open access

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)
Research paper
Published online: 2019-08-30
Get Citation

Evaluation of occult uterine leiomyosarcomas

Emrah Beyan1, Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz1, Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan2, Volkan Karataşlı1, Sadettin Oğuzhan Tutar3, Murat Alan1, Emrah Töz1, Muzaffer Sancı1
·
Pubmed: 31482545
·
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(8):433-437.
Affiliations
  1. Health Sciences University, Tepecik Education and Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, İzmir, Turkey
  2. Ministry of Health Izmir Provincial Health Directorate Bornova Türkan Özilhan State Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye
  3. Ministry of Health Ardahan Provincial Health Directorate Ardahan State Hospital, Turkey

open access

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2019-08-30

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the frequency of occult uterine leiomyosarcomas following hysterectomies and myomectomies performed for benign reasons at our clinic and to draw comparisons with similar studies in the literature. 

Material and methods: All hysterectomies and myomectomies that have been performed for benign reasons at our clinic between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively examined via the hospital’s information system and the patients that were found to have leiomyosarcomas were analysed. The incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma per 1000 surgeries at our clinic was calculated using the Wilson score interval. 

Results: A total of 6,173 hysterectomies were performed, and occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was identified in 5 patients. The incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was calculated to be 0.08% (95% CI 0.03–0.018%). Only 1 of the 771 patients who underwent myomectomy was identified with occult uterine leiomyosarcoma, making its incidence in myomectomy 0.12% (95% CI 0.02–0.073%). When all the patients are considered, occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was identified in 6 of the 6,944 patients, and the general incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was calculated as 0.08% (95% CI 0.03–0.018%). 

Conclusions: In our study, the incidence of occult uterine sarcoma following myomectomy and hysterectomy was found to be lower than that reported in the literature. The reason for this lower incidence includes not only genetic causes and racial differences but also preoperative imaging, endometrial and cervical sampling that is performed on every patient.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the frequency of occult uterine leiomyosarcomas following hysterectomies and myomectomies performed for benign reasons at our clinic and to draw comparisons with similar studies in the literature. 

Material and methods: All hysterectomies and myomectomies that have been performed for benign reasons at our clinic between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively examined via the hospital’s information system and the patients that were found to have leiomyosarcomas were analysed. The incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma per 1000 surgeries at our clinic was calculated using the Wilson score interval. 

Results: A total of 6,173 hysterectomies were performed, and occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was identified in 5 patients. The incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was calculated to be 0.08% (95% CI 0.03–0.018%). Only 1 of the 771 patients who underwent myomectomy was identified with occult uterine leiomyosarcoma, making its incidence in myomectomy 0.12% (95% CI 0.02–0.073%). When all the patients are considered, occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was identified in 6 of the 6,944 patients, and the general incidence of occult uterine leiomyosarcoma was calculated as 0.08% (95% CI 0.03–0.018%). 

Conclusions: In our study, the incidence of occult uterine sarcoma following myomectomy and hysterectomy was found to be lower than that reported in the literature. The reason for this lower incidence includes not only genetic causes and racial differences but also preoperative imaging, endometrial and cervical sampling that is performed on every patient.

Get Citation

Keywords

leiomyosarcoma; hysterectomy; myomectomy; myoma

About this article
Title

Evaluation of occult uterine leiomyosarcomas

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 90, No 8 (2019)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

433-437

Published online

2019-08-30

Page views

1112

Article views/downloads

1072

DOI

10.5603/GP.2019.0075

Pubmed

31482545

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2019;90(8):433-437.

Keywords

leiomyosarcoma
hysterectomy
myomectomy
myoma

Authors

Emrah Beyan
Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz
Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan
Volkan Karataşlı
Sadettin Oğuzhan Tutar
Murat Alan
Emrah Töz
Muzaffer Sancı

References (33)
  1. Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(7): 2253–2257.
  2. Yuk JS, Kim LY, Kim SH, et al. The Incidence of Unexpected Uterine Malignancy in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for a Benign Condition: A National Population-Based Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(12): 4029–4034.
  3. Alper M. Turkish Ministry of Health. Statistical report of State hospitals 2017. 2018. p. 78. https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/21853,kamu-hastaneleri-istatistik-raporu--2017pdf.pdf?0.
  4. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(6): e155–e159.
  5. Desai VB, Wright JD, Schwartz PE, et al. Occult Gynecologic Cancer in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy or Myomectomy for Benign Indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131(4): 642–651.
  6. Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, et al. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1993; 71(4 Suppl): 1702–1709.
  7. D'Angelo E, Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 116(1): 131–139.
  8. Francis M, Dennis NL, Hirschowitz L, et al. Incidence and survival of gynecologic sarcomas in England. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015; 25(5): 850–857.
  9. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL practice report: Morcellation during uterine tissue extraction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21(4): 517–530.
  10. Lange S, Pluchino N, Fehlmann A, et al. Prevalence of undiagnosed uterine leiomyosarcoma in women undergoing hysterectomy or myomectomy for benign indications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 216: 239–244.
  11. Fang Z, Matsumoto S, Ae K, et al. Postradiation soft tissue sarcoma: a multiinstitutional analysis of 14 cases in Japan. J Orthop Sci. 2004; 9(3): 242–246.
  12. Yildirim Y, Inal MM, Sanci M, et al. Development of uterine sarcoma after tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer: report of four cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005; 15(6): 1239–1242.
  13. Toro JR, Nickerson ML, Wei MH, et al. Mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene cause hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer in families in North America. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 73(1): 95–106.
  14. Wood LN, Jamnagerwalla J, Markowitz MA, et al. Public Awareness of Uterine Power Morcellation Through US Food and Drug Administration Communications: Analysis of Google Trends Search Term Patterns. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018; 4(2): e47.
  15. Hechanova ML, Lin K, Richardson DL, et al. Risk of Occult Uterine Sarcoma in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127(3): 468–473.
  16. Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS YR. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. In: 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2014. http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?codlan=1&codcol=70&codcch=4006.
  17. US Food and Drug Administration. Quantitative assessment of the prevalence of unsuspected uterine sarcoma in women undergoing treatment of uterine fibroids: summary and key findings. 2014. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/UCM393589.pdf.
  18. Sinha R, Hegde A, Mahajan C, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: do size, number, and location of the myomas form limiting factors for laparoscopic myomectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15(3): 292–300.
  19. Brohl AS, Li Li, Andikyan V, et al. Age-stratified risk of unexpected uterine sarcoma following surgery for presumed benign leiomyoma. Oncologist. 2015; 20(4): 433–439.
  20. Kundu S, Zachen M, Hertel H, et al. Sarcoma Risk in Uterine Surgery in a Tertiary University Hospital in Germany. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27(5): 961–966.
  21. DiNapoli MN, Truong MD, Halfon JK, et al. Unsuspected Uterine Sarcoma in an Urban Hospital: Does Surgical Approach Matter? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(3): 491–497.
  22. Gultekin M, Kucukyildiz I, Karaca MZ, et al. Trends of Gynecological Cancers in Turkey: Toward Europe or Asia? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017; 27(7): 1525–1533.
  23. Tropé CG, Abeler VM, Kristensen GB. Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review. Acta Oncol. 2012; 51(6): 694–705.
  24. Han SC, Kim MD, Jung DC, et al. Degeneration of leiomyoma in patients referred for uterine fibroid embolization: incidence, imaging features and clinical characteristics. Yonsei Med J. 2013; 54(1): 215–219.
  25. Bharambe BM, Deshpande KA, Surase SG, et al. Malignant transformation of leiomyoma of uterus to leiomyosarcoma with metastasis to ovary. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014; 64(1): 68–69.
  26. Parker WH, Fu YS, Berek JS. Uterine sarcoma in patients operated on for presumed leiomyoma and rapidly growing leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83(3): 414–418.
  27. Seidman MA, Oduyebo T, Muto MG, et al. Peritoneal dissemination complicating morcellation of uterine mesenchymal neoplasms. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11): e50058.
  28. Multinu F, Casarin J, Tortorella L, et al. Incidence of sarcoma in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220(2): 179.e1–179.e10.
  29. Leung F, Terzibachian J-J, Aouar Z, et al. [Uterine sarcomas: clinical and histopathological aspects. Report on 15 cases]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008; 36(6): 628–635.
  30. Ramm O, Gleason JL, Segal S, et al. Utility of preoperative endometrial assessment in asymptomatic women undergoing hysterectomy for pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23(7): 913–917.
  31. Theben JU, Schellong ARM, Altgassen C, et al. Unexpected malignancies after laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomies (LASH): an analysis of 1,584 LASH cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 287(3): 455–462.
  32. Wright JD, Tergas AI, Burke WM, et al. Uterine pathology in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy using morcellation. JAMA. 2014; 312(12): 1253–1255.
  33. Wan OYK, Cheung RYK, Chan SSC, et al. Risk of malignancy in women who underwent hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 53(2): 190–196.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl