Online first
Case report
Published online: 2024-10-25

open access

Page views 137
Article views/downloads 71
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Pemphigus vulgaris mimicking nose tumor

Magdalena Badziąg1, Martyna Kłossowska1, Anna Zaryczańska2, Ewa Grzybek-Duda3, Izabela Karamon2, Roman Nowicki2

Abstract

Introduction: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune bullous dermatosis. PV clinical presentation is characterized by painful blisters, and skin and mucous membranes erosions. The first symptoms of PV are localized mainly in mucous, followed by the appearance of skin lesions several weeks later. Pemphigus localized as an isolated skin nasal lesion, without any prior mucosal involvement occurs rarely.

Case report: A 55-year-old patient was admitted to the Dermatology Department with the suspicion of pemphigus disease. The patient underwent the excision of a nasal tumor at the Department of Plastic Surgery a month earlier, but the lesion started to reappear. Initially, the histopathological examination suggested a diagnosis of acantholytic acanthoma, removed completely, but further diagnostics at the Dermatology Department confirmed the presence of PV. The patient was treated initially with a corticosteroid course and one month after rituximab administration was added, achieving good clinical response and tolerance.

Conclusions: The cases of localized pemphigus vulgaris, without mucosal involvement may cause diagnostic difficulties. The differential diagnosis should consider both the results of the ELISA test and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) examination to avoid misdiagnosis.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Costan VV, Popa C, Hâncu MF, et al. Comprehensive review on the pathophysiology, clinical variants and management of pemphigus (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021; 22(5): 1335.
  2. Kowalewski C, Dmochowski M, Placek W, et al. Diagnosis and therapy of pemphigus – consensus of Polish Dermatological Society. Derm Rev. 2014; 2: 147–155.
  3. Safadi MG, Turowski M, Murray T, et al. Pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus localized to the nose: report of 2 cases. JAAD Case Rep. 2021; 15: 129–132.
  4. Baykal C. Pemphigus vulgaris localized to the nose and cheeks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 47(6): 875–880.
  5. Dmochowski M, Jałowska M, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M. Issues occupying our minds: Nomenclature of autoimmune blistering diseases requires updating, pemphigus vulgaris propensity to affect areas adjacent to natural body orifices unifies seemingly diverse clinical features of this disease. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 1103375.
  6. Amer H, Botros MF, Abdo, I, et al. Acatholytic acanthoma. http://www.edoj.org.eg/vol001/00101/08/8.html (23.08.2024).
  7. Ko CJ, Barr RJ, Subtil A, et al. Acantholytic dyskeratotic acanthoma: a variant of a benign keratosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2008; 35(3): 298–301.
  8. Jałowska M, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Spałek M, et al. Pemphigus foliaceus in an elderly woman: advantages and limitations of histopathology in pemphigus. Derm Rev. 2023; 110(6): 689–693.
  9. Fischer K. Przeciwciała swoiste dla zapalenia skórno-mięśniowego (DM). http://www.mp.pl/social/article/229694 (23.08.2024).
  10. Pacheco M, Ferreira H, Silva C, et al. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-mi-2-alpha positive dermatomyositis hinting a cancer diagnosis. Cureus. 2022; 14(2): e21844.
  11. Arnaud L, Mertz P, Gavand PE, et al. Drug-induced systemic lupus: revisiting the ever-changing spectrum of the disease using the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78(4): 504–508.
  12. Black M, Marshman G. Dermatomyositis and pemphigus vulgaris: association or coincidence? Australas J Dermatol. 2011; 52(2): e11–e14.
  13. Patsatsi A, Pearson DR, Werth VP. Dermatomyositis in patients with autoimmune blistering diseases. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019; 5(4): 256–260.
  14. de Vries JM, Moody P, Ojha A, et al. A recalcitrant case of Senear-Usher syndrome treated with rituximab. Cureus. 2023; 15(10): e46910.
  15. Frampton JE. Rituximab: a review in pemphigus vulgaris. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020; 21(1): 149–156.