open access
Changes and analysis of transvaginal forceps delivery rate in primary hospitals in the past 10 years
Affiliations- Shanghai Jiading District maternal and child care hospital, NO.1226， Gaotai Road， Jiading District， Shanghai, 201821 Shanghai, China
open access
Abstract
Objectives: This study analyzed the changes of vaginal forceps delivery rate in Jiading Maternal and Child Health Hospital
in the past 10 years in order to provide theoretical reference for reducing the rate of cesarean section and solving cephalic
dystocia.
Material and methods: The basic information, delivery means and vaginal forceps indication of 78,811 parturients who
gave birth in our hospital between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and statistical
analysis was carried out by analysis of variance and Chi-square test.
Results: In the past 10 years, there was a significant difference in the rate of vaginal forceps use among different years
(p < 0. 05). With 2014 as the turning point, the rate of forceps use increased the fastest, from 0.7% in 2013 to 3.3% in
2016. The main indications of forceps increased use in our hospital from high to low were fetal distress, abnormal occipital
position, prolongation of the second stage of labor and shortening of the second stage of labor. And there was significant
difference among different years (p < 0.000). Although there was no significant difference among the years of labor forceps
use in patients with prolonged second stage of labor and abnormal occipital position (p > 0.05), the proportion of forceps
delivery in the second stage of labor was gradually decreased with 2014 as the dividing line. Although there was significant
difference among the patients who shortened the second stage of labor (X2 = 23,886, p < 0.01), it ranked fourth all the time.
Conclusions: In the past 10 years, the rate of forceps use has been on the rise. With the implementation of the new stage of
labor and painless delivery in 2014, vaginal forceps have become the main means to solve the problem of cephalic dystocia.
Abstract
Objectives: This study analyzed the changes of vaginal forceps delivery rate in Jiading Maternal and Child Health Hospital
in the past 10 years in order to provide theoretical reference for reducing the rate of cesarean section and solving cephalic
dystocia.
Material and methods: The basic information, delivery means and vaginal forceps indication of 78,811 parturients who
gave birth in our hospital between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and statistical
analysis was carried out by analysis of variance and Chi-square test.
Results: In the past 10 years, there was a significant difference in the rate of vaginal forceps use among different years
(p < 0. 05). With 2014 as the turning point, the rate of forceps use increased the fastest, from 0.7% in 2013 to 3.3% in
2016. The main indications of forceps increased use in our hospital from high to low were fetal distress, abnormal occipital
position, prolongation of the second stage of labor and shortening of the second stage of labor. And there was significant
difference among different years (p < 0.000). Although there was no significant difference among the years of labor forceps
use in patients with prolonged second stage of labor and abnormal occipital position (p > 0.05), the proportion of forceps
delivery in the second stage of labor was gradually decreased with 2014 as the dividing line. Although there was significant
difference among the patients who shortened the second stage of labor (X2 = 23,886, p < 0.01), it ranked fourth all the time.
Conclusions: In the past 10 years, the rate of forceps use has been on the rise. With the implementation of the new stage of
labor and painless delivery in 2014, vaginal forceps have become the main means to solve the problem of cephalic dystocia.
Keywords
vaginal forceps; low forceps; forceps rate
About this articleTitle
Changes and analysis of transvaginal forceps delivery rate in primary hospitals in the past 10 years
Journal
Issue
Article type
Review paper
Pages
711-716
Published online
2019-12-31
Page views
1205
Article views/downloads
853
DOI
Pubmed
Bibliographic record
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(12):711-716.
Keywords
vaginal forceps
low forceps
forceps rate
Authors
Liang Qiufeng
Xi Jie
Wang Xiahong
Yang Lixin
References (14)- Yu Xinshuan, Qi Hongbo. Low forceps midwifery [J/CD]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric first Aid. 2018; 7(3): 144–147.
- Zhu Lin, Zhang Xiaoyan, Bao Di, etc. The significance of forceps in reducing the rate of cesarean section [J]. Armed Police Medicine. 2015; 26(12): 1196–1198.
- Ren Nianzhen. Clinical analysis of 119 cases of cesarean section forceps [J]. Forum on Primary Medicine. 2015; 19(8): 1150–1151.
- Qi Huiyi, Wang Liaoju. Clinical analysis of 48 cases of caesarean section forceps [J]. Chinese Maternal and Child Health Research. 2010; 21(3): 66–367.
- Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 154: Operative vaginal delivery [J]. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(5): e56–e65.
- Rossignol M, Chaillet N, Boughrassa F, et al. Interrelations between four antepartum obstetric interventions and cesarean delivery in women at low risk: a systematic review and modeling of the cascade of interventions. Birth. 2014; 41(1): 70–78.
- Practice Bulletin No. 154. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015; 126(5): e56–e65.
- American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.. Operative vaginal delivery. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 74(1): 69–76.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Operative vaginal delivery (Green-top guideline: no. 26) [EB/OL] （2011-01-19）[2016-06-02] https://www rcog org uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg26.
- Cargill YM, MacKinnon CJ, Cargill YM, et al. Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee. Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004; 26(8): 747–761.
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Credit Association of Chinese Medical Association obstetrics and Gynecology Section. Expert consensus on new labor process standards and handling. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 49(7): 486.
- Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014; 123(3): 693–711.
- Moreau R, Pham MT, Brun X, et al. Assessment of forceps use in obstetrics during a simulated childbirth. Int J Med Robot. 2008; 4(4): 373–380.
- Yang Lu, Tan Lizhen. Clinical analysis of 120 cases of low forceps [J]. Clinical Medical Engineering. 2017; 24(1): 71.
