Vol 90, No 3 (2019)
Research paper
Published online: 2019-03-29

open access

Page views 2778
Article views/downloads 1670
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Long-term outcomes of prenatally diagnosed ventriculomegaly — 10 years of Polish tertiary centre experience

Michal Lipa1, Przemyslaw Kosinski1, Kamila Wojcieszak1, Aleksandra Wesolowska-Tomczyk1, Adrianna Szyjka1, Martyna Rozek1, Miroslaw Wielgos1
Pubmed: 30950004
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(3):148-153.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence, associated anomalies, and postnatal outcomes in infants prenatally diagnosed with ventriculomegaly. 

Material and methods: All cases of ventriculomegaly that were examined and treated by the 1st Department of Obstet- rics and Gynecology, at the Medical University of Warsaw, from August 2007 until November 2017 were included in this study. Ultrasound data, and information on perinatal outcomes and long-term postnatal follow up were retrospectively collected by a standardised telephone survey. Ventriculomegaly was diagnosed when the atrial width of the lateral ventri- cles was ≥ 10 mm. The cases analyzed were divided into two subgroups: isolated ventriculomegaly (IVM) and non-isolated ventriculomegaly (NIVM). Neurodevelopmental complications were differentiated as either moderate or severe and were compared within each group and between groups. 

Results: There were 118 cases of prenatally diagnosed ventriculomegaly. Complete follow up records were collected for 54 cases (45.8%). IVM was diagnosed in 29/54 (53.7%) cases, while NIVM was diagnosed in the remaining 25 (46.3%). The mean ventricular width for IVM was 16.93 mm (range 10.0 mm–73.0 mm) and 14.08 mm (range 9.0 mm–27.1 mm) for NIVM (p = 0.28). The mean gestational age at delivery for the IVM cases was 36 + 4 weeks and in the NIVM group 33 + 4 weeks (p = 0.022). Mild VM (10–12 mm) was diagnosed in 22/54 cases (40.7%), moderate VM (13–15 mm) in 12/54 (22.3%) and severe (≥ 15 mm) in 20/54 (37%). Among the infants with IVM the rate of severe medical complications was 29.6% (8/28) and for NIVM 667% (8/12) (p = 0.041). Less severe medical conditions affected 6/28 of the infants with IVM (21.4%) vs 9/12 NIVM cases (75%) (p = 0.012). 

Conclusions: In terms of prenatal diagnosis, treatment of ventriculomegaly remains challenging due to a lack of specific prognostic factors and the significant risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. Nevertheless, isolated ventriculomegaly has significantly better long-term outcomes compared with non-isolated ventriculomegaly. In our material, the rate of severe neurodevelopmental disorders in the non-isolated ventriculomegaly cases was associated with a 52% rate of adverse perinatal outcomes. On the other hand, less severe medical conditions occurred in 21.4% of the infants with IVM and in 75% of the NIVM cases. Furthermore, obstetrical data suggest that the risks of premature delivery and caesarean section are significantly higher in cases of non-isolated ventriculomegaly. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Chu N, Zhang Y, Yan Y, et al. Fetal ventriculomegaly: Pregnancy outcomes and follow-ups in ten years. Biosci Trends. 2016; 10(2): 125–132.
  2. Kramer RL, Yaron Y, Johnson MP, et al. Differences in measurements of the atria of the lateral ventricle: does gender matter? Fetal Diagn Ther. 1997; 12(5): 304–305.
  3. Gómez-Arriaga P, Herraiz I, Puente JM, et al. Mid-term neurodevelopmental outcome in isolated mild ventriculomegaly diagnosed in fetal life. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012; 31(1): 12–18.
  4. Hannon T, Tennant PWG, Rankin J, et al. Epidemiology, natural history, progression, and postnatal outcome of severe fetal ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(6): 1345–1353.
  5. Pisapia JM, Sinha S, Zarnow DM, et al. Fetal ventriculomegaly: Diagnosis, treatment, and future directions. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017; 33(7): 1113–1123.
  6. Signorelli M, Tiberti A, Valseriati D, et al. Width of the fetal lateral ventricular atrium between 10 and 12 mm: a simple variation of the norm? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23(1): 14–18.
  7. Melchiorre K, Bhide A, Gika AD, et al. Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(2): 212–224.
  8. Ouahba J, Luton D, Vuillard E, et al. Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly: outcome in 167 cases. BJOG. 2006; 113(9): 1072–1079.
  9. Breeze ACG, Dey PK, Lees CC, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in apparently isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. J Perinat Med. 2005; 33(3): 236–240.
  10. Pilu G, Falco P, Gabrielli S, et al. The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly: report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 14(5): 320–326.
  11. Gaglioti P, Danelon D, Bontempo S, et al. Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: outcome in 176 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25(4): 372–377.
  12. Weichert J, Hartge D, Krapp M, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly in 29,000 pregnancies followed at a single institution. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27(3): 142–148.
  13. Carta S, Kaelin Agten A, Belcaro C, et al. Outcome of fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of isolated severe bilateral ventriculomegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52(2): 165–173.
  14. Pagani G, Thilaganathan B, Prefumo F. Neurodevelopmental outcome in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44(3): 254–260.
  15. Prayer D, Paladini D, Deprest J. Should MRI be performed on all fetuses with mild ventriculomegaly ? Prenat Diagn. 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
  16. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the 'basic examination' and the 'fetal neurosonogram'. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29(1): 109–116.
  17. Malinger G, Paladini D, Pilu G, et al. Fetal cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, neurosonography and the brave new world of fetal medicine. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50(6): 679–680.
  18. Salomon LJ, Ouahba J, Delezoide AL, et al. Third-trimester fetal MRI in isolated 10- to 12-mm ventriculomegaly: is it worth it? BJOG. 2006; 113(8): 942–947.
  19. Senat MV, Bernard JP, Schwärzler P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of 14 cases of unilateral ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 14(5): 327–332.
  20. Vergani P, Locatelli A, Strobelt N, et al. Clinical outcome of mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178(2): 218–222.
  21. Bromley B, Frigoletto F, Benacerraf B. Mild fetal lateral cerebral ventriculomegaly: Clinical course and outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1991; 164(3): 863–867.
  22. Pilu G, Hobbins JC. Sonography of fetal cerebrospinal anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2002; 22(4): 321–330.
  23. Guibaud L. Fetal cerebral ventricular measurement and ventriculomegaly: time for procedure standardization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34(2): 127–130.