open access
Comparison of Bishop's score and cervical length in determining the need for cervical maturation before labor induction
, 2, 3, 2, 4
Affiliations- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zonguldak Obstetrics and Gynecology State Hospital, Zonguldak, Türkiye, Türkiye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University School of Medicine, Antalya, Türkiye, Türkiye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye, Türkiye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bayındır Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye, Türkiye
open access
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the evaluation of cervical length measured by the Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography in determining the need for prostaglandin application for cervical ripening in term nulliparous pregnancies. Material and methods: In our study, a total of 120 patients who were admitted to our hospital between February 2015 and August 2015 were divided into two groups as cervical length group and Bishop score group according to hospitalization order by applying the Permuted Block Randomization method, which is one of the Restricted Randomization methods. Each patient included in the study was evaluated with both the Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography. Groups were compared according to the APGAR scores in the 1st and 5th minutes, transition within 12 hours, birthing within 24 hours, birthing with only dinoprostone, birthing with only oxytocin, duration of administration of dinoprostone, duration of oxytocin administration, type of birth, rate of cesarean section, and need for neonatal intensive care. Results: While cervical ripening with dinoprostone was applied to 28 (46.7%) of 60 pregnant women in the Bishop group, labor induction with oxytocin was applied to the remaining 32 (53.3%) pregnant women. In the cervical length group, these values were 33 (55.0%) and 27 (45.0%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between study groups in terms of the need for dinoprostone for cervical ripening (p = 0.361). Of those with a Bishop score of 4 or below, 78.6% (n = 22) had a cervical length of over 28 mm, and 71.4% (n = 20) needed oxytocin. Of those with a Bishop score above 4, none of them had a cervical length greater than 28 mm. A statistically significant difference was found between those with a Bishop score of 4 or below and those above 4 in terms of cervical length (p < 0.05). Among those with a Bishop score of 4 or below, the percentage of those with a cervical length above 28 mm was significantly higher than that of those with a Bishop score above 4. Conclusions: In our study, the delivery time of those with a cervical length of 28 mm and above was significantly higher than those with a cervical length of less than 28 mm, while the bishop score was significantly lower. In order to develop a more objective method that can replace the Bishop scoring system in determining the need for cervical ripening before labor induction, prospective randomized studies that screen larger numbers of patients are needed.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the evaluation of cervical length measured by the Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography in determining the need for prostaglandin application for cervical ripening in term nulliparous pregnancies. Material and methods: In our study, a total of 120 patients who were admitted to our hospital between February 2015 and August 2015 were divided into two groups as cervical length group and Bishop score group according to hospitalization order by applying the Permuted Block Randomization method, which is one of the Restricted Randomization methods. Each patient included in the study was evaluated with both the Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasonography. Groups were compared according to the APGAR scores in the 1st and 5th minutes, transition within 12 hours, birthing within 24 hours, birthing with only dinoprostone, birthing with only oxytocin, duration of administration of dinoprostone, duration of oxytocin administration, type of birth, rate of cesarean section, and need for neonatal intensive care. Results: While cervical ripening with dinoprostone was applied to 28 (46.7%) of 60 pregnant women in the Bishop group, labor induction with oxytocin was applied to the remaining 32 (53.3%) pregnant women. In the cervical length group, these values were 33 (55.0%) and 27 (45.0%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between study groups in terms of the need for dinoprostone for cervical ripening (p = 0.361). Of those with a Bishop score of 4 or below, 78.6% (n = 22) had a cervical length of over 28 mm, and 71.4% (n = 20) needed oxytocin. Of those with a Bishop score above 4, none of them had a cervical length greater than 28 mm. A statistically significant difference was found between those with a Bishop score of 4 or below and those above 4 in terms of cervical length (p < 0.05). Among those with a Bishop score of 4 or below, the percentage of those with a cervical length above 28 mm was significantly higher than that of those with a Bishop score above 4. Conclusions: In our study, the delivery time of those with a cervical length of 28 mm and above was significantly higher than those with a cervical length of less than 28 mm, while the bishop score was significantly lower. In order to develop a more objective method that can replace the Bishop scoring system in determining the need for cervical ripening before labor induction, prospective randomized studies that screen larger numbers of patients are needed.
Keywords
Bishop score; cervical length; labor induction
About this articleTitle
Comparison of Bishop's score and cervical length in determining the need for cervical maturation before labor induction
Journal
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Published online
2023-10-30
Page views
267
Article views/downloads
241
DOI
Pubmed
Keywords
Bishop score
cervical length
labor induction
Authors
Hakan Demir
Emre Köle
Merve Çakır Köle
Ahmet Güllüoğlu
Ahmet Nuri Danışman
References (23)- Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJG, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(4): 690–697.
- Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105(4): 698–704.
- Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180(3 Pt 1): 628–633.
- Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, et al. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005; 17(5): 315–322.
- van Dessel HJ, Frijns JH, Kok FT, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cervical dynamics during the first stage of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994; 53(2): 123–127.
- Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, et al. Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J. 1998; 91(3): 248–252.
- Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, et al. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 23(4): 357–362.
- Iams JD, Landon MB, Teteris JN, et al. Cervical sonography in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 84: 40–46.
- Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79(2): 214–218.
- Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, et al. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(1): 298–303.
- Practice Bulletin No. 127. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012; 119(6): 1308–1317.
- Andersen H. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2005; 19(2): 77–83.
- Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(5): 1181–1193.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5): 1232–1240.
- Park KH, Kim SN, Lee SY, et al. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011; 38(2): 198–204.
- Gouri SJT, Varalakshmi B. Role of Bishop score and cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound in induction of labor primigravidae. IOSR-JDMS. 2015; 14: 81.
- Pandis GPA, Ramanathan V, et al. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of succesful induction labor. Ultrasound Obsted Gynecol. 2001; 18: 623.
- Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Edmonds DK, et al. Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991; 40(1): 17–23.
- Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. European Journal of Ultrasound. 1998; 7(3): 183–187.
- Ware V, Raynor D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of succesful labor induction. Am J Obsted Gynecol. 2000; 182: 1030–1032.
- Gomez La, Gimenez JH, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical lenght and the Bishop score in predicting succesful labor induction. Acta Obsted Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 799.
- Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, et al. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013; 39(9): 1391–1396.
- Ramanathan G, Yu C, Osei E, et al. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22(6): 598–603.
