CASE REPORT

Folia Morphol.

Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 434–438

DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2022.0016

Copyright © 2023 Via Medica

ISSN 0015–5659

eISSN 1644–3284

journals.viamedica.pl

A unilateral sternopharyngeal branch of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in an aged Caucasian male: a unique cadaveric report

S. SilawalS. MorganL. RueckerG. Schulze-Tanzil
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg and Salzburg, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany

[Received: 6 December 2021; Accepted: 12 January 2022; Early publication date: 17 February 2022]

The sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) consists of a sternal and a clavicular head which merge together and inserts distally posterolateral on the mastoid process and superior nuchal line, hence separating the anterior from the posterior triangle of the neck. Many types of structural variations in SCM have already been reported before. A unique variation of this muscle was discovered in an aged Caucasian male cadaver during an anatomical dissection at the Paracelsus Medical University in Nuremberg, Germany.
This study reports a right unilateral accessory muscular branch at the sternal head of the SCM which formed a tendon on the level of omohyoid muscle before dividing into anterior and posterior fascicles. The posterior fascicle attached to the external carotid artery at the site where a common trunk for lingual and facial artery branched off, drawing external carotid artery inferiorly to build an inferior loop, whereas the anterior fascicle passed further superior and broadened to form a muscular belly. This superior muscular belly extended to the posterior and lateral side of the pharynx to ultimately merge into the superior constrictor pharyngeal muscle. Such anatomical variation has never been reported before.
Therefore, we propose the nomenclature of this variational structure as a sternopharyngeal branch of the SCM. This report helps not only to inform the clinicians regarding the possible variation of this muscle during surgical procedures or radiological diagnostics but also encourage developmental researches in the future. (Folia Morphol 2023; 82, 2: 434–438)
Key words: sternopharyngeal, sternocleidomastoid, sternocervical, variation

Address for correspondence: Dr. med. S. Silawal, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg and Nuremberg, Prof. Ernst Nathan Str. 1, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany, tel:+49 – (0)911-398-116771, fax: +49 – (0)911-398-6774, e-mail: sandeep.silawal@pmu.ac.at; sandeep.silawal@klinikum-nuernberg.de

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

INTRODUCTION

The sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) borders anteriorly the posterior triangle of the neck and limits the anterior triangle of the neck posteriorly. As per the anatomical literature, this muscle consists of a sternal and a clavicular head which merge together and attaches posterolateral to the mastoid process and the superior nuchal line. Structures like spinal accessory nerve, branches of the cervical plexus, roots and trunks of the brachial plexus, phrenic nerve, subclavian artery, transverse cervical artery, external jugular vein, inferior belly of the omohyoid, scalene muscles, splenius muscle, levator scapulae muscle, occipital supraclavicular lymph nodes etc. lie in a close proximity posterior to the SCM. Submental, submandibular, superior and inferior carotid triangles are the regions in the anterior triangle of the neck. Common carotid artery, branches of the external carotid artery (ECA), the internal jugular vein, vagus nerve, branches of the ansa cervicalis are some of the examples of vital structures that are located in this triangle anterior to the SCM [11]. Anatomical variations of SCM could impact on above neighbouring structures via compression or narrowing of the surrounding space. Also, understanding the relevance of such variations is very important during surgical interventions in the neck area such as neck dissection. Various anomalies in the proximal heads of SCM have been described before [1–4, 6–10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23]. During the developmental process of the shoulder girdle musculature, SCM and trapezoid muscles derive from the lateral plate mesoderm as a common embryonic source [19, 25]. The splitting of the embryological common trapezius-sternocleidomastoideus muscle system leads to two individual muscles of the neck, where they still share the common innervation of the accessory nerve [5]. This process of separation could result in different forms of muscle variations. Even though the variations in the proximal head are reportedly commonly, the variations described in the insertional end are not that common [13, 24]. A particular muscular variation, the so called cleidocervical or levator claviculae muscle shows that the muscle is attached proximally to the clavicle and distally to different levels of the cervical vertebra [17]. Our study reports a special variation of the SCM where a muscular branch from the sternal side finds non-osseous attachment sites which makes the case report unique.

CASE REPORT

During an anatomical dissection class at the Paracelsus Medical University, we discovered a 0.3 cm thick (maximum thickness) accessory muscular branch of the sternal head of the right SCM in a formalin-fixed 102-year-old Caucasian male (Fig. 1A). The cadavers are registered in the Munich body donation programme and contains written consents of the body donors. This inferior muscular belly deviated medially towards the carotid triangle. 6.5 cm distal from the sternal end, on the level of the crossing of the omohyoid muscle, the tendon of this muscle was divided into anterior and posterior fascicles (Fig. 1A–C). The posterior fascicle was attached to the ECA (Fig. 1B, C). The insertion of this fascicle was located at a site where a common trunk for lingual and facial artery (cLA/FA) was branched from the ECA (Fig. 1B, C). Grade I kinking of the internal carotid artery was observed (Fig. 1B, C) [14]. The anterior fascicle passed further superior in front of cLA/FA before it broadened to form a superior muscular belly (Fig. 1B–D; #). This muscular belly then passed towards the posterior and lateral side of the pharynx to ultimately merge into the superior constrictor pharyngeal muscle (Fig. 1D). Glossopharyngeal nerve pierced the superior muscular belly at the narrow proximal section before it made a loop towards anterior (Fig. 1D). In comparison, the corresponding left side of the neck was void of this sternopharyngeal muscular variation (Fig. 2).

Figure 1. A–D. Chronological stages of dissections of the neck. The digastric sternopharyngeal muscle branch (*) of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) along the sternal head and the division into anterior and posterior tendinous fascicles. The anterior fascicle continues to form a superior muscular belly (#); A. Anterolateral view of the neck. The sternal head of the SCM has been detached and moved to the lateral side. The proximal end of the sternohyoid muscle (SHM) has been folded towards the lateral side; B. Lateral view of the neck. The facial vein has been removed. The musculotendinous junction of the sternopharyngeal muscular branch held by forceps with a light pull inferiorly to develop strain in the two tendinous fascicles; C. Closer view of the superior carotid triangle. The distal part of the external carotid artery (ECA) has been folded lightly towards the lateral side to show the superior muscular belly (#); D. Retropharyngeal view of the right lateral side. Insertion of the superior muscular belly (#) of the sternopharyngeal muscle to form part of the superior constrictor pharyngeal muscle. The muscle pierced by the glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN); CCA — common carotid artery; Cl — clavicle; cLA/FA — common branch of lingual and facial artery; DM — digastric muscle; FA — facial artery; Fm — foramen magnum; GH — greater horn of the hyoid bone; HN — hypoglossal nerve; ICA — internal carotid artery; IJV — internal jugular vein; OHM — omohyoid muscle; Ph — pharynx; Pl — platysma; SPM — stylopharyngeal muscle; St — sternum; SLA/SLN — superior laryngeal artery/nerve; STM — sternothyroid muscle; TC — thyroid cartilage; TG — thyroid gland.
Figure 2. Retropharyngeal overview for the comparison of both sides. Insertion of the superior muscular belly (#) of the sternopharyngeal muscle to form part of the superior constrictor pharyngeal muscle (red triangle). The inferior section of the muscle has been lifted and retracted to the lateral side; Ph — pharynx; GPN — glossopharyngeal nerve; GH — greater horn of the hyoid bone; SPM — stylopharyngeal muscle; Fm — foramen magnum.

DISCUSSION

A small morphological study in an Indian population with 18 cadavers showed that 27.8% of the specimens had SCM variations with three unilateral and two bilateral presentations [23]. A different study describes a strap-like muscle originating from the middle third of the clavicle inserting at the transverse process of the C3 vertebra [20]. The level of cervical attachments of these cleidocervical (levator claviculae) muscles can, however, vary from atlas to the 6th cervical vertebra as reported in a literature survey by Obate et al. [17] on 2012. In another study with computed tomography scans, this muscle was identified in 6 subjects out of 300 subjects, which makes the prevalence of this muscle of about 2% [22]. A unique variation has been reported in our study. An accessory muscular branch from the sternal head split into anterior and posterior fascicles. Since the posterior fascicle of this muscular branch was attached to ECA, a muscular contraction during any movement of the head could have possible traction to this artery inferiorly. Any symptomatic consequence to this arterial traction cannot be followed back; however, the inferior looping of ECA was detected which could be a possible anatomical result of continuous traction during the development. The anterior fascicle ran in front of cLA/FA and built another thin muscular belly. This muscle ran upwards towards the posterior and lateral side of the pharynx and merged into the right superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Since the glossopharyngeal nerve penetrated this superior belly of the sternopharyngeal muscular branch, we assume that this nerve should be responsible for the innervation of the superior muscular belly. However, the inferior belly would be rather distant from the glossopharyngeal nerve, hence it would be more appropriate to be innervated by the accessory nerve. Unfortunately, we cannot prove this hypothesis in this case report. Finally, we propose a proper nomenclature for this variation as a sternopharyngeal branch of the SCM. Even though two fascicles of this muscular branch were observed, we assume that they resulted from splitting of a single muscle during the embryological development. The muscular fibres close to the ECA could have mal-attached to the artery. The pulsating behaviour of the artery could have split the muscle away from its original position. This hypothesis, however, has not been proven yet and would obviously need further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript reports a unique case of right sided unilateral muscular variation derived from the sternal head of the SCM ultimately merging into the right superior constrictor pharyngeal muscle. Such anatomical variation has never been reported before. Therefore, we propose the nomenclature of this variational structure as a sternopharyngeal branch of the SCM. This novel discovery broadens the spectrum of SCM variations and help surgeons or physicians to understand the possible anatomy of neck while accessing the anterior triangle of the neck for any clinical purposes.

Acknowledgements

We are very thankful to the body donors for their contribution to the academic teaching and research field of anatomy.

Conflict of interest: None declared

REFERENCES

  1. Amorim Júnior AA, Lins C, Cardoso A, et al. Variation in clavicular origin of sternocleidomastoid muscle. Int J Morphol. 2010; 28(1): 97–98, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022010000100013.
  2. Anil A, Yaşar YK, Anil F, et al. Variation of bilateral multiheaded sternocleidomastoid muscle. Gazi Med J. 2017; 28(1): 56–57, doi: 10.12996/gmj.2017.17.
  3. Arquez HF. Muscular variation in the neck region with narrowing of the minor and major supraclavicular fossa. Int Arch Med. 2017; 10, doi: 10.3823/2478.
  4. Cherian S, Nayak S. A rare case of unilateral third head of sternocleidomastoid muscle. Int J Morphol. 2008; 26(1): 99–101, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022008000100017.
  5. Fujita T. The smaller occipital nerve, its topographic relation to the trapezius-sternocleidomastoideus muscle system. A consideration on the factors determining the course of a nerve. Okajimas Folia Anat Jap. 1959; 33(4): 217–224, doi: 10.2535/ofaj1936.33.4_217.
  6. Fulmali D, Thute P, Keche H, et al. Variant sternocleidomastoid with extra clavicular head: a case report. J Evolut Med Dent Sci. 2020; 9(43): 3258–3260, doi: 10.14260/jemds/2020/715.
  7. Fulzele RR, Reddy A. Accessory clavicular head of sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report. Sch J Med Case Rep. 2015; 3(98): 865–867.
  8. Heo YR, Kim JW, Lee JH. Variation of the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report of three heads and an accessory head. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42(6): 711–713, doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02388-4, indexed in Pubmed: 31768700.
  9. Kaur D, Jain M, Shukla L. Six heads of origin of sternocleidomastoid muscle: a rare case. Int J Med Update EJOURNAL. 2013; 8: 62–64.
  10. Kim SY, Jang HB, Kim J, et al. Bilateral four heads of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(7): 871–873, doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1397-0, indexed in Pubmed: 25422097.
  11. Kohan EJ, Wirth GA. Anatomy of the neck. Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41(1): 1–6, doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2013.09.016, indexed in Pubmed: 24295343.
  12. Mansoor SN, Rathore FA. Accessory clavicular sternocleidomastoid causing torticollis in an adult. Prog Rehabil Med. 2018; 3: 20180006, doi: 10.2490/prm.20180006, indexed in Pubmed: 32789231.
  13. Mehta V, Arora J, Kumar A, et al. Bipartite clavicular attachment of the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report. Anat Cell Biol. 2012; 45(1): 66–69, doi: 10.5115/acb.2012.45.1.66, indexed in Pubmed: 22536555.
  14. Metz H, Bannister RG, Murray-Leslie RM, et al. Kinking of the internal carotid artery. Lancet. 1961; 277(7174): 424–426, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)90004-6.
  15. Natsis K, Asouchidou I, Vasileiou M, et al. rare case of bilateral supernumerary heads of sternocleidomastoid muscle and its clinical impact. Folia Morphol. 2009; 68(1): 52–54, indexed in Pubmed: 19384831.
  16. Nayak SR, Krishnamurthy A, Sj MK, et al. A rare case of bilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle variation. Morphologie. 2006; 90(291): 203–204, doi: 10.1016/s1286-0115(06)74507-6, indexed in Pubmed: 17432052.
  17. Odate T, Kawai M, Iio K, et al. Anatomy of the levator claviculae, with an overview and a literature survey. Anat Sci Int. 2012; 87(4): 203–211, doi: 10.1007/s12565-012-0148-8, indexed in Pubmed: 22923186.
  18. Oh JS, Kim CE, Kim J, et al. Bilateral supernumerary clavicular heads of sternocleidomastoid muscle in a Korean female cadaver. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019; 41(6): 699–702, doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02227-6, indexed in Pubmed: 30919044.
  19. Pu Q, Huang R, Brand-Saberi B. Development of the shoulder girdle musculature. Dev Dyn. 2016; 245(3): 342–350, doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24378, indexed in Pubmed: 26676088.
  20. Raikos A, Paraskevas G, Triaridis S, et al. Bilateral supernumerary sternocleidomastoid heads with critical narrowing of the minor and major supraclavicular fossae: clinical and surgical implications. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(3): 927–933, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022012000300027.
  21. Ramesh Rao T, Vishnumaya G, Prakashchandra S, et al. Variation in the origin of sternocleidomastoid muscle: a case report. Int J Morphol. 2007; 25(3): 621–623, doi: 10.4067/s0717-95022007000300025.
  22. Rubinstein D, Escott EJ, Hendrick LL. The prevalence and CT appearance of the levator claviculae muscle: a normal variant not to be mistaken for an abnormality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20(4): 583–586, indexed in Pubmed: 10319965.
  23. Saha A, Mandal S, Chakraborty S, et al. Morphological study of the attachment of sternocleidomastoid muscle. Singapore Med J. 2014; 55(1): 45–47, doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013215, indexed in Pubmed: 24241357.
  24. Sarikcioglu L, Donmez BO, Ozkan O. Cleidooccipital muscle: an anomalous muscle in the neck region. Folia Morphol. 2001; 60(4): 347–349, indexed in Pubmed: 11770348.
  25. Theis S, Patel K, Valasek P, et al. The occipital lateral plate mesoderm is a novel source for vertebrate neck musculature. Development. 2010; 137(17): 2961–2971, doi: 10.1242/dev.049726, indexed in Pubmed: 20699298.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl