open access
Prehabilitation in gynecological oncology – are we ready to implement the program in polish oncological centers?
Affiliations- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Cen-ter of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland, Poland
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, University Clinical Center of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Com-prehensive Cancer Center, Germany
open access
Abstract
Objectives: Prehabilitation is a concept of holistic approach to the patient and includes preoperative efforts focused on optimalization of patient’s general condition. The idea of prehabilitation started at the beginning of the 21st century. However, prehabilitation programs in gynecological cancer patients are not standardized and are heterogeneous. The aim of the study it to present the concept of prehabilitation and propose prehabilitation protocol to be introduced in Polish oncological centers. Material and methods: A search in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO databases was conducted using the following keywords: prehabilitation, gynecological, abdominal surgery, and cancer. The primary outcomes were complications, hospitalization stay, intensive care unit transfer rate, blood loss, wound healing, and reoperation rate. The search was performed in July 2022 and covered the period from 1st January 2000 till 30th June 2022. Results: A total number of 1,118 articles have been identified. Out of all eligible papers only 42 fulfilled the research criteria and were included in the study. The analysis showed that there is no standardized prehabilitation protocol for gynecological cancer surgery, although most include three-modal approach — physical activity, nutrition, and psychological intervention. There is no standard model for physical capacity evaluation, however, 1,118 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is the most common. Frailty evaluation is based on different measurements that prevent from direct comparison of obtained results between studies. Conclusions: We are not ready to implement the prehabilitation program in polish oncological centers. The main reason elvicz is: lack of accredited ovarian cancer centers, lack of well-established standardized prehabilitation programs for gynecological malignancies (ovarian cancer especially), and lack of proper information for patients about advantages of adequate preparation elvic expected surgery. Furter studies on different prehabilitation programs and information campaigns both for patients and gynecologist are required to make implementing prehabilitation possible in Poland.
Abstract
Objectives: Prehabilitation is a concept of holistic approach to the patient and includes preoperative efforts focused on optimalization of patient’s general condition. The idea of prehabilitation started at the beginning of the 21st century. However, prehabilitation programs in gynecological cancer patients are not standardized and are heterogeneous. The aim of the study it to present the concept of prehabilitation and propose prehabilitation protocol to be introduced in Polish oncological centers. Material and methods: A search in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO databases was conducted using the following keywords: prehabilitation, gynecological, abdominal surgery, and cancer. The primary outcomes were complications, hospitalization stay, intensive care unit transfer rate, blood loss, wound healing, and reoperation rate. The search was performed in July 2022 and covered the period from 1st January 2000 till 30th June 2022. Results: A total number of 1,118 articles have been identified. Out of all eligible papers only 42 fulfilled the research criteria and were included in the study. The analysis showed that there is no standardized prehabilitation protocol for gynecological cancer surgery, although most include three-modal approach — physical activity, nutrition, and psychological intervention. There is no standard model for physical capacity evaluation, however, 1,118 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is the most common. Frailty evaluation is based on different measurements that prevent from direct comparison of obtained results between studies. Conclusions: We are not ready to implement the prehabilitation program in polish oncological centers. The main reason elvicz is: lack of accredited ovarian cancer centers, lack of well-established standardized prehabilitation programs for gynecological malignancies (ovarian cancer especially), and lack of proper information for patients about advantages of adequate preparation elvic expected surgery. Furter studies on different prehabilitation programs and information campaigns both for patients and gynecologist are required to make implementing prehabilitation possible in Poland.
Keywords
prehabilitation, ERAS; gynecological oncology; gynecological cancer; surgery
About this articleTitle
Prehabilitation in gynecological oncology – are we ready to implement the program in polish oncological centers?
Journal
Issue
Article type
Review paper
Published online
2024-01-11
Page views
249
Article views/downloads
196
DOI
Pubmed
Keywords
prehabilitation
ERAS
gynecological oncology
gynecological cancer
surgery
Authors
Marcin Zebalski
Wojciech Szanecki
Paula Szostek
Krzysztof Nowosielski
References (75)- Durrand J, Singh SJ, Danjoux G. Prehabilitation. Clin Med (Lond). 2019; 19(6): 458–464.
- Schneider S, Armbrust R, Spies C, et al. Prehabilitation programs and ERAS protocols in gynecological oncology: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301(2): 315–326.
- Ebner F, Schulz SV, de Gregorio A, et al. Prehabilitation in gynecological surgery? What do gynecologists know and need to know. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 297(1): 27–31.
- Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29(4): 651–668.
- Carli F, Brown R, Kennepohl S. Prehabilitation to enhance postoperative recovery for an octogenarian following robotic-assisted hysterectomy with endometrial cancer. Can J Anaesth. 2012; 59(8): 779–784.
- Davis JF, van Rooijen SJ, Grimmett C, et al. From theory to practice: an international approach to establishing prehabilitation programmes. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2022; 12(1): 129–137.
- Faithfull S, Turner L, Poole K, et al. Prehabilitation for adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of long-term physical function, nutrition and patient-reported outcomes. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; 28(4): e13023.
- Bates A, West MA, Jack S. Framework for prehabilitation services. Br J Surg. 2020; 107(2): e11–e14.
- Elsherbini N, Carli F. Advocating for prehabilitation for patients undergoing gynecology-oncology surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022; 48(9): 1875–1881.
- Carli F, Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, et al. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation vs postoperative rehabilitation on 30-day postoperative complications for frail patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(3): 233–242.
- Falandry C, Fauvet R, Alfonsi P, et al. Combining prehabilitation with enhanced recovery programs in gynecological surgery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022; 51(5): 102376.
- Dhanis J, Keidan N, Blake D, et al. Prehabilitation to improve outcomes of patients with gynaecological cancer: a new window of opportunity? Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(14).
- Saggu RK, Barlow P, Butler J, et al. Considerations for multimodal prehabilitation in women with gynaecological cancers: a scoping review using realist principles. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1): 300.
- Orange ST, Northgraves MJ, Marshall P, et al. Exercise prehabilitation in elective intra-cavity surgery: a role within the ERAS pathway? A narrative review. Int J Surg. 2018; 56: 328–333.
- Polen-De C, Langstraat C, Asiedu GB, et al. Advanced ovarian cancer patients identify opportunities for prehabilitation: a qualitative study. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2021; 36: 100731.
- Fotopoulou C, Planchamp F, Aytulu T, et al. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines for the peri-operative management of advanced ovarian cancer patients undergoing debulking surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021; 31(9): 1199–1206.
- Carli F, Zavorsky GS. Optimizing functional exercise capacity in the elderly surgical population. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005; 8(1): 23–32.
- Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. Anesthesiology. 2014; 121(5): 937–947.
- Gillis C, Loiselle SE, Fiore JF, et al. Prehabilitation with whey protein supplementation on perioperative functional exercise capacity in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer: a pilot double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116(5): 802–812.
- Soares SM, Nucci LB, da Silva MM, et al. Pulmonary function and physical performance outcomes with preoperative physical therapy in upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013; 27(7): 616–627.
- Barberan-Garcia A, Ubré M, Roca J, et al. Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 267(1): 50–56.
- Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(8): 1187–1197.
- Steffens D, Young J, Riedel B, et al. PrehabIlitation with preoperatIve exercise and education for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL). BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1): 443.
- Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, et al. Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: pragmatic, double blinded, multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2018; 360: j5916.
- Dunne DFJ, Jack S, Jones RP, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection. Br J Surg. 2016; 103(5): 504–512.
- van Rooijen S, Carli F, Dalton S, et al. Multimodal prehabilitation in colorectal cancer patients to improve functional capacity and reduce postoperative complications: the first international randomized controlled trial for multimodal prehabilitation. BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1): 98.
- Díaz-Feijoo B, Agusti N, Sebio R, et al. A multimodal prehabilitation program for the reduction of post-operative complications after surgery in advanced ovarian cancer under an ERAS pathway: a randomized multicenter trial (SOPHIE). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
- Prehabilitation in Gynaecological Cancer Patients (PHOCUS). Brill’s New Pauly. .
- Home-Based Telemonitoring Program for Functional Recovery and Symptoms in Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, or Gynecologic Cancer Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04596384.
- Prehabilitation plus enhanced recovery after surgery versus enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological surgery. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04505111 (2022-08-27).
- Lambaudie E, Bannier/Braticevic C, Villaron/Goetgheluck C, et al. TRAINING-Ovary 01 (connected prehabiliation pelvIc cancer surgery): multicenter randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients managed for ovarian cancer with or without a connected pre-habilitation program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021; 31(6): 920–924.
- Optimizing prehabilitation in gynecologic oncology. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04298827 (2022-08-27).
- Prehabilitation & rehabilitation in oncogeriatrics: adaptation to deconditioning risk and accompaniment of patients' trajectories-ovary/elderly women with ovarian cancer-2, a GINECO Multicenter Randomized Stud. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04284969 (2022-08-27).
- Multicenter randomized study comparing neo adjuvant chemotherapy for patients managed for ovarian cancer with or without a connected prehabilitation program. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04451369 (2022-08-27).
- Multimodal intensive prehabilitation in high impact surgery to reduce postoperative complications. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL8699 (2022-08-27).
- Li C, Carli F, Lee L, et al. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(4): 1072–1082.
- Diaz-Feijoo B, Agusti-Garcia N, Sebio R, et al. Feasibility of a multimodal prehabilitation programme in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: a pilot study. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).
- Miralpeix E, Sole-Sedeno JM, Rodriguez-Cosmen C, et al. Impact of prehabilitation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery on ovarian cancer patients: a pilot study. World J Surg Oncol. 2022; 20(1): 46.
- Daniels SL, Lee MJ, George J, et al. Prehabilitation in elective abdominal cancer surgery in older patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. 2020 [Epub ahead of print]; 4(6): 1022–1041.
- Carli F, Bousquet-Dion G, Awasthi R, et al. Effect of multimodal prehabilitation vs postoperative rehabilitation on 30-day postoperative complications for frail patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155(3): 233–242.
- Yan X, Zhang S, Jia J, et al. Exploring the malnutrition status and impact of total parenteral nutrition on the outcome of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1): 799.
- Myers K, Hajek P, Hinds C, et al. Stopping smoking shortly before surgery and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(11): 983–989.
- Tønnesen H, Nielsen PR, Lauritzen JB, et al. Smoking and alcohol intervention before surgery: evidence for best practice. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102(3): 297–306.
- Rockwood K. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2005; 173(5): 489–495.
- Broad A, Carter B, Mckelvie S, et al. The convergent validity of the electronic Frailty Index (eFI) with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Geriatrics (Basel). 2020; 5(4).
- Uchmanowicz I, Lisiak M, Jankowska-Polańska B. Research instruments used in the assessment of the frailty syndrome. Gerontologia Polska. 2014; 22: 1–8.
- Schumacher AN, Shackelford DYK, Brown JM, et al. Validation of the 6-min Walk Test for Predicting Peak V˙O2 in cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(2): 271–277.
- Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H, et al. Six-minute walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power (VO max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 [Epub ahead of print].
- Ross RM, Murthy JN, Wollak ID, et al. The six minute walk test accurately estimates mean peak oxygen uptake. BMC Pulm Med. 2010; 10: 31.
- Burr JF, Bredin SSD, Faktor MD, et al. The 6-minute walk test as a predictor of objectively measured aerobic fitness in healthy working-aged adults. Phys Sportsmed. 2011; 39(2): 133–139.
- Deka P, Pozehl BJ, Pathak D, et al. Predicting maximal oxygen uptake from the 6 min walk test in patients with heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8(1): 47–54.
- Kang S, Yoo S, Baek H, et al. Potentials of Smart dynamometer use for clinical and self-management of rehabilitation in breast cancer survivors: a feasibility study. Biomed Eng Lett. 2019; 9(2): 211–219.
- Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63 Suppl 11(0 11): S467–S472.
- Paradowski J, Tomaszewski KA, Bereza K, et al. Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-OV28 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in women with ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014; 14(1): 157–163.
- Straubhar AM, Filippova OT, Cowan RA, et al. A multimodality triage algorithm to improve cytoreductive outcomes in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center team ovary initiative. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 158(3): 608–613.
- Miralpeix E, Mancebo G, Gayete S, et al. Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29(8): 1235–1243.
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2): 205–213.
- Rasekaba T, Lee AL, Naughton MT, et al. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Intern Med J. 2009; 39(8): 495–501.
- Boereboom C, Doleman B, Lund JN, et al. Systematic review of pre-operative exercise in colorectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2016; 20(2): 81–89.
- Levett DZH, Grocott MPW. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, prehabilitation, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Can J Anaesth. 2015; 62(2): 131–142.
- Whittle J, Wischmeyer PE, Grocott MPW, et al. Surgical prehabilitation: nutrition and exercise. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018; 36(4): 567–580.
- Valkenet K, Port Iv, Dronkers J, et al. The effects of preoperative exercise therapy on postoperative outcome: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2010; 25(2): 99–111.
- Heger P, Probst P, Wiskemann J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of physical exercise prehabilitation in major abdominal surgery (PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017080366). J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 24(6): 1375–1385.
- Evans DC, Martindale RG, Kiraly LN, et al. Nutrition optimization prior to surgery. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014; 29(1): 10–21.
- Kabata P, Jastrzębski T, Kąkol M, et al. Preoperative nutritional support in cancer patients with no clinical signs of malnutrition--prospective randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015; 23(2): 365–370.
- de Almeida EPM, de Almeida JP, Landoni G, et al. Early mobilization programme improves functional capacity after major abdominal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119(5): 900–907.
- Powell R, Scott NW, Manyande A, et al. Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2016(5): CD008646.
- Dronkers JJ, Chorus AMJ, van Meeteren NLU, et al. The association of pre-operative physical fitness and physical activity with outcome after scheduled major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68(1): 67–73.
- Moran J, Guinan E, McCormick P, et al. The ability of prehabilitation to influence postoperative outcome after intra-abdominal operation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2016; 160(5): 1189–1201.
- Hughes MJ, Hackney RJ, Lamb PJ, et al. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019; 43(7): 1661–1668.
- Hulzebos EHJ, Helders PJM, Favié NJ, et al. Preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296(15): 1851–1857.
- Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, et al. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133(4): 253–262.
- Jie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, et al. Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012; 28(10): 1022–1027.
- Rimer J, Dwan K, Lawlor D, et al. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012.
- van der Zanden V, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Paarlberg KM, et al. Presurgery thoughts - thoughts on prehabilitation in oncologic gynecologic surgery, a qualitative template analysis in older adults and their healthcare professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2022; 44(20): 5930–5940.
