenau HF, Haberl AE, et al. Blood-borne infections and the pregnant health care worker. Risks and preventive measures. Chirurg. 2002; 83(2): 136–142.
  20. Győrffy Z, Dweik D, Girasek E. Reproductive health and burn-out among female physicians: nationwide, representative study from Hungary. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14: 121.
  21. Sheiner E, Sheiner EK, Potashnik G, et al. The relationship between occupational psychological stress and female fertility. Occup Med (Lond). 2003; 53(4): 265–269.
  22. Waters TR, Dick RB. Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness. Rehabil Nurs. 2015; 40(3): 148–165.
  23. Kramer MS, McDonald SW. Aerobic exercise for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3): CD000180.
  24. Gaudineau A. [Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality of intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational age]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013; 42(8): 895–910.
  25. Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88(1): 31–38.
  26. Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Pięta B, Buks J, et al. Determinants of favourable neonatal outcome after premature rupture of membranes (PROM) before 24 weeks of pregnancy--review of the literature and a case report. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(3): 577–580.
  27. Downes J, Rauk PN, Vanheest AE. Occupational hazards for pregnant or lactating women in the orthopaedic operating room. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(5): 326–332.
  28. Behbehani S, Tulandi T. Obstetrical Complications in Pregnant Medical and Surgical Residents. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2015; 37(1): 25–31.
  29. Zhang J, Cai WW, Lee D. Occupational hazards and pregnancy outcomes. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1992; 21(3): 397–408.
  30. Zadeh HG, Briggs TW. Ionising radiation: are orthopaedic surgeons’ offspring at risk? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997; 79(3): 214–220.
  31. Bolyard E, Tablan O, Williams W, et al. Guideline for infection control in health care personnel, 1998. American Journal of Infection Control. 1998; 26(3): 289–327.
  32. Dzau VJ, Kirch DG, Nasca TJ. To Care Is Human - Collectively Confronting the Clinician-Burnout Crisis. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(4): 312–314.
  33. Roberts DL, Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, et al. A national comparison of burnout and work-life balance among internal medicine hospitalists and outpatient general internists. J Hosp Med. 2014; 9(3): 176–181.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl