open access

Ahead of Print
Research paper
Published online: 2023-12-12
Get Citation

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. A randomized controlled trial

Yulin Zhang1, Ying Jia1, Xuelin Dai1, Fulan Wang1, Yao Gong1
·
Pubmed: 38099663
Affiliations
  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, China

open access

Ahead of Print
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2023-12-12

Abstract

Objectives: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) have shown the prospection as minimally invasive procedures. Here we aimed to compare ovarian cystectomy assisted by vNOTES and by LESS for ovarian mature cystic teratoma (OMCT).

Material and methods: A total of 81 premenopausal women with OMCT were randomized to undergo ovarian cystectomy assisted by either vNOTES (n = 41) or LESS (n = 40). The main outcome was the operative time. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, abdominal contamination by teratoma contents, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results: There were no intergroup differences in age, body mass index, tumor size, or bilaterality of tumor. The operative time for the vNOTES group was significantly shorter than that for the LESS group (68.41 ± 20.92 min vs 85.05 ± 32.94 min, p = 0.008). The highest VAS pain score 24 hours postoperatively was 1.21 ± 0.48 in the vNOTES group and 2.43 ± 0.57 in the LESS group (p < 0.001). Twenty-four of the 40 patients in the LESS group experienced teratoma rupture intraoperatively, leading to abdominal contamination by the teratoma content, while 5 abdominal contamination was observed in the vNOTES group (p = 0.005. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the other outcomes.

Conclusions: vNOTES assisted ovarian cystectomy has short operative time, fast recovery, no scarring, less pain, and low rate of abdominal contamination. Consequently, vNOTES might be superior to LESS for treating OMCTs.

Abstract

Objectives: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) have shown the prospection as minimally invasive procedures. Here we aimed to compare ovarian cystectomy assisted by vNOTES and by LESS for ovarian mature cystic teratoma (OMCT).

Material and methods: A total of 81 premenopausal women with OMCT were randomized to undergo ovarian cystectomy assisted by either vNOTES (n = 41) or LESS (n = 40). The main outcome was the operative time. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, abdominal contamination by teratoma contents, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results: There were no intergroup differences in age, body mass index, tumor size, or bilaterality of tumor. The operative time for the vNOTES group was significantly shorter than that for the LESS group (68.41 ± 20.92 min vs 85.05 ± 32.94 min, p = 0.008). The highest VAS pain score 24 hours postoperatively was 1.21 ± 0.48 in the vNOTES group and 2.43 ± 0.57 in the LESS group (p < 0.001). Twenty-four of the 40 patients in the LESS group experienced teratoma rupture intraoperatively, leading to abdominal contamination by the teratoma content, while 5 abdominal contamination was observed in the vNOTES group (p = 0.005. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the other outcomes.

Conclusions: vNOTES assisted ovarian cystectomy has short operative time, fast recovery, no scarring, less pain, and low rate of abdominal contamination. Consequently, vNOTES might be superior to LESS for treating OMCTs.

Get Citation

Keywords

laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), ovarian cystectomy, teratoma

About this article
Title

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. A randomized controlled trial

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Ahead of Print

Article type

Research paper

Published online

2023-12-12

Page views

203

Article views/downloads

152

DOI

10.5603/gpl.95422

Pubmed

38099663

Keywords

laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS)
transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)
ovarian cystectomy
teratoma

Authors

Yulin Zhang
Ying Jia
Xuelin Dai
Fulan Wang
Yao Gong

References (22)
  1. Gordon A, Rosenshein N, Parmley T, et al. Benign cystic teratomas in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138(8): 1120–1123.
  2. Talerman A. Germ cell tumours. Ann Pathol. 1985; 5(3): 145–157.
  3. Baekelandt J. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to ovarian cystectomy. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(2): 366.
  4. Michener CM, Lampert E, Yao M, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoendoscopic single-site and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy compared with multiport hysterectomy: real benefits or diminishing returns? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(3): 698–709.e1.
  5. Kim MS, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Comparison between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic surgery in mature cystic teratoma of the ovary. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019; 8(4): 155–159.
  6. Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295(5): 1089–1103.
  7. Gong Y, Zhu F, Dai X, et al. The Small-Port Effect and the Small-Triangle Manipulation in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery: Concept from a Training Model to the Clinic. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019; 29(7): 949–952.
  8. Park SY, Kim KH, Yuk JS, et al. Skin closure methods after single port laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 189: 8–12.
  9. Park JY, Kim DY, Suh DS, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015; 58(4): 294–301.
  10. Ozceltik G, Yeniel AO, Atay AO, et al. Simplified two-step technique for transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(3): 665–666.
  11. Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, et al. Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and patient experience. Endoscopy. 2010; 42(10): 875–878.
  12. Merlier M, Collinet P, Pierache A, et al. Is V-NOTES hysterectomy as safe and feasible as outpatient surgery compared with vaginal hysterectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022; 29(5): 665–672.
  13. Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: A systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020; 43(1): 44–51.
  14. Baekelandt JF, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, et al. Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019; 126(1): 105–113.
  15. Baekelandt J, De Mulder PA, Le Roy I, et al. Adnexectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy: results of a first randomised controlled trial (NOTABLE trial). BJOG. 2021; 128(11): 1782–1791.
  16. Wang CJ, Wu PY, Kuo HH, et al. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(3): 1227–1234.
  17. Zhang C, Duan K, Fang F, et al. Comparison of transvaginal and transumbilical laparoscopic single-site surgery for ovarian cysts. JSLS. 2021; 25(2).
  18. Guan X, Bardawil E, Liu J, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a rescue for total vaginal hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25(7): 1135–1136.
  19. Baekelandt J. Poor man's NOTES: can it be a good approach for adhesiolysis? A first case report with video demonstration. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22(3): 319.
  20. Hizkiyahu R, Yahav L, Yakovi S, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of intraoperative spillage during laparoscopic removal of benign ovarian cysts. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34(9): 3883–3887.
  21. Childress KJ, Santos XM, Perez-Milicua G, et al. Intraoperative rupture of ovarian dermoid cysts in the pediatric and adolescent population: should this change your surgical management? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30(6): 636–640.
  22. Eisenberg N, Volodarsky-Perel A, Brochu I, et al. Short- and long-term complications of intraoperative benign ovarian cyst spillage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(5): 957–970.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl