Online first
Original article
Published online: 2023-07-26

open access

Page views 280
Article views/downloads 226
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Hepatic arterial variations detected at multidetector computer tomography angiography in the Romanian population

Laura Andreea Bolintineanu Ghenciu12, Sorin Lucian Bolintineanu2, Roxana Iacob3, Emil Robert Stoicescu34, Delia Elena Zahoi2

Abstract

Background: Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of normal hepatic vascularization and variations of the hepatic arteries using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography. These variants should be known before any surgery of the upper abdomen, the downside being that there aren't many studies on large groups of patients using high-specialized imaging.

Materials and methods: This study was carried out on 4192 patients. We performed MDCT angiography on each one of the patients and had a specialized team observe the images.

Results: Using Michels' classification, the normal anatomy (type I) was present in 3392 (80.91%) cases, while abnormal hepatic arteries were observed in 800 (19.08%) cases. The variations were distributed as follows: type II in 40 (0.95%) cases, type III in 442 (10.54%) cases, type IV in 13 (0.31%) cases, type V in 285 (6.79%) cases, type VI in 12 (0.28%) cases, type VII in 3 (0.07%) cases, type VIII in 108 (2.57%) cases, type IX in 6 (0.14%) cases and type X in one case (0.02%). 170 (4.05%) unclassified cases were observed. Using Hiatt’s classification, the variations were: type II in 325 (7.75%) cases, type III in 454 (10.83%) cases, type IV in 124 (2.95%) cases, type V in 6 cases (0.14%) and type VI in 69 (1.64%) cases. 102 (2.43%) unclassified cases were observed.

Conclusions: We observed well-known variations of the hepatic arterial pattern and also found a large number of rare, unclassified cases.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Cankal F, Kaya M, Guner MA. Evaluation of celiac trunk, hepatic artery variations, and their collateral arteries by multi-slice computed tomography. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021; 55(2): 217–223.
  2. Chen CY, Lee RC, Tseng HS, et al. Normal and variant anatomy of hepatic arteries: angiographic experience. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1998; 61(1): 17–23.
  3. Choi TW, Chung JW, Kim HC, et al. Anatomic variations of the hepatic artery in 5625 patients. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 3(4): e210007.
  4. Coco D, Leanza S. Celiac trunk and hepatic artery variants in pancreatic and liver resection anatomy and implications in surgical practice. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(15): 2563–2568.
  5. Fonseca-Neto OC, Lima HC, Rabelo P, et al. Anatomic variations of hepatic artery: a study in 479 liver transplantations. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017; 30(1): 35–37.
  6. Gümüs H, Bükte Y, Özdemir E, et al. Variations of the celiac trunk and hepatic arteries: a study with 64-detector computed tomographic angiography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013; 17(12): 1636–1641.
  7. Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg. 1994; 220(1): 50–52.
  8. Iacob N, Pusztai AM, Miclăuş GD, et al. An anomalous origin of the gastrosplenic trunk and common hepatic artery arising independently from the abdominal aorta: a case report using MDCT angiography. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018; 59(1): 353–357.
  9. Koops A, Wojciechowski B, Broering DC, et al. Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 604 selective celiac and superior mesenteric angiographies. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004; 26(3): 239–244.
  10. Malviya KK, Verma A, Nayak AK, et al. Unraveling variations in celiac trunk and hepatic artery by CT angiography to aid in surgeries of upper abdominal region. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(12).
  11. Megally H, Badran Y, Abdelal S, et al. Role of MDCT angiography in assessment of vascular variant in potential living liver donor transplantation. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2013; 44(4): 713–718.
  12. Michels NA. Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg. 1966; 112(3): 337–347.
  13. Morita M. Reports and conception of three anomalous cases in the area of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Igaku Kenkyu. 1935; 9: 159–172.
  14. Noussios G, Dimitriou I, Chatzis I, et al. The main anatomic variations of the hepatic artery and their importance in surgical practice: review of the literature. J Clin Med Res. 2017; 9(4): 248–252.
  15. Roma S, D'Amato D, Ranalli T, et al. Vascular anomalies of the celiac trunk and implications in treatment of HCC with TACE. Description of a case and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep. 2019; 14(10): 1221–1227.
  16. Song SY, Chung JW, Yin YHu, et al. Celiac axis and common hepatic artery variations in 5002 patients: systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. Radiology. 2010; 255(1): 278–288.
  17. Sureka B, Mittal MK, Mittal A, et al. Variations of celiac axis, common hepatic artery and its branches in 600 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013; 23(3): 223–233.
  18. Thangarajah A, Parthasarathy R. Celiac axis, common hepatic and hepatic artery variants as evidenced on MDCT angiography in South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(1): TC01–TC05.
  19. Yang SH, Yin YHu, Jang JY, et al. Assessment of hepatic arterial anatomy in keeping with preservation of the vasculature while performing pancreatoduodenectomy: an opinion. World J Surg. 2007; 31(12): 2384–2391.
  20. Zaki SM, Abdelmaksoud AHK, Khaled BEA, et al. Anatomical variations of hepatic artery using the multidetector computed tomography angiography. Folia Morphol. 2020; 79(2): 247–254.
  21. Zimmitti G, Manzoni A, Codignola C, et al. How to deal with replaced common hepatic artery during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Med Res. 2019; 2: 4–4.