Tom 12, Nr 2 (2020)
Artykuły
Opublikowany online: 2020-10-02
Wyświetlenia strony
881
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu
109
Nowoczesny preparat do przygotowania do kolonoskopii ― mała dawka, dobry smak, brak piany i wysoka skuteczność
Gastroenterologia Kliniczna 2020;12(2):74-79.
Streszczenie
W artykule omówiono aktualne schematy przygotowania jelita grubego do kolonoskopii w świetle ostatnich dowodów naukowych i dyskutuje rolę nowego, nisko objętościowego preparatu z simetikonem.
Słowa kluczowe: kolonoskopiaprzygotowanieoczyszczeniesimetikonglikol polietylenowy
Referencje
- Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(8): 687–696.
- Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017; 49(4): 378–397.
- Rex D, Schoenfeld P, Cohen J, et al. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015; 110(1): 72–90.
- Sulz MC, Kröger A, Prakash M, et al. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6): e0154149.
- Sherer EA, Imler TD, Imperiale TF. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(3): 545–553.
- Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(6): 1197–1203.
- Hsu CM, Lin WP, Su MY, et al. Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27(1): 76–80.
- Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(4): 721–731.
- Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019; 51(8): 775–794.
- vRex DK, Imperiale TF, Latinowich DR, et al. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(7): 1696–1700.
- Lai E, Doros G, Fix O, et al. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2007; 65(5): AB361.
- Bucci C, Rotondano G, Rea M, et al. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointestinal Endosc . 2013; 77(5): AB133.
- Spadaccini M, Frazzoni L, Vanella G, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of High- vs Low-Volume Split-Dose Bowel Cleansing Regimens for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(7): 1454–1465.e14.
- Matro R, Tupchong K, Daskalakis C, et al. The effect on colon visualization during colonoscopy of the addition of simethicone to polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution: a randomized single-blind study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2012; 3: e26.
- Taveira F., e.a., Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS) – Validation study. In Press, 2020.
- Devereaux BM, Taylor ACF, Athan E, et al. Simethicone use during gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position statement of the Gastroenterological Society of Australia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34(12): 2086–2089.
- Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(24): 3032–3037.
- Fardy J, Sullivan S. Gastrointestinal gas. CMAJ. 1988; 139(12): 1137–1142.
- Pan P, Zhao SB, Li BH, et al. Effect of supplemental simethicone for bowel preparation on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34(2): 314–320.
- Yoo InK, Jeen YT, Kang SH, et al. Improving of bowel cleansing effect for polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid using simethicone: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(28): e4163.
- Spada C, Cesaro P, Bazzoli F, et al. Evaluation of Clensia, a new low-volume PEG bowel preparation in colonoscopy: Multicentre randomized controlled trial versus 4L PEG. Dig Liver Dis. 2017; 49(6): 651–656.
- Kump P, Hassan C, Spada C, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new low-volume PEG with citrate and simethicone bowel preparation for colonoscopy (Clensia): a multicenter randomized observer-blind clinical trial vs. a low-volume PEG with ascorbic acid (PEG-ASC). Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6(8): E907–E913.
- Ofstead CL, Wetzler HP, Johnson EA, et al. Simethicone residue remains inside gastrointestinal endoscopes despite reprocessing. Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44(11): 1237–1240.
- Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R, et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018. Endoscopy. 2018; 50(12): 1205–1234.
