Maternal obesity, more than diabetes mellitus, predisposes to soft tissue injuries of the birth canal during vaginal delivery
, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the incidence of birth canal soft tissue injuries, perineal incision procedure and maternal and neonatal characteristics.
Material and methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary hospital analyzing deliveries between July 2018 and January 2019. Study group included 726 spontaneous vaginal singleton births in the longitudinal cephalic fetal position after completed 36th gestational week. Characteristics of patients who suffered from cervical ruptures and/or vaginal injuries were compared to those who gave birth without any soft tissue traumas.
Results: The perineal incision procedure was performed in 561 (77.3%) women. Soft tissue injuries of the birth canal were found in 220 patients (30.3%). Cervical rupture was more frequent when perineal incision was performed (94.5% vs 74.2%, p = 0.0001), but only in primiparous women (70.6% vs 43.2%, p = 0.01). Vaginal injury happened less frequently when perineal incision was performed (56.5% vs 81.8%, p = 0.001), but only in multiparous women (12.9% vs 34.3%, p = 0.001). Vaginal injury was more common in women with higher pre-pregnancy body weight (69.4 vs 65.4 kg, p = 0.0015), higher prepregnancy BMI (24.5 vs 23.5 kg/m2, p = 0.0085), higher body weight and BMI before delivery (82.2 vs 78.1 kg, p = 0.001 and 29.1 vs 28.1 kg/m2, p = 0.008, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis neither parity nor perineal incision increased the risk of vaginal injury. Only the obese women, but not diabetic, were at higher risk of vaginal injury, when perineal incision was performed (OR 2.25, CI 1.25-4.05, p = 0.007).
Conclusions: The obese women are at higher risk of vaginal injury during delivery, when perineal incision is performed. The necessity of maintaining normal body weight while planning pregnancy, monitoring gestational weight gain, and avoiding perineal incision remain important issues.
Keywords: birth canalcervical ruptureobesityperineal incisionvaginal injuryweight gain
References
- Khaskhell M, Baloch S, Baloch A. Obstetrical trauma to the genital tract following vaginal delivery. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012; 22(2): 95–97.
- Albers LL, Borders N. Minimizing genital tract trauma and related pain following spontaneous vaginal birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007; 52(3): 246–253.
- Cakwira H, Mukengere M, Lucien B, et al. The clinical characteristics of perineal tears: A study carried out on 14 pregnant women in a tertiary center: Case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 82: 104432.
- Gueudry P, Cardaillac C, Gauthier S, et al. Pelvic fracture and urogenital dysfunction in women: A literature review. Prog Urol. 2021; 31(17): 1167–1174.
- Mu Yi, Wang X, Wang Y, et al. The trends and associated adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes of labour neuraxial analgesia among vaginal deliveries in China between 2012 and 2019: a real-world observational evidence. BMC Med. 2021; 19(1): 74.
- Zang Yu, Hu Y, Lu H. Effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration: An overview of systematic reviews. J Clin Nurs. 2023; 32(7-8): 996–1013.
- Dietz HP. Quantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator ani. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29(3): 329–334.
- Fernando R. Risk factors and management of obstetric perineal injury. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 2007; 17(8): 238–243.
- Andrews V, Shelmeridine S, Sultan AH, et al. Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24(1): 55–60.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears Green-top Guideline No. 29. [www.rcog.org.uk.] June 2015.
- Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2): CD000224.
- Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983; 38(6): 322–338.
- Aukee P, Sundström H, Kairaluoma MV. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85(7): 856–860.
- M Amorim M, Coutinho IC, Melo I, et al. Selective episiotomy vs. implementation of a non-episiotomy protocol: a randomized clinical trial. Reprod Health. 2017; 14(1): 55.
- McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105(12): 1262–1272.
- Berstein I, Juul N, Gronvall S, et al. Pelvic floor muscle thickness measured by perineal ultrasonography. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1991; 137: 131–133.
- Baghurst PA. The case for retaining severe perineal tears as an indicator of the quality of obstetric care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 53(1): 3–8.
- Malinowska-Polubiec A, Knaś M, Czajkowski K, et al. Obstetric perineal injury. Perinatol Neonatol Ginekol. 2009; 2: 195–202.
- Heit M, Mudd K, Culligan P. Prevention of childbirth injuries to the pelvic floor. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2001; 1: 72–80.
- Stride SL, Hundley VA, Way S, et al. Identifying the factors that influence midwives' perineal practice at the time of birth in the United Kingdom. Midwifery. 2021; 102: 103077.
- Wang H, Jayasekara R, Warland J. The effect of "hands on" techniques on obstetric perineal laceration: A structured review of the literature. Women Birth. 2015; 28(3): 194–198.
- Räisänen S, Cartwright R, Gissler M, et al. Changing associations of episiotomy and anal sphincter injury across risk strata: results of a population-based register study in Finland 2004-2011. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(8): e003216.
- Rodriguez A, Arenas EA, Osorio AL, et al. Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(3): 285.e1–285.e4.
- Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Roussot A, et al. How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 208.
- Gün İ, Doğan B, Özdamar Ö. Long- and short-term complications of episiotomy. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 13(3): 144–148.
- World Health Organization. Division of family Health Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Report of a technical working group Geneva: World Health Organization, 1966.
- Blondel B, Alexander S, Bjarnadóttir RI, et al. Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95(7): 746–754.
- Sadler M, Santos MJ, Ruiz-Berdún D, et al. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters. 2016; 24(47): 47–55.
- Gebuza B, Każmierczak M, Mieczkowska M, et al. Comparison of childbirth perineal and pelvic floor injuries due to referential step of hospital. Poznań University of Medical Sciences. Poland. 2018; 2(55): 173–181.
- Steiner N, Weintraub AY, Wiznitzer A, et al. Episiotomy: the final cut? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(6): 1369–1373.
- Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, et al. Epidural analgesia and third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94(2): 259–262.
- Beckmann MM, Stock OM. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2013(4): CD005123.
- Belihu FB, Small R, Davey MA. Episiotomy and severe perineal trauma among Eastern African immigrant women giving birth in public maternity care: A population based study in Victoria, Australia. Women Birth. 2017; 30(4): 282–290.
- Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Reinar LM, et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 6(6): CD006672.
- Bączek G, Rzońca E, Sys D, et al. Spontaneous perineal trauma during non-operative childbirth-retrospective analysis of perineal laceration risk factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13): 7653.
- Halperin O, Raz I, Ben-Gal L, et al. Prediction of perineal trauma during childbirth by assessment of striae gravidarum score. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010; 39(3): 292–297.
- Khalifa E, El-Sateh A, Zeeneldin M, et al. Effect of maternal BMI on labor outcomes in primigravida pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1): 753.
- Gommesen D, Nohr EAa, Qvist N, et al. Obstetric perineal ruptures-risk of anal incontinence among primiparous women 12 months postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(2): 165.e1–165.e11.
- Durnea CM, Jaffery AE, Gauthaman N, et al. Effect of body mass index on the incidence of perineal trauma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 141(2): 166–170.
- Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 395803.
- Lindholm ES, Altman D. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations among obese women. BJOG. 2013; 120(9): 1110–1115.
- Alberico S, Montico M, Barresi V, et al. Multicentre Study Group on Mode of Delivery in Friuli Venezia Giulia. The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: results from a prospective multicentre study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 23.
