Vol 93, No 11 (2022)
Editorial
Published online: 2022-11-23

open access

Page views 3677
Article views/downloads 342
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Minimally invasive surgery in gynecology. Reconciling the past with a view to the future

Rafal Stojko1, Marcin Sadlocha2
Pubmed: 36448348
Ginekol Pol 2022;93(11):859-860.

Abstract

Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, et al. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17(2): 167–175.
  2. Stojko R, Malinowski A, Baranowski W, et al. Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians for removal of the uterus by vaginal, laparoscopic and abdominal routes. Ginekologia Polska. 2020; 91(6): 352–361.
  3. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017; 129(6): e155–e159.
  4. Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(8): CD003677.
  5. Pogoda KA, Malinowski A, Majchrzak-Baczmanska D, et al. The analysis of vaginal hysterectomy results depending on the uterine size. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(5): 339–343.
  6. Balikoglu M, Bayraktar B, Filiz D, et al. The effect of experience on the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery: 1295 cases. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(9): 681–685.
  7. Monist MJ, Skorupski P, Warda P, et al. Ureteric injury after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a report of 3 cases and brief literature review. Ginekol Pol. 2022; 93(7): 585–590.
  8. Misal M, Delara R, Wasson MN. Cost-effective minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: emphasizing surgical efficiency. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 32(4): 243–247.
  9. https://grupamedica.pl/wydarzenia/i-miedzynarodowy-kongres-ginekologii-operacyjnej/ (19.11.2022).