Professional perspectives on external cephalic version: survey results among Polish midwives and obstetricians
, 12, 3, 1, 1, 1
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Polish midwives and obstetricians concerning external cephalic version (ECV), with particular attention to how professional qualifications, experience, and the reference level of the healthcare facility influenced these factors across both groups.
Material and methods: An author-created, 22-question online survey was distributed separately to midwives and obstetricians, with each group receiving a questionnaire customized to assess their specific knowledge of ECV, professional experience, and attitudes toward the procedure.
Results: The study included 839 participants: 378 midwives and 461 physicians. Knowledge and experience with ECV varied significantly based on work experience and the reference level of the workplace. When comparing the results between midwives and obstetricians, the median (Q1–Q3) score for correct answers on ECV was highest among obstetrics and gynecology residents (5, 3–6), while the lowest scores were seen among midwives with bachelor’s degrees (2, 1–4).
Conclusions: The study identified significant considerable knowledge gaps regarding ECV, particularly among midwives. Educational initiatives targeting both midwives and obstetricians are recommended to encourage the greater use of ECV and potentially reduce the rates of elective cesarean sections in cases of non-cephalic fetal presentations.
Keywords: external cephalic versionbreech presentationdeliverymidwifery
References
- Polish Central Statistical Office data summarizing 2022 year. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/zdrowie-i-ochrona-zdrowia-w-2022-roku,1,13.html (1.09.2024).
- Lim S, Lucero J. Obstetric and anesthetic approaches to external cephalic version. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017; 35(1): 81–94.
- External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation: green-top guideline No. 20a. BJOG. 2017; 124(7): e178–e192.
- Beuckens A, Rijnders M, Verburgt-Doeleman GHM, et al. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives. BJOG. 2016; 123(3): 415–423.
- Fullerton J, Butler M, Aman C, et al. Global competencies for midwives: external cephalic version; ultrasonography, and tobacco cessation intervention. Women Birth. 2019; 32(3): e413–e420.
- Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. How women with high risk pregnancies perceive interactions with healthcare professionals when discussing place of birth: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2016; 38: 42–48.
- Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van Dommelen P, et al. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth. 2010; 37(2): 124–133.
- Manasar-Dyrbus M, Drosdzol-Cop A, Stojko S, et al. Strategies to reduce cesarean deliveries: surveying Polish obstetricians on external cephalic version practices. Ginekol Pol. 2024 [Epub ahead of print].
- Yaacoub EE, Groves RM, Dawy Z, Fowler Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM. Survey Methodology, vol. 337. John Wiley & Sons, 2004 .
- von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4): 344–349.
- Polish Supreme Medical Council — data from the obligatory national registry of Physicians. https://nil.org.pl/rejestry/centralny-rejestr-lekarzy/informacje-statystyczne (15.08.2024).
- Raport o stanie pielęgniartswa i położnictwa w Polsce. https://nipip.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/RAPORT-O-STANIE-PIELEGNIARSTWA-I-P-OLOZNICTWA-W-POLSCE-MAJ-2023.pdf.
- Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3): e34.
- Kennedy HP, Balaam MC, Dahlen H, et al. The role of midwifery and other international insights for maternity care in the United States: an analysis of four countries. Birth. 2020; 47(4): 332–345.
- Amiri A. Role of nurses and midwives in improving patient safety during childbirth: Evidence from obstetric trauma in OECD countries. Appl Nurs Res. 2020; 56: 151343.
- Butler MM, Sheehy L, Kington MM, et al. Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy. Midwifery. 2015; 31(4): 418–425.
- Walker S, Perilakalathil P, Moore J, et al. Standards for midwife practitioners of external cephalic version: a Delphi study. Midwifery. 2015; 31(5): e79–e86.
- Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(6): 513–523.
- Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015(4): CD000083.
- Hakem E, Lindow SW, O'Connell MP, et al. External cephalic version — a 10-year review of practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 258: 414–417.
