open access

Vol 78, No 5 (2007)
ARTICLES
Get Citation

The efficacy of SUI treatment with Burch colposuspension evaluated with use of ITT analysis

Grzegorz Surkont, Edyta Wlaźlak, Aldona Dunicz-Sokołowska, Jacek Suzin
Ginekol Pol 2007;78(5).

open access

Vol 78, No 5 (2007)
ARTICLES

Abstract

Objectives: Search for methods of assessment of effects of SUI treatment, which goal is to minimize risk of bias, are inconclusive and remain the subject of investigation. Design: The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of application of different methods of efficacy measurement of SUI treatment with use of Burch colposuspension on final conclusions concerning the treatment effects. Material and methods: Prospective investigation was carried out among 50 women with SUI symptoms II or III degree, scheduled for Burch colposuspension. The analysis of obtained results was carried out with use of ITT and modified ITT. To compare, therapy effects were explored with the use of principles which have been, until quite recently, most often used in urogynecology. Results: Differences in percentage of cured, based on results of several urogynecologic examinations according to method of analysis (previously used method, ITT, modified ITT), have oscillated between 3% to 20%. Conclusions: 1. While selecting diagnostic methods to analyze SUI treatment effectiveness, potential problems with obtaining complete data after the treatment should be taken into account. 2. In order to minimize statistic bias, the usage of few methods of analysis of obtained results is highly recommended.

Abstract

Objectives: Search for methods of assessment of effects of SUI treatment, which goal is to minimize risk of bias, are inconclusive and remain the subject of investigation. Design: The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of application of different methods of efficacy measurement of SUI treatment with use of Burch colposuspension on final conclusions concerning the treatment effects. Material and methods: Prospective investigation was carried out among 50 women with SUI symptoms II or III degree, scheduled for Burch colposuspension. The analysis of obtained results was carried out with use of ITT and modified ITT. To compare, therapy effects were explored with the use of principles which have been, until quite recently, most often used in urogynecology. Results: Differences in percentage of cured, based on results of several urogynecologic examinations according to method of analysis (previously used method, ITT, modified ITT), have oscillated between 3% to 20%. Conclusions: 1. While selecting diagnostic methods to analyze SUI treatment effectiveness, potential problems with obtaining complete data after the treatment should be taken into account. 2. In order to minimize statistic bias, the usage of few methods of analysis of obtained results is highly recommended.
Get Citation

Keywords

urinary incontinence stress - surgery, Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects, Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods, gynecologic surgery procedures - methods

About this article
Title

The efficacy of SUI treatment with Burch colposuspension evaluated with use of ITT analysis

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 78, No 5 (2007)

Page views

541

Article views/downloads

740

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2007;78(5).

Keywords

urinary incontinence stress - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
gynecologic surgery procedures - methods

Authors

Grzegorz Surkont
Edyta Wlaźlak
Aldona Dunicz-Sokołowska
Jacek Suzin

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl