open access

Vol 90, No 4 (2019)
Research paper
Published online: 2019-04-29
Get Citation

Predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Samettin Çelik1, Canan S. Çalışkan1, Handan Çelik2, Mehmet Güçlü3, Alper Başbuğ4
·
Pubmed: 31059115
·
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(4):217-222.
Affiliations
  1. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsun Research and Education Hospital, Turkey
  2. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey
  3. Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey
  4. Düzce University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey

open access

Vol 90, No 4 (2019)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Obstetrics
Published online: 2019-04-29

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate in our clinic the perinatal outcomes of patients diagnosed with ICP based on pre-treatment maternal serum bile acid levels, attempt to identify the risk group and review the literature in light of this information. 

Material and methods: In total, 370 patients diagnosed with ICP were included in the study, divided into two groups based on the fasting total serum bile acid level before UDCA (Group 1: 10 ≥ 40 μmol/L, and Group 2: ≥ 40 μmol/L). The groups were examined for clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. 

Results: It was found that preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care need increased at a serum bile acid cut-off value of 34 μmol/L. Regardless of serum bile acid, significantly higher rates of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and foetal distress were observed in patients whose diagnoses were made before 34 weeks of gestation. 

Conclusions: Foetal complications over 40 μmol/L of serum bile acid were significantly increased. However, slightly lower levels cut-off values (34 μmol/L) were obtained in terms of preterm birth and neonatal intensive care need. The incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and foetal distress was higher in patients whose diagnosis were made before 34 weeks of gestation. 

Abstract

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate in our clinic the perinatal outcomes of patients diagnosed with ICP based on pre-treatment maternal serum bile acid levels, attempt to identify the risk group and review the literature in light of this information. 

Material and methods: In total, 370 patients diagnosed with ICP were included in the study, divided into two groups based on the fasting total serum bile acid level before UDCA (Group 1: 10 ≥ 40 μmol/L, and Group 2: ≥ 40 μmol/L). The groups were examined for clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. 

Results: It was found that preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care need increased at a serum bile acid cut-off value of 34 μmol/L. Regardless of serum bile acid, significantly higher rates of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and foetal distress were observed in patients whose diagnoses were made before 34 weeks of gestation. 

Conclusions: Foetal complications over 40 μmol/L of serum bile acid were significantly increased. However, slightly lower levels cut-off values (34 μmol/L) were obtained in terms of preterm birth and neonatal intensive care need. The incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and foetal distress was higher in patients whose diagnosis were made before 34 weeks of gestation. 

Get Citation

Keywords

intrahepatic cholestasis; pregnancy; perinatal complications

Supp./Additional Files (1)
Untitled
Download
14KB
About this article
Title

Predictors of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 90, No 4 (2019)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

217-222

Published online

2019-04-29

Page views

2415

Article views/downloads

1893

DOI

10.5603/GP.2019.0039

Pubmed

31059115

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2019;90(4):217-222.

Keywords

intrahepatic cholestasis
pregnancy
perinatal complications

Authors

Samettin Çelik
Canan S. Çalışkan
Handan Çelik
Mehmet Güçlü
Alper Başbuğ

References (20)
  1. Williamson C, Geenes V. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124(1): 120–133.
  2. Herrera CA, Manuck TA, Stoddard GJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31(14): 1913–1920.
  3. Perez MJ, Macias RIR, Marin JJG. Maternal cholestasis induces placental oxidative stress and apoptosis. Protective effect of ursodeoxycholic acid. Placenta. 2006; 27(1): 34–41.
  4. Geenes VL, Lim YH, Bowman N, et al. A placental phenotype for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2011; 32(12): 1026–1032.
  5. Glantz A, Marschall HU, Mattsson LA. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates. Hepatology. 2004; 40(2): 467–474.
  6. Geenes V, Chappell LC, Seed PT, et al. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology. 2014; 59(4): 1482–1491.
  7. Geenes V, Williamson C. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009; 15(17): 2049.
  8. Estiú MC, Frailuna MA, Otero C, et al. Relationship between early onset severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and higher risk of meconium-stained fluid. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4): e0176504.
  9. Wikström Shemer E, Marschall HU, Ludvigsson JF, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a 12-year population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2013; 120(6): 717–723.
  10. Martineau M, Raker C, Powrie R, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of gestational diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 176: 80–85.
  11. Madazli R, Yuksel MA, Oncul M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 35(4): 358–361.
  12. Cui D, Zhong Y, Zhang L, et al. Bile acid levels and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017; 43(9): 1411–1420.
  13. Kawakita T, Parikh LI, Ramsey PS, et al. Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213(4): 570.e1–570.e8.
  14. Oztas E, Erkenekli K, Ozler S, et al. Can routine laboratory parameters predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy? J Perinat Med. 2015; 43(6): 667–674.
  15. Rook M, Vargas J, Caughey A, et al. Fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a Northern California cohort. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3): e28343.
  16. Campos GA, Castillo RJ, Toro FG. [Effect of bile acids on the myometral contractility of the isolated pregnant uterus]. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1988; 53(4): 229–233.
  17. Germain AM, Kato S, Carvajal JA, et al. Bile acids increase response and expression of human myometrial oxytocin receptor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(2): 577–582.
  18. WILLIAMSON C, GORELIK J, EATON B, et al. The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis. Clinical Science. 2001; 100(4): 363–369.
  19. Williamson C, Gorelik J, Eaton BM, et al. The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2001; 100(4): 363–369.
  20. Miragoli M, Kadir SH, Sheppard MN, et al. A protective antiarrhythmic role of ursodeoxycholic acid in an in vitro rat model of the cholestatic fetal heart. Hepatology. 2011; 54(4): 1282–1292.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl