Vol 90, No 7 (2019)
Research paper
Published online: 2019-07-26

open access

Page views 2226
Article views/downloads 1648
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Maternal factors, ultrasound and placental function parameters in early pregnancy as predictors of birth weight in low-risk populations and among patients with pre-gestational diabetes

Anna Gasiorowska1, Agnieszka Zawiejska2, Piotr Dydowicz3, Ewa Wender-Ozegowska2, Grzegorz Poprawski4, Kinga Tobola-Wrobel5, Katarzyna Ziolkowska6, Marek Pietryga35
Pubmed: 31392708
Ginekol Pol 2019;90(7):388-395.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our work was to assess the usefulness of maternal factors, ultrasound and placental function parameters during early pregnancy as predictors of birth weight in populations of healthy pregnant women and women suffering from pregestational diabetes.

Material and methods: A study group comprised 97 healthy women and 160 women with pregestational diabetes (PGDM, type 1), all in singleton pregnancy. Ultrasound examination was performed between weeks 11 and 14, and in weeks 20 and 30 of gestation, based on recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Ultrasonography Division. We also checked uterine artery blood flow parameters. During the first trimester consultation, all patients were surveyed and the following data were collected: age, BMI, reproductive history, comorbidities and smoking. We also collected blood samples and assessed PlGF, PAPP-A, and BhCG levels.

Results: Our study showed that newborn birth weight negatively correlated with mother’s age, her diastolic blood pressure, PI of her uterine arteries and BhCG protein levels. Moreover, birth weight directly correlated with PlGF and PAPPA-A protein levels, and maternal early-pregnancy BMI.

Conclusions: LGA diagnosis in the first trimester of pregnancy allows for selection and modification of some risk factors and closer monitoring of endangered fetuses throughout the pregnancy, with emphasis on the perinatal period. Parameters with confirmed usefulness in the prediction of birth weight in the first trimester included: maternal age, BMI, blood pressure, PAPP-A, BhCG and PlGF levels, fetal CRL and uterine artery PI.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Bomba-Opoń D, Drews K, Huras H, et al. Polish Gynecological Society Recommendations for Labor Induction. Ginekol Pol. 2017; 88(4): 224–234.
  2. Ropacka-Lesiak M. Wewnątrzmaciczne ograniczenie wzrastania płodu. In: Bręborowicz GH. ed. Położnictwo Tom 2: Medycyna matczyno-płodowa. PZWL, Warszawa 2012: 105–117.
  3. Baschat AA, Galan lH, Gabbe SG. Wewnątrzmaciczne zahamowanie wzrastania płodu. In: Dębski R, Oszukowski P. ed. Położnictwo. Ciąża prawidłowa i powikłana. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2014: 146–181.
  4. Hirnle L, Kowalska M, Petrus A, et al. [The analysis of risk factors for fetal macrosomia and the complications in the course of pregnancy and delivery of macrosomic baby]. Ginekol Pol. 2007; 78(4): 280–283.
  5. Swierzewska P, Kosiński M, Wójcik M, et al. Family, anthropometric and biochemical factors affecting birth weight of infants born to GDM women. Ginekol Pol. 2015; 86(7): 499–503.
  6. Ornoy A. Prenatal origin of obesity and their complications: Gestational diabetes, maternal overweight and the paradoxical effects of fetal growth restriction and macrosomia. Reprod Toxicol. 2011; 32(2): 205–212.
  7. Nicolaides KH. A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks' assessment. Prenat Diagn. 2011; 31(1): 3–6.
  8. Poon LCY, Karagiannis G, Stratieva V, et al. First-trimester prediction of macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 29(2): 139–147.
  9. Papastefanou I, Souka AP, Pilalis A, et al. First trimester prediction of small- and large-for-gestation neonates by an integrated model incorporating ultrasound parameters, biochemical indices and maternal characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(1): 104–111.
  10. Syngelaki A, Bredaki FE, Vaikousi E, et al. Body mass index at 11-13 weeks' gestation and pregnancy complications. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011; 30(4): 250–265.
  11. Frick AP, Syngelaki A, Zheng M, et al. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal factors and biomarkers in the three trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47(3): 332–339.
  12. Rossi A, Vogrig E, Ganzitti L, et al. Prediction of large-for-gestation neonates with first-trimester maternal serum PAPP-A. Minerva Ginecol. 2014; 66(5): 443–447.
  13. González González NL, Plasencia W, González Dávila E, et al. First and second trimester screening for large for gestational age infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26(16): 1635–1640.
  14. Nanda S, Akolekar R, Sarquis R, et al. Maternal serum adiponectin at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation in the prediction of macrosomia. Prenat Diagn. 2011; 31(5): 479–483.
  15. Boucoiran I, Djemli A, Taillefer C, et al. First-trimester prediction of birth weight. Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30(8): 665–672.
  16. Migda M, Migda MS, Migda B, et al. Maternal first trimester parameters in the prediction of excessive fetal growth in pregnant women with metabolic syndrome. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017; 68(6): 833–839.