Multimedialna platforma wiedzy medycznej Internetowa Księgarnia Medyczna Kalendarium Konferencji
Gastroenterologia Kliniczna. Postępy i Standardy
MENU
Na skróty Ahead of print Zrealizuj voucher

Tom 13, Nr 1 (2021)
Wytyczne / stanowisko ekspertów
Opublikowany online: 2021-02-25
Dodaj do koszyka: 49,00 PLN
Pobierz cytowanie

Cewnikowanie brodawki dwunastniczej większej oraz techniki sfinkterotomii w ECPW ― wytyczne Europejskiego Towarzystwa Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego (ESGE)

Pier Alberto Testoni, Alberto Mariani, Lars Aabakken, Marianna Arvanitakis, Erwan Bories, Guido Costamagna, Jacques Devière, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Marc Giovannini, Tibor Gyokeres, Michael Hafner, Jorma Halttunen, Cesare Hassan, Luis Lopes, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Tony C. Tham, Andrea Tringali, Jeanin van Hooft, Earl J. Williams
Gastroenterologia Kliniczna 2021;13(1).

dostęp płatny

Tom 13, Nr 1 (2021)
Artykuły
Opublikowany online: 2021-02-25

Streszczenie

Brak

Streszczenie

Brak

Pełny tekst:

Dodaj do koszyka: 49,00 PLN
Pobierz cytowanie
Informacje o artykule
Tytuł

Cewnikowanie brodawki dwunastniczej większej oraz techniki sfinkterotomii w ECPW ― wytyczne Europejskiego Towarzystwa Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego (ESGE)

Czasopismo

Gastroenterologia Kliniczna. Postępy i Standardy

Numer

Tom 13, Nr 1 (2021)

Typ artykułu

Wytyczne / stanowisko ekspertów

Opublikowany online

2021-02-25

Wyświetlenia strony

468

Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu

106

Rekord bibliograficzny

Gastroenterologia Kliniczna 2021;13(1).

Autorzy

Pier Alberto Testoni
Alberto Mariani
Lars Aabakken
Marianna Arvanitakis
Erwan Bories
Guido Costamagna
Jacques Devière
Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Marc Giovannini
Tibor Gyokeres
Michael Hafner
Jorma Halttunen
Cesare Hassan
Luis Lopes
Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
Tony C. Tham
Andrea Tringali
Jeanin van Hooft
Earl J. Williams

Referencje (196)
  1. Tse F, Yuan Y, Bukhari M, et al. Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12(5): CD009662.
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. BSG Audit of ERCP. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut. 2007; 56(6): 821–829.
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Riphaus A, et al. European Society of Gastro- intestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Development Policy. Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 626.
  4. Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE. Guidewirecannulationreducesrisk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 2147–2153.
  5. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, et al. SEIFRED Group. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(8): 1753–1761.
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. Mariani A, Giussani A, Di Leo M, et al. Guidewire biliary cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(2): 339–346.
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - updated June 2014. Endoscopy. 2014; 46(9): 799–815.
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L, et al. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49(6): 752–758.
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(4): 425–434.
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. Friedland S, Soetikno RM, Vandervoort J, et al. Bedside scoring system to predict the risk of developing pancreatitis following ERCP. Endoscopy. 2002; 34(6): 483–488.
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S. Risk factors for pancreatitis follow- ing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2003; 35: 830–834.
  12. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(1): 31–40.
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. Ding X, Zhang F, Wang Y. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2015; 13(4): 218–229.
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, et al. Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65(3): 394–400.
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. Baron T, Petersen B, Mergener K, et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006; 63(4): S29–S34.
    CrossRef
  16. Guda NM, Freeman ML. Are you safe for your patients - how many ERCPs should you be doing? Endoscopy. 2008; 40(8): 675–676.
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007; 39(9): 793–801.
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Bourke MJ, Costamagna G, Freeman ML. Biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: core technique and recent innovations. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(7): 612–617.
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Laasch HU, Tringali A, Wilbraham L, et al. Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(8): 669–674.
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59(7): 830–834.
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. Lee TH, Park DoH, Park JY, et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 1): 444–449.
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T, et al. Japan Bile Duct Cannulation Study Group. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(2): 362–72, 372.e1.
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 2008; 40(4): 302–307.
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2008; 40(4): 296–301.
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. Nambu T, Ukita T, Shigoka H, et al. Wire-guided selective cannulation of the bile duct with a sphincterotome: a prospective randomized comparative study with the standard method. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011; 46(1): 109–115.
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. Kobayashi Go, Fujita N, Imaizumi K, et al. Wire-guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2013; 25(3): 295–302.
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(9): 2343–2350.
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL, et al. Guidewire versus conventional con- trast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post- ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70: 1211.
  29. Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P, et al. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013; 45(8): 605–618.
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. Shao LM, Chen QY, Chen MY, et al. Can wire-guided cannulation reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 24(11): 1710–1715.
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1991; 37(3): 383–393.
    CrossRef
  32. Tarnasky PR. Guidewire cannulation: friend or foe. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76(4): 919–20; author reply 920.
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. Halttunen J, Kylänpää L. A prospective randomized study of thin versus regular-sized guide wire in wire-guided cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(5): 1662–1667.
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. Vihervaara H, Grönroos JM, Koivisto M, et al. Angled- or straight-tipped hydrophilic guidewire in biliary cannulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27(4): 1281–1286.
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Maetani I, et al. Effectiveness of the J-Tip Guidewire for Selective Biliary Cannulation Compared to Conventional Guidewires (The JANGLE Study). Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60(8): 2502–2508.
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. Tanaka R, Itoi T, Sofuni A, et al. Is the double-guidewire technique superior to the pancreatic duct guidewire technique in cases of pancreatic duct opacification? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28(11): 1787–1793.
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Díaz G, et al. UDOGUIA-04 Group. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(4): 700–709.
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W, et al. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(2): 356–361.
    CrossRefPubMed
  39. Coté GA, Mullady DK, Jonnalagadda SS, et al. Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57: 3271 –3278.
  40. Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O, et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy. 2003; 35(9): 721–724.
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. Yoo YW, Cha SW, Lee WC, et al. Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(1): 108–114.
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. Ito K, Horaguchi J, Fujita N, et al. Clinical usefulness of double‐guidewire technique for difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestive Endoscopy. 2013; 26(3): 442–449.
    CrossRef
  43. Lee TH, Hwang SOh, Choi HJ, et al. Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: a prospective clinical study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14: 30.
    CrossRefPubMed
  44. Xinopoulos D, Bassioukas SP, Kypreos D, et al. Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(15): 1989–1995.
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. Nguyen-Tang T, Dumonceau JM. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: why not insert a prophylactic pancreatic stent? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72(2): 466–467.
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, et al. Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol. 2010; 45(11): 1183–1191.
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. Nakahara K, Okuse C, Suetani K, et al. Need for pancreatic stenting after sphincterotomy in patients with difficult cannulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(26): 8617–8623.
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, et al. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17(48): 5289–5294.
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. Lim JUk, Joo KRo, Cha JM, et al. Early use of needle-knife fistulotomy is safe in situations where difficult biliary cannulation is expected. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57(5): 1384–1390.
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. Kaffes AJ, Sriram PVJ, Rao GV, et al. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62(5): 669–674.
    CrossRefPubMed
  51. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010; 42(5): 381–388.
    CrossRefPubMed
  52. Gong B, Hao L, Bie L, et al. Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(11): 2670–2680.
    CrossRefPubMed
  53. Navaneethan U. Early precut sphincterotomy and the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related complications: An updated meta-analysis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2014; 6(5): 200–208.
    CrossRef
  54. Choudhary A, Winn J, Siddique S. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 4093 –4101.
  55. Swan MP, Alexander S, Moss A, et al. Needle knife sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11(4): 430–436.e1.
    CrossRefPubMed
  56. Harewood GC, Baron TH. An assessment of the learning curve for precut biliary sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(7): 1708–1712.
    CrossRefPubMed
  57. Katsinelos P, Mimidis K, Paroutoglou G, et al. Needle-knife papillotomy: a safe and effective technique in experienced hands. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004; 51: 349.
  58. Robison LS, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Safety and success of precut biliary sphincterotomy: Is it linked to experience or expertise. World Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 2183.
  59. Akaraviputh T, Lohsiriwat V, Swangsri J. The learning curve for safety and success of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a single endoscopist’s experience. Endoscopy. 2008; 40: 513.
  60. Fukatsu H, Kawamoto H, Harada R. Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 2066.
  61. Figueiredo FA, Pelosi AD, Machado L, et al. Precut papillotomy: a risky technique not only for experts but also for average endoscopists skilled in ER. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55(1485).
  62. Lee TH, Bang BW, Park SH. Precut fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: is it a risky preference in relation to the experience of an endoscopist? . Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56: 1896.
  63. Sundaralingam P, Masson P, Bourke MJ. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangio- pancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13: 1722 –1729.
  64. Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Early precut fistulotomy for biliary access: time to change the paradigm of "the later, the better"? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80(4): 634–641.
    CrossRefPubMed
  65. Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A, et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50(3): 334–339.
    CrossRefPubMed
  66. Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57(12): 3286–3292.
    CrossRefPubMed
  67. Abu-Hamda EM, Baron TH, Simmons DT, et al. A retrospective comparison of outcomes using three different precut needle knife techniques for biliary cannulation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005; 39(8): 717–721.
    CrossRefPubMed
  68. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 5(9): 1113–1118.
    CrossRefPubMed
  69. Testoni PA, Testoni S, Giussani A. Difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP: how to facilitate biliary access and minimize the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43(8): 596–603.
    CrossRefPubMed
  70. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, et al. SEIFRED Group. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(8): 1753–1761.
    CrossRefPubMed
  71. Kubota K, Sato T, Kato S, et al. Needle-knife precut papillotomy with a small incision over a pancreatic stent improves the success rate and reduces the complication rate in difficult biliary cannulations. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20(3): 382–388.
    CrossRefPubMed
  72. Cha SW, Leung WD, Lehman GA, et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77(2): 209–216.
    CrossRefPubMed
  73. Madácsy L, Kurucsai G, Fejes R, et al. Prophylactic pancreas stenting followed by needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and difficult cannulation: new method to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Dig Endosc. 2009; 21(1): 8–13.
    CrossRefPubMed
  74. Fogel EL, Eversman D, Jamidar P, et al. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: pancreaticobiliary sphincterotomy with pancreatic stent placement has a lower rate of pancreatitis than biliary sphincterotomy alone. Endoscopy. 2002; 34(4): 280–285.
    CrossRefPubMed
  75. Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Randomized trial comparing needle-knife and pull-sphincterotome techniques for pancreatic sphincterotomy in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64(5): 716–722.
    CrossRefPubMed
  76. Lawrence C, Romagnuolo J, Cotton PB, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(7): 1271–1275.
    CrossRefPubMed
  77. Attwell A, Borak G, Hawes R, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64(5): 705–711.
    CrossRefPubMed
  78. Coté GA, Ansstas M, Pawa R, et al. Difficult biliary cannulation: use of physician-controlled wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic duct stent to reduce the rate of precut sphincterotomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71(2): 275–279.
    CrossRefPubMed
  79. Afghani E, Akshintala VS, Khashab MA, et al. 5-Fr vs. 3-Fr pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014; 46(7): 573–580.
    CrossRefPubMed
  80. Goff JS. Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995; 41(5): 502–505.
    CrossRefPubMed
  81. Zang J, Zhang C, Gao J. Guidewire-assisted transpancreatic sphincterotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014; 24(5): 429–433.
    CrossRefPubMed
  82. Cha SW, Kim S, Kim A, et al. 447 DGT vs TPS in patients with initial PD cannulation by chance; prospective randomized multi-center study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2012; 75(4): AB141.
    CrossRef
  83. Catalano M, Linder J, Geenen J. Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2004; 60(4): 557–561.
    CrossRef
  84. Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Mullick T, et al. Prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2(11): 971–977.
    CrossRefPubMed
  85. Lee YJ, Park YK, Lee MJi, et al. Different Strategies for Transpancreatic Septotomy and Needle Knife Infundibulotomy Due to the Presence of Unintended Pancreatic Cannulation in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. Gut Liver. 2015; 9(4): 534–539.
    CrossRefPubMed
  86. Halttunen J, Keränen I, Udd M, et al. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23(4): 745–749.
    CrossRefPubMed
  87. Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57(12): 3286–3292.
    CrossRefPubMed
  88. Wang P, Zhang W, Liu F, et al. Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14(4): 697–704.
    CrossRefPubMed
  89. Kohler A, Maier M, Benz C, et al. A new HF current generator with automatically controlled system (Endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy--preliminary experience. Endoscopy. 1998; 30(4): 351–355.
    CrossRefPubMed
  90. Akiho H, Sumida Y, Akahoshi K, et al. Safety advantage of endocut mode over endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12(13): 2086–2088.
    CrossRefPubMed
  91. Perini RF, Sadurski R, Cotton PB, et al. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61(1): 53–57.
    CrossRefPubMed
  92. Tanaka Y, Sato K, Tsuchida H, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study of endoscopic sphincterotomy with the Endocut mode or conventional blended cut mode. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015; 49(2): 127–131.
    CrossRefPubMed
  93. Parlak E, Köksal AŞ, Öztaş E, et al. Is there a safer electrosurgical current for endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with liver cirrhosis? Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016; 128(15-16): 573–578.
    CrossRefPubMed
  94. Stefanidis G, Karamanolis G, Viazis N, et al. A comparative study of postendoscopic sphincterotomy complications with various types of electrosurgical current in patients with choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57(2): 192–197.
    CrossRefPubMed
  95. Elta GH, Barnett JL, Wille RT, et al. Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy causes less post-procedure pancreatitis than blended current. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47(2): 149–153.
    CrossRefPubMed
  96. MacIntosh D, Love J, Abraham N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy by using pure-cut electrosurgical current and the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2004; 60(4): 551–556.
    CrossRef
  97. Norton I, Petersen B, Bosco J, et al. A Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy Using Pure-Cut Versus Combined Cut and Coagulation Waveforms. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2005; 3(10): 1029–1033.
    CrossRef
  98. Gorelick A, Cannon M, Barnett J, et al. First cut, then blend: an electrocautery technique affecting bleeding at sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 2001; 33(11): 976–980.
    CrossRefPubMed
  99. Verma D, Kapadia A, Adler D. Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2007; 65(5): AB237.
    CrossRef
  100. Liao WC, Tu YK, Wu MS. Balloon dilation with adequate duration is safer than sphincterotomy for extracting bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10: 1101–1109.
  101. Liu Y, Su P, Lin S, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(3): 464–471.
    CrossRefPubMed
  102. Zhao HC, He L, Zhou DC, et al. Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(24): 3883–3891.
    CrossRefPubMed
  103. Liao WC, Lee CT, Chang CY. Randomized trial of 1-minute ver- sus pięciominute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 72: 1154.
  104. Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Inoue Y, et al. Preserved function of the Oddi sphincter after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003; 50(54): 1787–1791.
    PubMed
  105. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127(5): 1291–1299.
    CrossRefPubMed
  106. Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A pro- spective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest En- dosc. 2003; 57: 151.
  107. Seo YuRi, Moon JHo, Choi HJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and sphincterotomy in young patients with CBD stones and gallstones. Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59(5): 1042–1047.
    CrossRefPubMed
  108. Oh MJ, Kim TN. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papil- lary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for re- moval of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47: 1071.
  109. Lin CK, Lai KH, Chan HH, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis. 2004; 36(1): 68–72.
    CrossRefPubMed
  110. Vlavianos P, Chopra K, Mandalia S, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial. Gut. 2003; 52(8): 1165–1169.
    CrossRefPubMed
  111. Minakari M, Samani RR, Shavakhi A, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation in comparison with endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of large common bile duct stone. Adv Biomed Res. 2013; 2: 46.
    CrossRefPubMed
  112. Arnold JC, Benz C, Martin WR, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study. Endoscopy. 2001; 33: 563.
  113. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bi- leduct stones. Lancet. 1997; 349: 1124–1129.
  114. Minami A, Nakatsu T, Uchida N, et al. Papillary dilation vs sphincterot- omy in endoscopic removal of bile duct stones. A randomized trial with manometric function. Dig Dis Sci. 1995; 40: 2550.
  115. Natsui M, Narisawa R, Motoyama H, et al. What is an appropriate indi- cation for endoscopic papillary balloon dilation? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002; 14: 635–640.
  116. Ochi Y, Mukawa K, Kiyosawa K, et al. Comparing the treatment outcomes of endoscopic papillary dilation and endoscopic sphincterot- omy for removal of bile duct stones. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 14: 90–96.
  117. Tanaka S, Sawayama T, Yoshioka T. Endoscopic papillary balloon dila- tion and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 59: 614–618.
  118. Yasuda I, Tomita E, Enya M, et al. Can endoscopic papillary balloon di- lation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function? Gut. 2001; 49: 686.
  119. Aiura K, Kitagawa Y. Current status of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of bile duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011; 18(3): 339–345.
    CrossRefPubMed
  120. Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for remov- al of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of ran- domized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 1455–1460.
  121. Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(4): CD004890.
    CrossRefPubMed
  122. Mac Mathuna P, Siegenberg D, Gibbons D, et al. The acute and long-term effect of balloon sphincteroplasty on papillary structure in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44(6): 650–655.
    CrossRefPubMed
  123. Natsui M, Saito Y, Abe S, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic pap- illary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Dig Endosc. 2013; 25: 313–321.
  124. Doi S, Yasuda I, Mukai T, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48(9): 1090–1096.
    CrossRefPubMed
  125. Akbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-in- flammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in prevent- ing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11: 778 –783.
  126. Aizawa T, Ueno N. Stent placement in the pancreatic duct prevents pancreatitis after endoscopic sphincter dilation for removal of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(2): 209–213.
    CrossRefPubMed
  127. Delhaye M, Matos C, Devière J. Endoscopic management of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003; 13: 717–742.
  128. Bakman Y, Freeman M. Update on biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2012; 28(5): 420–426.
    CrossRef
  129. Buscaglia JM, Kalloo AN. Pancreatic sphincterotomy: technique, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13(30): 4064–4071.
    CrossRefPubMed
  130. Brugge WR. Endoscopic approach to the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013; 29(5): 559–565.
    CrossRefPubMed
  131. Cotton P, Durkalski V, Romagnuolo J, et al. Effect of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Suspected Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction on Pain-Related Disability Following Cholecystectomy. JAMA. 2014; 311(20): 2101–2109.
    CrossRef
  132. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy: indications, technique, and analysis of results. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994; 40(5): 592–598.
    CrossRefPubMed
  133. Cremer M, Devière J, Delhaye M, et al. Stenting in Severe Chronic Pancreatitis: Results of Medium-Term Follow-Up in Seventy-Six Patients. Endoscopy. 2008; 23(03): 171–176.
    CrossRef
  134. Kim MH, Myung SJ, Kim YS, et al. Routine biliary sphincterotomy may not be indispensable for endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 1998; 30(8): 697–701.
    CrossRefPubMed
  135. Jakobs R, Riemann JF. Is there a Need for Dual Sphincterotomy in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis? Endoscopy. 2003; 35(3): 250–251.
    CrossRef
  136. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Ananos F. Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006; 16: 208.
  137. Egawa N, Anjiki H, Takuma K, et al. Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and pancreatobiliary disease. Dig Surg. 2010; 27(2): 105–109.
    CrossRefPubMed
  138. Cappell MS, Mogrovejo E, Manickam P, et al. Endoclips to facilitate cannulation and sphincterotomy during ERCP in a patient with an ampulla within a large duodenal diverticulum: case report and literature review. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60: 168.
  139. Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Increased selective biliary cannula- tion rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47: 396.
  140. Park CSu, Park CH, Koh HRa, et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with periampullary diverticula and difficult bile duct cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(9): 1480–1483.
    CrossRefPubMed
  141. Myung DS, Park CH, Koh HR, et al. Cap-assisted ERCP in patients with difficult cannulation due to periampullary diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2014; 46(4): 352–355.
    CrossRefPubMed
  142. Vaira D, Dowsett JF, Hatfield AR, et al. Is duodenal diverticulum a risk factor for sphincterotomy? Gut. 1989; 30(7): 939–942.
    CrossRefPubMed
  143. Tham TC, Kelly M. Association of periampullary duodenal diverticula with bile duct stones and with technical success of endoscopic retro- grade cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 2004; 36: 1050–1053.
  144. Liao WC, Huang SP, Wu MS, et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and sphincterotomy for lithotripsy in difficult sphincterotomy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42(3): 295–299.
    CrossRefPubMed
  145. Kim HW, Kang DH, Choi CW, et al. Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis with periampullary diverticula. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16(34): 4335–4340.
    CrossRefPubMed
  146. Kim KY, Han J, Kim HG, et al. Late complications and stone recurrence rates after bile duct stone removal by endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation are similar to those after endoscopic sphincterectomy alone. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46: 637–642.
  147. Kirk AP, Summerfield JA. Incidence and significance of juxtapapillary diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion. 1980; 20(1): 31–35.
    CrossRefPubMed
  148. Chang-Chien CS. Do juxtapapillary diverticula of the duodenum inter- fere with cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987; 33: 298–300.
  149. Katsinelos P, Chatzimavroudis G, Tziomalos K, et al. Impact of periam- pullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endo- scopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013; 12: 408–414.
  150. Panteris V, Vezakis A, Filippou G, et al. Influence of juxtapapillary diverticula on the success or difficulty of cannulation and complication rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68(5): 903–910.
    CrossRefPubMed
  151. Tyagi P, Sharma P, Sharma BC, et al. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 1342–1345.
  152. Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Afzali ES, Shahnazi A, et al. ERCP features and outcome in patients with periampullary duodenal diverticulum. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2013; 2013: 217261.
    CrossRefPubMed
  153. Balik E, Eren T, Keskin M, et al. Parameters that may be used for predicting failure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Oncol. 2013; 2013: 201681.
    CrossRefPubMed
  154. Williams EJ, Ogollah R, Thomas P, et al. What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis . Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 674.
  155. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2007; 39(9): 793–801.
    CrossRefPubMed
  156. Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(1): 31–40.
    CrossRefPubMed
  157. DiMagno MJ, Wamsteker EJ. Pancreas divisum. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011; 13: 150 –156.
  158. Fogel EL, Toth TG, Lehman GA, et al. Does endoscopic therapy favorably affect the outcome of patients who have recurrent acute pancreatitis and pancreas divisum? Pancreas. 2007; 34(1): 21–45.
    CrossRefPubMed
  159. Devereaux BM, Fein S, Purich E, et al. A new synthetic porcine secretin for facilitation of cannulation of the dorsal pancreatic duct at ERCP in patients with pancreas divisum: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57(6): 643–647.
    CrossRefPubMed
  160. Park SH, de Bellis M, McHenry L, et al. Use of methylene blue to identify the minor papilla or its orifice in patients with pancreas divisum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57(3): 358–363.
    CrossRefPubMed
  161. Cai Q, Keilin S, Obideen K, et al. Intraduodenal hydrochloric acid infu- sion for facilitation of cannulation of the dorsal pancreatic duct at ERCP in patients with pancreas divisum: a preliminary study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1450.
  162. Alazmi WM, Mosler P, Watkins JL, et al. Predicting pancreas divisum by inspection of the minor papilla: a prospective study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007; 41(4): 422–426.
    CrossRefPubMed
  163. Lawrence C, Stefan AM, Howell DA. Endoscopic appearance of the mi- nor papilla predicts findings at pancreatography. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55: 2412–2416.
  164. Matos C, Metens T, Devière J, et al. Pancreas divisum: evaluation with secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53(7): 728–733.
    CrossRefPubMed
  165. Attwell A, Borak G, Hawes R, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64(5): 705–711.
    CrossRefPubMed
  166. Maple JT, Keswani RN, Edmundowicz SA, et al. Wire-assisted access sphincterotomy of the minor papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(1): 47–54.
    CrossRefPubMed
  167. Yamamoto N, Isayama H, Sasahira N, et al. Endoscopic minor papilla balloon dilation for the treatment of symptomatic pancreas divisum. Pancreas. 2014; 43(6): 927–930.
    CrossRefPubMed
  168. Basso N, Pizzuto G, Surgo D, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of chole- cysto-choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50: 532–535.
  169. Nakajima H, Okubo H, Masuko Y, et al. Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 1996; 28(2): 264.
    CrossRefPubMed
  170. Lella F, Bagnolo F, Rebuffat C, et al. Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called “rendez-vous” technique, in cholecystochole- docholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk fac- tors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 419–423.
  171. Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Zachari E, et al. Laparoendoscopic rendez- vous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: interim anal- ysis of a controlled randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 435.
  172. Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, et al. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendez-vous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 889.
  173. Rábago LR, Vicente C, Soler F, et al. Two-stage treatment with preo- perative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholi- thiasis. Endoscopy. 2006; 38: 779.
  174. El Ge, ElEbidy GK, Naeem YM. Preoperative versus intraopera- tive endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25: 1230–1237.
  175. Wang B, Guo Z, Liu Z, et al. Preoperative versus intraoperative endo- scopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis. Surg En- dosc. 2013; 27: 2454.
  176. Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Famiglietti F, et al. Laparoendoscopic rendez- vous reduces perioperative morbidity and risk of pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27: 1055–1060.
  177. Gurusamy K, Sahay SJ, Burroughs AK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 2011; 98(7): 908–916.
    CrossRefPubMed
  178. Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive techniques for the management of cholecysto- choledocholithiasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21: 896 – 901 Leng J-J, 179 Zhang N, Dong J-H. Percutaneous transhepatic and endo- scopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014; 12: 272.
  179. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(26): 8424–8448.
    CrossRefPubMed
  180. Gupta K, Perez-Miranda M, Kahaleh M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted bile duct access and drainage: multicenter, long-term analysis of approach, outcomes, and complications of a technique in evolu- tion. J. Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 48: 80–87.
  181. Artifon ELA, Aparicio D, Paione JB, et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endo- scopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012; 46: 768.
  182. Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E, et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60(2): 557–565.
    CrossRefPubMed
  183. Bapaye A, Dubale N, Aher A. Comparison of endosonography-guided vs. percutaneous biliary stenting when papilla is inaccessible for ERCP. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013; 1(4): 285–293.
    CrossRefPubMed
  184. Dhir V, Itoi T, Khashab MA, et al. Multicenter comparative evaluation of endoscopic placement of expandable metal stents for malignant distal common bile duct obstruction by ERCP or EUS-guided approach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(4): 913–923.
    CrossRefPubMed
  185. Kim MH, Lee SK, Lee MH, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan- creatography and needle-knife sphincterotomy in patients with Bill- roth II gastrectomy: a comparative study of the forward-viewing en- doscope and the side-viewing duodenoscope. Endoscopy. 1997; 29: 82–85.
  186. Lin LF, Siauw CP, Ho KS, et al. ERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy pa- tients: emphasis on technique. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 144–148.
  187. Aabakken L, Holthe B, Sandstad O, et al. Endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures in patients with a Billroth II resection: a 10-year follow-up study. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998; 30(3): 301–305.
    PubMed
  188. Hintze RE, Veltzke W, Adler A, et al. Endoscopic access to the papilla of Vater for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with billroth II or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy. Endoscopy. 1997; 29(2): 69–73.
    CrossRefPubMed
  189. Ciçek B, Parlak E, Dişibeyaz S, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Billroth II gastroenterostomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22(8): 1210–1213.
    CrossRefPubMed
  190. Bove V, Tringali A, Familiari P, et al. ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy: report of 30 years' experience. Endoscopy. 2015; 47(7): 611–616.
    CrossRefPubMed
  191. Jang HW, Lee KJ, Jung MJ. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dila- tation alone is safe and effective for the treatment of difficult chole- docholithiasis in cases of Billroth II gastrectomy: a single center experience. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58: 1737–1743.
  192. Cheng CL, Liu NJ, Tang JH, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy for ERCP in patients with Billroth II anatomy: results of a large series of papillary large-balloon dilation for biliary stone removal. Endosc Int Open. 2015; 3(3): E216–E222.
    CrossRefPubMed
  193. Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M, et al. Effective "short" double-balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy. 2009; 41(10): 849–854.
    CrossRefPubMed
  194. Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, et al. Large balloon dilatation following endoscopic sphincterotomy using a balloon enteroscope for the bile duct stone extractions in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43(3): 237–241.
    CrossRefPubMed
  195. Moreels TG. Altered anatomy: enteroscopy and ERCP procedure. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2012; 26(3): 347–357.
    CrossRefPubMed
  196. Skinner M, Popa D, Neumann H, et al. ERCP with the overtube-assisted enteroscopy technique: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2014; 46(7): 560–572.
    CrossRefPubMed

Regulamin

Ważne: serwis https://journals.viamedica.pl/ wykorzystuje pliki cookies. Więcej >>

Używamy informacji zapisanych za pomocą plików cookies m.in. w celach statystycznych, dostosowania serwisu do potrzeb użytkownika (np. język interfejsu) i do obsługi logowania użytkowników. W ustawieniach przeglądarki internetowej można zmienić opcje dotyczące cookies. Korzystanie z serwisu bez zmiany ustawień dotyczących cookies oznacza, że będą one zapisane w pamięci komputera. Więcej informacji można znaleźć w naszej Polityce prywatności.

Czym są i do czego służą pliki cookie możesz dowiedzieć się na stronie wszystkoociasteczkach.pl.

Czasopismo Gastroenterologia Kliniczna. Postępy i Standardy dostęne jest również w Ikamed - księgarnia medyczna

 

Wydawcą serwisu jest  VM Media Group sp. z o.o, Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl