open access

Vol 87, No 7 (2016)
Review paper
Published online: 2016-07-29
Get Citation

Current methods for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Joanna Liss, Iwona Chromik, Joanna Szczyglińska, Monika Jagiełło, Aron Łukaszuk, Krzysztof Łukaszuk
·
Pubmed: 27504946
·
Ginekol Pol 2016;87(7):522-526.

open access

Vol 87, No 7 (2016)
REVIEW PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2016-07-29

Abstract

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) used in assisted reproduction techniques is designed to provide help for couples trying to conceive a child, as it helps deliver healthy offspring. After in vitro fertilization, material is collected from the oocyte (polar body), 3-day-old embryo, or increasingly often, from the trophectoderm of a blastocyst. Selection of the diagnostic method depends on the testing center, but methods such as aCGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array) and NGS (Next-Generation Sequencing) are supposed to have the highest reliability and precision. This paper presents a review of the most important methods used in PGD, their advantages and disadvantages as well as efficacy in the procedures in which they are used.

Abstract

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) used in assisted reproduction techniques is designed to provide help for couples trying to conceive a child, as it helps deliver healthy offspring. After in vitro fertilization, material is collected from the oocyte (polar body), 3-day-old embryo, or increasingly often, from the trophectoderm of a blastocyst. Selection of the diagnostic method depends on the testing center, but methods such as aCGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array) and NGS (Next-Generation Sequencing) are supposed to have the highest reliability and precision. This paper presents a review of the most important methods used in PGD, their advantages and disadvantages as well as efficacy in the procedures in which they are used.

Get Citation

Keywords

PGD, PGS, embryo biopsy, next generation sequencing, in vitro fertilization

About this article
Title

Current methods for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 87, No 7 (2016)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

522-526

Published online

2016-07-29

Page views

4797

Article views/downloads

10592

DOI

10.5603/GP.2016.0037

Pubmed

27504946

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2016;87(7):522-526.

Keywords

PGD
PGS
embryo biopsy
next generation sequencing
in vitro fertilization

Authors

Joanna Liss
Iwona Chromik
Joanna Szczyglińska
Monika Jagiełło
Aron Łukaszuk
Krzysztof Łukaszuk

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl