open access

Ahead of Print
Research paper
Published online: 2023-12-20
Get Citation

A simple gasless single-port laparoscopy suitable for use in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals

Xiaoying Wang1, Yan Li1
Affiliations
  1. The First Department of Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

open access

Ahead of Print
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2023-12-20

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to explore the effectiveness of a modified suspension method combined with gasless single-port laparoscopy (MS-GSPL) for the treatment of benign ovarian tumors. The aim of this approach is to provide a convenient, economical, and minimally invasive method that is suitable for widespread use, even in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic unilateral ovarian cystectomy due to benign ovarian tumors from January 2019 to December 2019.Thirty-six cases were treated with MS-GSPL, and 36 cases were treated with single-port laparoscopy (SPL). The patients’ medical records, perioperative surgical outcomes, postoperative pain scores and complications were reviewed and compared.

Results: There are no significant differences in age, body mass index, previous pelvic surgery, tumor diameter, and tumor pathologic outcomes between MS-GSPL group and SPL group. The median operation times were 50 (Q1~Q3, 44~62.25) min in the MS-GSPL group and 60.5 (Q1~Q3, 57.25~78) min in the SPL group with a significant difference. The median estimated blood loss was 40 (Q1~Q3, 30~50) mL in the MS-GSPL group and 50(Q1~Q3, 30~60) mL in the SPL group with no significant difference. Compared with SPL group, patients in MS-GSPL group had earlier postoperative exhaust times, shorter hospital stays and lower costs, and all these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between operation time and BMI in the MS-GSPL groups.

Conclusions: The patients receiving MS-GSPL treatment have quick postoperative recoveries. MS-GSPL is a novel, safe and economical surgical method that is suitable for extensive clinical development in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to explore the effectiveness of a modified suspension method combined with gasless single-port laparoscopy (MS-GSPL) for the treatment of benign ovarian tumors. The aim of this approach is to provide a convenient, economical, and minimally invasive method that is suitable for widespread use, even in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic unilateral ovarian cystectomy due to benign ovarian tumors from January 2019 to December 2019.Thirty-six cases were treated with MS-GSPL, and 36 cases were treated with single-port laparoscopy (SPL). The patients’ medical records, perioperative surgical outcomes, postoperative pain scores and complications were reviewed and compared.

Results: There are no significant differences in age, body mass index, previous pelvic surgery, tumor diameter, and tumor pathologic outcomes between MS-GSPL group and SPL group. The median operation times were 50 (Q1~Q3, 44~62.25) min in the MS-GSPL group and 60.5 (Q1~Q3, 57.25~78) min in the SPL group with a significant difference. The median estimated blood loss was 40 (Q1~Q3, 30~50) mL in the MS-GSPL group and 50(Q1~Q3, 30~60) mL in the SPL group with no significant difference. Compared with SPL group, patients in MS-GSPL group had earlier postoperative exhaust times, shorter hospital stays and lower costs, and all these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between operation time and BMI in the MS-GSPL groups.

Conclusions: The patients receiving MS-GSPL treatment have quick postoperative recoveries. MS-GSPL is a novel, safe and economical surgical method that is suitable for extensive clinical development in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals.

Get Citation

Keywords

gasless laparoscopy; ovarian tumor; single-port laparoscopy; suspension method; body mass index

About this article
Title

A simple gasless single-port laparoscopy suitable for use in middle- and low-income countries or primary hospitals

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Ahead of Print

Article type

Research paper

Published online

2023-12-20

Page views

82

Article views/downloads

189

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2023.0059

Pubmed

37417381

Keywords

gasless laparoscopy
ovarian tumor
single-port laparoscopy
suspension method
body mass index

Authors

Xiaoying Wang
Yan Li

References (28)
  1. Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update. Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 141(3): 616–623.
  2. Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N, et al. Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy Using a Single Umbilical Puncture Method. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2001; 11(1): 63–65.
  3. Xiao J, Fu K, Duan K, et al. Pregnancy-preserving Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Gynecologic Disease: A Case Series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(7): 1588–1597.
  4. Chen S, Qi X, Chen L, et al. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery for Comprehensive Staging of Early Ovarian Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26(5): 806.
  5. Demirayak G. A different technique in gasless laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 37(5): 622–626.
  6. Wang Y, Yao Y, Dou Y, et al. Chopstick technique used in laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 6882.
  7. Ma J, Yang J, Cheng S, et al. The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Benign Gynecological Diseases. J Invest Surg. 2022; 35(2): 363–370.
  8. Caglià P, Tracia A, Buffone A, et al. Physiopathology and clinical considerations of laparoscopic surgery in the elderly. Int J Surg. 2016; 33 Suppl 1: S97–S9S102.
  9. Li SH, Deng J, Huang FT, et al. Impact of gasless laparoscopy on circulation, respiration, stress response, and other complications in gynecological geriatrics. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7(9): 2877–2882.
  10. Nagai H, Inaba T, Kamiya S, et al. A New Method of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 1991; 1(2): 126.
  11. Ülker K, Hüseyinoğlu Ü, Kılıç N. Management of benign ovarian cysts by a novel, gasless, single-incision laparoscopic technique: keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery (KARS). Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(1): 189–198.
  12. Takeda A, Imoto S, Nakamura H. Gasless laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 180: 28–34.
  13. Wang X, Li Y. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in removing giant ovarian cysts larger than 15 cm. BMC Surg. 2021; 21(1): 205.
  14. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403): 157–163.
  15. David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, et al. Collegiale d'Obstétrique et Gynécologie de Paris-Ile de France. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(1): 260–265.
  16. Mishra A, Bains L, Jesudin G, et al. Evaluation of Gasless Laparoscopy as a Tool for Minimal Access Surgery in Low-to Middle-Income Countries: A Phase II Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231(5): 511–519.
  17. Pellegrino A, Damiani GR, Tartagni M, et al. Isobaric laparoscopy using LaparoTenser system in surgical gynecologic oncology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(5): 686–690.
  18. Takeda A, Imoto S, Mori M, et al. Management of large adnexal tumors by isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a wound retractor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 166(2): 185–189.
  19. Takeda A, Hayashi S, Imoto S, et al. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 203: 239–244.
  20. Demirayak G. A different technique in gasless laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 37(5): 622–626.
  21. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, et al. New tool (Laparotenser) for gasless laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(3): 1090–1096.
  22. Casati A, Valentini G, Ferrari S, et al. Cardiorespiratory changes during gynaecological laparoscopy by abdominal wall elevation: comparison with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 78(1): 51–54.
  23. Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Lindgren L. Gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of postoperative recovery with conventional technique. Br J Anaesth. 1996; 77(5): 576–580.
  24. Son JS, Oh JY, Ko S. Effects of hypercapnia on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(11): 4576–4582.
  25. Kim MiK, Hwang JHa, Kim JH, et al. Gasless Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with New Abdominal-Wall Retraction System. JSLS. 2020; 24(1).
  26. Kaloo P, Armstrong S, Kaloo C, et al. Interventions to reduce shoulder pain following gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 1(1): CD011101.
  27. Sao CH, Chan-Tiopianco M, Chung KC, et al. Pain after laparoscopic surgery: Focus on shoulder-tip pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019; 82(11): 819–826.
  28. Hwang JHa, Kim SR, Kim JH, et al. Gasless single-port access laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor in patients undergoing adnexal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(6): 2457–2464.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl