Online first
Research paper
Published online: 2025-03-14

open access

Page views 26
Article views/downloads 17
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a comparison between assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception

Gizem Berfin Uluutku Bulutlar1, Eralp Bulutlar2, Büşra Parlak Somuncu3, Çetin Kılıççı2, Pınar Kumru2

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology (ART) versus those conceived spontaneously (SC).

Material and methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included 852 DCDA twin pregnancies, with 591 conceived spontaneously (SC group) and 261 conceived via ART (ART group). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were extracted from the hospital’s automation system and analyzed using statistical methods, including chi-square and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square tests, to account for potential confounding factors.

Results: Our findings indicate that ART twin pregnancies have significantly poorer outcomes compared to SC twin pregnancies. The risk of cerclage application is 12.6 times higher in the ART group. Furthermore, ART pregnancies exhibit a 19.2-fold increased risk of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). The rates of preterm birth, including late preterm, moderate preterm, very preterm, and extremely preterm, are significantly higher in the ART group. Moreover, ART pregnancies are associated with higher incidences of very low birth weight (VLBW), NICU admissions, and neonatal death.

The ART group also experiences significantly higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section, with postpartum atony occurring 4 times more frequently.

Conclusions: Maternal and neonatal outcomes in ART-conceived DCDA twin pregnancies are markedly worse compared to those conceived spontaneously. The observed disparities underscore the necessity for intensive monitoring and tailored management strategies in ART twin pregnancies. Further research is essential to uncover the mechanisms driving these adverse outcomes.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, et al. Births: Final Data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023; 72(1): 1–53.
  2. Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Derom C, et al. Preterm birth in twins after subfertility treatment: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2005; 331(7526): 1173.
  3. Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2): 252–257.
  4. Beck-Fruchter R, Gavish I, Baram S, et al. Increased coagulation index as measured by Thromboelastography during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: Influence of the final oocyte maturation triggering agent. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 223: 26–29.
  5. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Rehal A, et al. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95(6 Pt 1): 899–904.
  6. Geisler ME, O'Mahony A, Meaney S, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived following IVF/ICSI treatment compared with spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 181: 78–83.
  7. Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217(3): 270–281.
  8. Szymusik I, Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Bomba-Opon D, et al. IVF versus spontaneous twin pregnancies--which are at higher risk of complications? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25(12): 2725–2728.
  9. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(5): 485–503.
  10. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, et al. Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83(1): 75–84.
  11. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(6): e237–e260.
  12. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190 Summary: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131(2): 406–408.
  13. Saccone G, Zullo F, Roman A, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in IVF-conceived twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32(3): 369–376.
  14. Wu FT, Chen YY, Chen CP, et al. Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 59(4): 508–513.
  15. Alemdaroğlu S, Yılmaz Baran Ş, Durdağ GD, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: are fertilization pregnancies at risk? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; 34(15): 2548–2553.
  16. Zhu Y, Xu Le, Beejadhursing R, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy after in vitro fertilization. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1): 44.
  17. Floreani A, Gervasi M. New Insights on Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2016; 20(1): 177–189.
  18. Tsur A, Leonard SA, Kan P, et al. Vaginal progesterone is associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 2023; 40(11): 1158–1162.
  19. Gulersen M, Eliner Y, Grunebaum A, et al. Adverse outcomes associated with twin pregnancies conceived via fertilization. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(25): 10213–10219.
  20. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016; 353: i1753.
  21. Bouthoorn SH, Silva LM, Murray SE, et al. Low-educated women have an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: the Generation R Study. Acta Diabetol. 2015; 52(3): 445–452.
  22. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(1): 73–85.e1.
  23. Liu CN, Yu FB, Xu YZ, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of severe postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 332.
  24. Patek K, Friedman P. Postpartum Hemorrhage-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Causes. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 66(2): 344–356.