Online first
Research paper
Published online: 2024-10-15

open access

Page views 184
Article views/downloads 124
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Values of ultrasound elastography and progesterone receptor proteins for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid

Jia Zhao1, Yuanyuan Li1, Lingxue Cui1

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to study the values of ultrasound elastography (UE) and progesterone receptor (PR) proteins for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of uterine fibroid (UF).

Material and methods: A total of 200 UF patients treated from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected as a UF group, and another 100 healthy women as a healthy group. Routine ultrasound parameters uterine artery pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), and UE parameter strain ratio (SR) were obtained. The relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the peripheral blood were detected by Western blotting. The differences in these parameters and relative protein expressions of PRA and PRB were compared. The UF patients were divided into a cure group (n = 159) and a recurrence group (n = 41) according to their prognosis.

Results: The protein expressions of PRA and PRB in the UF group were higher than those in the healthy group (p < 0.05). In the recurrence group, PI and RI were lower, while SR and the protein expressions of PRA and PRB were higher than those in the cure group (p < 0.05). Age at menarche < 13 years old, intramural fibroid, PI, RI, SR, PRA, and PRB were risk factors for recurrence in UF patients (p < 0.05). The efficiency of combination of ultrasound and UE parameters, PRA and PRB for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF was significantly higher than that of any single indicator ( p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Ultrasound and UE parameters combined with PR proteins have high efficiency for the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of UF.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Mathew RP, Francis S, Jayaram V, et al. Uterine leiomyomas revisited with review of literature. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021; 46(10): 4908–4926.
  2. Mlodawska OW, Saini P, Parker JB, et al. Epigenomic and enhancer dysregulation in uterine leiomyomas. Hum Reprod Update. 2022; 28(4): 518–547.
  3. Yang Q, Ciebiera M, Bariani MV, et al. Comprehensive Review of Uterine Fibroids: Developmental Origin, Pathogenesis, and Treatment. Endocr Rev. 2022; 43(4): 678–719.
  4. Ciarmela P, Delli Carpini G, Greco S, et al. Uterine fibroid vascularization: from morphological evidence to clinical implications. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022; 44(2): 281–294.
  5. Zhang M, Wasnik A, Masch W, et al. Transvaginal Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for the Evaluation of Benign Uterine Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2018; 38(1): 149–155.
  6. Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Omori M, et al. MR-guided Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Preliminary Study of Relationship between the Treatment Outcomes and Factors of MR Images Including Elastography. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2019; 18(1): 82–87.
  7. Wang XL, Lin S, Lyu GR. Advances in the clinical application of ultrasound elastography in uterine imaging. Insights Imaging. 2022; 13(1): 141.
  8. Ali M, Ciebiera M, Vafaei S, et al. Progesterone Signaling and Uterine Fibroid Pathogenesis; Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutics. Cells. 2023; 12(8).
  9. Cloud AS, Koohestani F, McWilliams MM, et al. Loss of the repressor REST affects progesterone receptor function and promotes uterine leiomyoma pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(44): e2205524119.
  10. Szucio W, Bernaczyk P, Ponikwicka-Tyszko D, et al. Progesterone signaling in uterine leiomyoma biology: Implications for potential targeted therapy. Adv Med Sci. 2024; 69(1): 21–28.
  11. Tanioka S, Asano R, Wakabayashi R, et al. Possible significance of degeneration and decreased expression of progesterone receptor in postmenopausal uterine leiomyoma. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1): 346.
  12. Guo J, Bai T, Ding Z, et al. Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Versus Gastrointestinal Leiomyoma. Medical Science Monitor. 2020; 27.
  13. Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P, et al. et al.. A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022; 16(1): 49-54. doi: 10.22074/IJFS.2021.523075. 1074, indexed in Pubmed. ; 35103432.
  14. Giambini H, An KN. Ultrasound Elastography for Hand Soft Tissue Assessment. Hand Clin. 2022; 38(1): 119–128.
  15. Shao J, Shi G, Qi Z, et al. Advancements in the Application of Ultrasound Elastography in the Cervix. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021; 47(8): 2048–2063.
  16. Li H, Bhatt M, Qu Z, et al. Deep learning in ultrasound elastography imaging: A review. Med Phys. 2022; 49(9): 5993–6018.
  17. Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P, et al. A Comparison of Shear Wave Elastography between Normal Myometrium, Uterine Fibroids, and Adenomyosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022; 16(1): 49–54.
  18. Ota K, Sato K, Shiraishi S, et al. Ageing impairs restoration of endometrial blood flow impedance after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile women with uterine fibroids. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 42(5): 1211–1216.
  19. Nagy A, Sathe S, Atta A, et al. Characterization of Nuclear Progesterone Receptor Isoforms in the Term Equine Placenta. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021; 8.
  20. Liu S, Yin P, Xu J, et al. Progesterone receptor-DNA methylation crosstalk regulates depletion of uterine leiomyoma stem cells: A potential therapeutic target. Stem Cell Reports. 2021; 16(9): 2099–2106.
  21. Szydłowska I, Grabowska M, Nawrocka-Rutkowska J, et al. Markers of Cellular Proliferation, Apoptosis, Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor Expression and Fibrosis in Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator (Ulipristal Acetate)-Treated Uterine Fibroids. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(4).
  22. Zhang L, Feng Q, Wang Z, et al. Progesterone receptor antagonist provides palliative effects for uterine leiomyoma through a Bcl-2/Beclin1-dependent mechanism. Biosci Rep. 2019; 39(7).
  23. Cordeiro Mitchell CN, Islam MdS, Afrin S, et al. Mechanical stiffness augments ligand-dependent progesterone receptor B activation via MEK 1/2 and Rho/ROCK-dependent signaling pathways in uterine fibroid cells. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(1): 255–265.
  24. Tanioka S, Asano R, Wakabayashi R, et al. Possible significance of degeneration and decreased expression of progesterone receptor in postmenopausal uterine leiomyoma. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1): 346.
  25. Dolmans MM, Donnez J, Fellah L. Uterine fibroid management: Today and tomorrow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019; 45(7): 1222–1229.