open access

Vol 83, No 8 (2012)
ARTICLES
Get Citation

A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure

Annette Kuhn, Michael D. Mueller, Martin M. Mueller, Marc U. Baumann
Ginekol Pol 2012;83(8).

open access

Vol 83, No 8 (2012)
ARTICLES

Abstract

Background: Measurements of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) are a part of urodynamic investigations preceding an incontinence surgery and a part of urethral function tests. Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare maximum urethral closure pressure determined by a microtip catheter with those measured by an air-charged catheter. Material and methods: A prospective randomized study in a tertiary referral centre. 122 female patients with urodynamic stress incontinence were randomly assigned to have their urethral pressure profi les measured at rest by both microtip and air-charged catheters. Intervention and Measurements: Each patient had three measurements taken by each catheter type. Means of the measurements were compared with regard to correlation and repeatability. For statistical analysis, an approach proposed by Bland-Altman was applied to assess the agreement between the two techniques. Results: Correlation coeffi cient between MUCP by the air-charged and the microtip catheter was r=0.8507(95% CI 0.7928 – 0.8934; p<0.0001). MUCP by the air-charged catheter was signifi cantly lower than MUCP measured by the microtip catheter. The two-tailed p value was <0.0001, considered extremely signifi cant. (95% CI of the diff erences; mean diff erence = -3.033; mean of paired diff erences -3.730 to -2.335). Discrepancies between measurements of the microtip and the air-charged catheters suggest good agreement between the two catheters since the mean diff erence was 2.8 cmH2O and the 95% CI of agreement were narrow with -0.03319 to 0.3151. Conclusion: Air-charged catheters give lower readings for

Abstract

Background: Measurements of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) are a part of urodynamic investigations preceding an incontinence surgery and a part of urethral function tests. Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare maximum urethral closure pressure determined by a microtip catheter with those measured by an air-charged catheter. Material and methods: A prospective randomized study in a tertiary referral centre. 122 female patients with urodynamic stress incontinence were randomly assigned to have their urethral pressure profi les measured at rest by both microtip and air-charged catheters. Intervention and Measurements: Each patient had three measurements taken by each catheter type. Means of the measurements were compared with regard to correlation and repeatability. For statistical analysis, an approach proposed by Bland-Altman was applied to assess the agreement between the two techniques. Results: Correlation coeffi cient between MUCP by the air-charged and the microtip catheter was r=0.8507(95% CI 0.7928 – 0.8934; p<0.0001). MUCP by the air-charged catheter was signifi cantly lower than MUCP measured by the microtip catheter. The two-tailed p value was <0.0001, considered extremely signifi cant. (95% CI of the diff erences; mean diff erence = -3.033; mean of paired diff erences -3.730 to -2.335). Discrepancies between measurements of the microtip and the air-charged catheters suggest good agreement between the two catheters since the mean diff erence was 2.8 cmH2O and the 95% CI of agreement were narrow with -0.03319 to 0.3151. Conclusion: Air-charged catheters give lower readings for
Get Citation

Keywords

Microtip catheter, Air-charged catheter, Maximum urethral closure pressure, MUCP

About this article
Title

A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure

Journal

Ginekologia Polska

Issue

Vol 83, No 8 (2012)

Bibliographic record

Ginekol Pol 2012;83(8).

Keywords

Microtip catheter
Air-charged catheter
Maximum urethral closure pressure
MUCP

Authors

Annette Kuhn
Michael D. Mueller
Martin M. Mueller
Marc U. Baumann

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl