open access

Vol 89, No 9 (2018)
Research paper
Published online: 2018-09-28
Get Citation

Pre-vaccination prevalence of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) in women from Kosovo and their related sociodemographic characteristics

Pranvera Zejnullahu Raçi1, Lea Hošnjak2, Mario Poljak2, Snježana Židovec Lepej3, Adriana Vince45
·
Pubmed: 30318575
·
Ginekol Pol 2018;89(9):485-494.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, University “Hasan Prishtina”, Lagja e Spitalit n.n, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo.
  2. Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  3. Department of Molecular Diagnostics and Flow Cytometry, Dr. Fran Mihaljević University Hospital for Infectious Diseases Zagreb, Croatia
  4. Department of Viral Hepatitis, Dr. Fran Mihaljević University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia
  5. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

open access

Vol 89, No 9 (2018)
ORIGINAL PAPERS Gynecology
Published online: 2018-09-28

Abstract

Objectives: Kosovo’s current health care system does not support organized nationwide cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs. To date, no reliable data are available on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Kosovo, or on high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) prevalence and HPV type distribution. Our aim is to determinate the pre-vaccination prevalence and distribution of HR-HPVs and to assesses the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and increased risk of HPV infection in women from Kosovo.

Material and methods: Detection of HR-HPV DNA in cytologically evaluated cervical smears was performed using a clinically validated Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test, Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test, HPV52 type-specific real-time PCR and an in-house GP5+/GP6+/68 PCR.

Results: The crude overall prevalence of any of the HR-HPVs was estimated at 13.1% (26/199; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1–18.5%), with HPV16 being the most common type (7/26, 26.9%), followed by HPV31 and HPV51, each detected in 4/26 (15.4%) cervical specimens, HPV18, detected in 3/26 (11.5%) specimens, HPV52 and HPV66, each detected in 2/26 (7.7%) specimens, and HPV33, HPV45, HPV56, and HPV58, each detected in a single (3.9%) specimen. Women over 40 (OR = 0.36), older than 18 at sexual debut (odds ratio (OR) = 0.28), those that had delivered at least one child (OR = 0.32), and those that had a history of pregnancy termination (OR = 0.39) were at lower risk for HPV infection.

Conclusion: Because more than 70% of cervical precancerous lesions could have been prevented in Kosovo using nationwide HPV-based cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, it is of outmost importance to implement both programs in the national health care system as soon as possible.

Abstract

Objectives: Kosovo’s current health care system does not support organized nationwide cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs. To date, no reliable data are available on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Kosovo, or on high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) prevalence and HPV type distribution. Our aim is to determinate the pre-vaccination prevalence and distribution of HR-HPVs and to assesses the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and increased risk of HPV infection in women from Kosovo.

Material and methods: Detection of HR-HPV DNA in cytologically evaluated cervical smears was performed using a clinically validated Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test, Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test, HPV52 type-specific real-time PCR and an in-house GP5+/GP6+/68 PCR.

Results: The crude overall prevalence of any of the HR-HPVs was estimated at 13.1% (26/199; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1–18.5%), with HPV16 being the most common type (7/26, 26.9%), followed by HPV31 and HPV51, each detected in 4/26 (15.4%) cervical specimens, HPV18, detected in 3/26 (11.5%) specimens, HPV52 and HPV66, each detected in 2/26 (7.7%) specimens, and HPV33, HPV45, HPV56, and HPV58, each detected in a single (3.9%) specimen. Women over 40 (OR = 0.36), older than 18 at sexual debut (odds ratio (OR) = 0.28), those that had delivered at least one child (OR = 0.32), and those that had a history of pregnancy termination (OR = 0.39) were at lower risk for HPV infection.

Conclusion: Because more than 70% of cervical precancerous lesions could have been prevented in Kosovo using nationwide HPV-based cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination, it is of outmost importance to implement both programs in the national health care system as soon as possible.

Get Citation

Keywords

cervical cancer, high-risk human papillomaviruses, Kosovo, prevalence, vaccination

About this article
Title

Pre-vaccination prevalence of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) in women from Kosovo and their related sociodemographic characteristics

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 89, No 9 (2018)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

485-494

Published online

2018-09-28

Page views

1966

Article views/downloads

1206

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2018.0083

Pubmed

30318575

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2018;89(9):485-494.

Keywords

cervical cancer
high-risk human papillomaviruses
Kosovo
prevalence
vaccination

Authors

Pranvera Zejnullahu Raçi
Lea Hošnjak
Mario Poljak
Snježana Židovec Lepej
Adriana Vince

References (30)
  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136(5): E359–E386.
  2. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, et al. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(4): 524–548.
  3. Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, et al. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. A review of human carcinogens--Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10(4): 321–322.
  4. de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, et al. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017; 141(4): 664–670.
  5. de Sanjosé S, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, et al. Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007; 7(7): 453–459.
  6. Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, et al. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis. 2010; 202(12): 1789–1799.
  7. Guan P, Howell-Jones R, Li Ni, et al. Human papillomavirus types in 115,789 HPV-positive women: a meta-analysis from cervical infection to cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012; 131(10): 2349–2359.
  8. Li Ni, Franceschi S, Howell-Jones R, et al. Human papillomavirus type distribution in 30,848 invasive cervical cancers worldwide: Variation by geographical region, histological type and year of publication. Int J Cancer. 2011; 128(4): 927–935.
  9. Alemany L, de Sanjosé S, Tous S, et al. RIS HPV TT Study Group. Time trends of human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer, from 1940 to 2007. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135(1): 88–95.
  10. Huang S, Tang N, Mak WB, et al. Principles and analytical performance of Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2009; 45: S13–S17.
  11. Poljak M, Ostrbenk A, Seme K, et al. Comparison of clinical and analytical performance of the Abbott Realtime High Risk HPV test to the performance of hybrid capture 2 in population-based cervical cancer screening. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(5): 1721–1729.
  12. Carozzi FM, Burroni E, Bisanzi S, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test with that of hybrid capture 2 assay in a screening setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(4): 1446–1451.
  13. Kocjan BJ, Poljak M, Seme K. Universal ProbeLibrary based real-time PCR assay for detection and confirmation of human papillomavirus genotype 52 infections. J Virol Methods. 2010; 163(2): 492–494.
  14. Učakar V, Poljak M, Klavs I. Pre-vaccination prevalence and distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types in Slovenian women: a cervical cancer screening based study. Vaccine. 2012; 30(2): 116–120.
  15. Poljak M, Seme K, Maver PJ, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type-distribution, cervical cancer screening practices and current status of vaccination implementation in Central and Eastern Europe. Vaccine. 2013; 31 Suppl 7: H59–H70.
  16. Kovachev S, Slavov V, Kovachev S, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in women in some cities and regions of Bulgaria. J Med Virol. 2013; 85(9): 1577–1584.
  17. Tachezy R, Smahelova J, Kaspirkova J, et al. Human papillomavirus type-specific prevalence in the cervical cancer screening population of Czech women. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e79156.
  18. Moga MA, Irimie M, Oanta A, et al. Type-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus by cervical cytology among women in Brasov, Romania. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(16): 6887–6892.
  19. Duvlis S, Popovska-Jankovic K, Arsova ZS, et al. HPV E6/E7 mRNA versus HPV DNA biomarker in cervical cancer screening of a group of Macedonian women. J Med Virol. 2015; 87(9): 1578–1586.
  20. Simanaviciene V, Gudleviciene Z, Popendikyte V, et al. Studies on the prevalence of oncogenic HPV types among Lithuanian women with cervical pathology. J Med Virol. 2015; 87(3): 461–471.
  21. Kovacevic G, Nikolic N, Jovanovic-Galovic A, et al. Frequency of twelve carcinogenic human papilloma virus types among women from the South Backa region, Vojvodina, Serbia. Turk J Med Sci. 2016; 46(1): 97–104.
  22. Staykova J, Belovska T, Murad A, et al. Cervical Viral Infections among Asymptomatic Bulgarian Women. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016; 24(3): 176–179.
  23. Sabol I, Milutin Gašperov N, Matovina M, et al. Cervical HPV type-specific pre-vaccination prevalence and age distribution in Croatia. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7): e0180480.
  24. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Zaridze D, et al. Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017-40: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(10): 1445–1452.
  25. Poljak M, Kocjan B, Oštrbenk A, et al. Commercially available molecular tests for human papillomaviruses (HPV): 2015 update. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2016; 76: S3–S13.
  26. Jit M, Brisson M, Portnoy A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of female human papillomavirus vaccination in 179 countries: a PRIME modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2(7): e406–e414.
  27. Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, et al. Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: a pooled analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(7): e453–e463.
  28. Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Schünemann HJ, et al. Guideline Support Group. World Health Organization Guidelines for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 and screen-and-treat strategies to prevent cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 132(3): 252–258.
  29. Quint W, Jenkins D, Molijn A, et al. One virus, one lesion--individual components of CIN lesions contain a specific HPV type. J Pathol. 2012; 227(1): 62–71.
  30. Gargano JW, Nisenbaum R, Lee DR, et al. Age-group differences in human papillomavirus types and cofactors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 among women referred to colposcopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21(1): 111–121.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl