Online first
Research paper
Published online: 2024-08-19

open access

Page views 244
Article views/downloads 116
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Prevalence of urinary incontinence and prolapse after hysterectomy for benign disease versus gynecologic malignancy

Jeannine M. Miranne1, Iwona Gabriel2, Maura Kelly1, Alexa Courtepatte1, Vatche A. Minassian1

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy for benign disease and gynecologic malignancy. This is a retrospective cohort chart review study. Two major urban tertiary care centers between 2006–2010. Women ≥ 18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications.

Material and methods: Presence of UI and POP was based on patient report in clinic notes, ICD-9 UI and POP diagnosis codes, and CPT codes for treatment. Prevalence of UI and POP after hysterectomy and time to development of UI and POP after hysterectomy.

Results: 1363 (55%) women underwent hysterectomy for benign disease while 1107 (45%) had a hysterectomy for malignancy. Postoperative prevalence of UI and POP in the benign versus the malignant group was 15.1% vs 11.1% (p = 0.001), and 12.1% vs 2.8%, (p < 0.001), respectively. The median time to development of UI in the subset of patients without preoperative UI was 3.5 years in the benign group vs 3 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). The median time to development of POP in the subset of patients without preoperative POP was 5 years in the benign group and 3.5 years in the malignant group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of developing UI or POP between groups after adjusting for confounders or when accounting for pre-hysterectomy UI or POP.

Conclusions: When pre-hysterectomy UI or POP is taken into consideration, there is no difference in the prevalence of post-hysterectomy UI or POP.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(1): 141–148.
  2. Andersen LL, Møller LM, Gimbel H, et al. Danish Hysterectomy Trial Group. Lower urinary tract symptoms after subtotal versus total abdominal hysterectomy: exploratory analyses from a randomized clinical trial with a 14-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26(12): 1767–1772.
  3. Lakeman MME, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP, et al. HysVA study group. Hysterectomy and lower urinary tract symptoms: a nonrandomized comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010; 70(2): 100–106.
  4. Farquhar CM, Sadler L, Stewart AW. A prospective study of outcomes five years after hysterectomy in premenopausal women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 48(5): 510–516.
  5. Persson P, Brynhildsen J, Kjølhede P, et al. Hysterectomy Multicentre Study Group in South-East Sweden. Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long-term follow-up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG. 2013; 120(12): 1556–1565.
  6. Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(5): 572.e1–572.e6.
  7. Gabriel I, Kalousdian A, Brito LG, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse after 3 modes of hysterectomy: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224(5): 496.e1–496.e10.
  8. Selcuk S, Cam C, Asoglu MR, et al. Effect of simple and radical hysterectomy on quality of life - analysis of all aspects of pelvic floor dysfunction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 198: 84–88.
  9. Cibula D, Velechovska P, Sláma J, et al. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 116(3): 506–511.
  10. Laterza RM, Salvatore S, Ghezzi F, et al. Urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 194: 11–16.
  11. Thomas SG, Sato HRN, Glantz JC, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders among gynecologic oncology patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(5): 976–980.
  12. Ramaseshan AS, Felton J, Roque D, et al. Pelvic floor disorders in women with gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29(4): 459–476.
  13. Wojcik M, Jarzabek-Bielecka G, Merks P, et al. The role of visceral therapy, Kegel's muscle, core stability and diet in pelvic support disorders and urinary incontinence - including sexological aspects and the role of physiotherapy and osteopathy. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(12): 1018–1027.
  14. Christiansen UJ, Hansen MJ, Lauszus FF. Hysterectomy is not associated with de-novo urinary incontinence: A ten-year cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 215: 175–179.
  15. Bohlin KS, Ankardal M, Lindkvist H, et al. Factors influencing the incidence and remission of urinary incontinence after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216(1): 53.e1–53.e9.
  16. Wang S, Wang R, Wen H, et al. Association of pelvic floor function with postoperative urinary incontinence in cervical cancer patients after the radical hysterectomy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021; 40(1): 483–492.
  17. Nakayama N, Tsuji T, Aoyama M, et al. Quality of life and the prevalence of urinary incontinence after surgical treatment for gynecologic cancer: a questionnaire survey. BMC Womens Health. 2020; 20(1): 148.
  18. Higgs P, Janda M, Asher R, et al. Pelvic floor functional outcomes after total abdominal vs total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218(4): 419.e1–419.e14.