open access

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)
Original article
Submitted: 2021-04-16
Accepted: 2021-06-29
Published online: 2021-07-21
Get Citation

Type and location of flexor hallucis longus musculotendinous junctions and its tendinous interconnections with flexor digitorum longus tendon: pertinent data for tendon harvesting and transfer

P. Wan-ae-loh1, T. Huanmanop2, S. Agthong2, V. Chentanez2
·
Pubmed: 34308543
·
Folia Morphol 2022;81(3):766-776.
Affiliations
  1. Medical Science Programme, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  2. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

open access

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2021-04-16
Accepted: 2021-06-29
Published online: 2021-07-21

Abstract

Background: Anatomy of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) is essential for the achievement of tendon transfer and several procedures performed in the foot and ankle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical knowledge of FHL including the type and location of musculotendinous junction (MTJ), tendinous interconnections (TIC) morphology, its location related to Master Knot of Henry (MKH), and the pattern of TIC distribution.
Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty-six legs from 52 embalmed and 31 soft cadavers were assessed. The medial (MB) and lateral (LB) bellies of FHL were identified and traced until the end of the most distal muscle fibre to determine the medial and lateral MTJs. MTJ was classified into four types based on the existence and length of MB and LB: type 1, long LB and shorter MB; type 2, equal length of both bellies; type 3, only LB and no MB; type 4, long MB and shorter LB. Low lying muscle belly was defined as muscle extending beyond the zero point (the point of intersection between distal osseous part of tibia and FHL tendon). The distance between MTJ and zero point was measured. TIC was classified into seven types based on the direction and number of slip: type I, one slip from FHL to flexor digitorum longus (FDL); type II, crossed connection: type III, one slip from FDL to FHL; type IV, no connection; type V, two slip from FHL to FDL; type VI, two slip from FHL to FDL and one slip from FDL to FHL; type VII, two slips from FDL to FHL and one slip from FHL to FDL. The distance between the TIC and MKH was measured. TIC distribution was defined into four types based on slip distribution to lesser toes: type a, distributed to second toe; type b, distributed to second and third toes; type c, distributed to second to fourth toes, and type d, distributed to second to fifth toes.
Results: Type 1 and type 3 of MTJ morphology were found in 87.3% and 12.7%, respectively. Low lying LB was detected in 66.13% of cases with a mean distance of 13.10 ± 4.51 mm. All MBs ended proximal to the zero point with a mean distance of –21.99 ± 13.21 mm. Three types of TIC (I, II, V) were identified. The highest frequency was type I (82.93%). In addition, a new type of TIC was depicted in 8.53% of cases. Part of the FHL tendon in this type fused with FDL tendon and the rest extended directly to the first toe. TIC could be located either proximal, distal or at the MKH. The highest prevalence was distal to MKH in 51.67% of cases with a mean distance of 11.23 ± 5.13 mm and 8.73 ± 4.2 mm in low lying and non-low-lying groups, respectively. Four types of slip distribution to lesser toes were defined, mostly in type b. No statistically significant differences were detected among all parameters including genders, sides, and groups.
Conclusions: Knowledge of this investigation might enhance the clinical efficacy of tendon harvesting and transfer in foot and ankle surgery.

Abstract

Background: Anatomy of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) is essential for the achievement of tendon transfer and several procedures performed in the foot and ankle. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical knowledge of FHL including the type and location of musculotendinous junction (MTJ), tendinous interconnections (TIC) morphology, its location related to Master Knot of Henry (MKH), and the pattern of TIC distribution.
Materials and methods: One hundred and sixty-six legs from 52 embalmed and 31 soft cadavers were assessed. The medial (MB) and lateral (LB) bellies of FHL were identified and traced until the end of the most distal muscle fibre to determine the medial and lateral MTJs. MTJ was classified into four types based on the existence and length of MB and LB: type 1, long LB and shorter MB; type 2, equal length of both bellies; type 3, only LB and no MB; type 4, long MB and shorter LB. Low lying muscle belly was defined as muscle extending beyond the zero point (the point of intersection between distal osseous part of tibia and FHL tendon). The distance between MTJ and zero point was measured. TIC was classified into seven types based on the direction and number of slip: type I, one slip from FHL to flexor digitorum longus (FDL); type II, crossed connection: type III, one slip from FDL to FHL; type IV, no connection; type V, two slip from FHL to FDL; type VI, two slip from FHL to FDL and one slip from FDL to FHL; type VII, two slips from FDL to FHL and one slip from FHL to FDL. The distance between the TIC and MKH was measured. TIC distribution was defined into four types based on slip distribution to lesser toes: type a, distributed to second toe; type b, distributed to second and third toes; type c, distributed to second to fourth toes, and type d, distributed to second to fifth toes.
Results: Type 1 and type 3 of MTJ morphology were found in 87.3% and 12.7%, respectively. Low lying LB was detected in 66.13% of cases with a mean distance of 13.10 ± 4.51 mm. All MBs ended proximal to the zero point with a mean distance of –21.99 ± 13.21 mm. Three types of TIC (I, II, V) were identified. The highest frequency was type I (82.93%). In addition, a new type of TIC was depicted in 8.53% of cases. Part of the FHL tendon in this type fused with FDL tendon and the rest extended directly to the first toe. TIC could be located either proximal, distal or at the MKH. The highest prevalence was distal to MKH in 51.67% of cases with a mean distance of 11.23 ± 5.13 mm and 8.73 ± 4.2 mm in low lying and non-low-lying groups, respectively. Four types of slip distribution to lesser toes were defined, mostly in type b. No statistically significant differences were detected among all parameters including genders, sides, and groups.
Conclusions: Knowledge of this investigation might enhance the clinical efficacy of tendon harvesting and transfer in foot and ankle surgery.

Get Citation

Keywords

flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus, musculotendinous junction, tendinous interconnection

About this article
Title

Type and location of flexor hallucis longus musculotendinous junctions and its tendinous interconnections with flexor digitorum longus tendon: pertinent data for tendon harvesting and transfer

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 81, No 3 (2022)

Article type

Original article

Pages

766-776

Published online

2021-07-21

Page views

4487

Article views/downloads

1469

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2021.0068

Pubmed

34308543

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2022;81(3):766-776.

Keywords

flexor hallucis longus
flexor digitorum longus
musculotendinous junction
tendinous interconnection

Authors

P. Wan-ae-loh
T. Huanmanop
S. Agthong
V. Chentanez

References (33)
  1. Alhaug OK, Berdal G, Husebye EE, et al. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. A retrospective study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 25(5): 630–635.
  2. Amlang M, Rosenow MC, Friedrich A, et al. Direct plantar approach to Henry's knot for flexor hallucis longus transfer. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33(1): 7–13.
  3. Beger O, Elvan Ö, Keskinbora M, et al. Anatomy of Master Knot of Henry: a morphometric study on cadavers. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018; 52(2): 134–142.
  4. Cerrato R, Campbell J. Tenodesis and transfer procedures for peroneal tears and tendinosis. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2009; 8(3): 119–125.
  5. Corte-Real NM, Moreira RM, Guerra-Pinto F. Arthroscopic treatment of tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33(12): 1108–1112.
  6. Coull R, Flavin R, Stephens MM. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer: evaluation of postoperative morbidity. Foot Ankle Int. 2003; 24(12): 931–934.
  7. Edama M, Kubo M, Onishi H, et al. Anatomical study of toe flexion by flexor hallucis longus. Ann Anat. 2016; 204: 80–85.
  8. Hahn F, Meyer P, Maiwald C, et al. Treatment of chronic achilles tendinopathy and ruptures with flexor hallucis tendon transfer: clinical outcome and MRI findings. Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29(8): 794–802.
  9. Hamilton WG. Stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon and posterior impingement upon the os trigonum in ballet dancers. Foot Ankle. 1982; 3(2): 74–80.
  10. Herbst SA, Miller SD. Transection of the medial plantar nerve and hallux cock-up deformity after flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for Achilles tendinitis: case report. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27(8): 639–641.
  11. Hirota K, Watanabe K, Saito Y, et al. Flexor hallucis longus tendon branch test: Development and validation of a new method to assess anatomical variation of the tendinous slip. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 26(6): 607–613.
  12. Hirota K, Watanabe K, Teramoto A, et al. Flexor hallucis longus tendinous slips and the relationship to toe flexor strength. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021; 27(8): 851–854.
  13. Hockenbury R, Sammarco G. Medial sliding calcaneal osteotomy with flexor hallucis longus transfer for the treatment of posterior tibial tendon insufficiency. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2001; 6(3): 569–581.
  14. Hur MS, Kim JH, Woo JS, et al. An anatomic study of the quadratus plantae in relation to tendinous slips of the flexor hallucis longus for gait analysis. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(6): 768–773.
  15. LaRue BG, Anctil EP. Distal anatomical relationship of the flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27(7): 528–532.
  16. Mao H, Shi Z, Wapner KL, et al. Anatomical study for flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer in treatment of Achilles tendinopathy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(6): 639–647.
  17. Mao H, Wang L, Dong W, et al. Anatomical feasibility study of flexor hallucis longus transfer in treatment of Achilles tendon and posteromedial portal of ankle arthroscopy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(9): 1031–1038.
  18. Martin BF. Observations on the muscles and tendons of the medial aspect of the sole of the foot. J Anat. 1964; 98: 437–453.
  19. Michelson J, Dunn L. Tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus: a clinical study of the spectrum of presentation and treatment. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(4): 291–303.
  20. Mulier T, Rummens E, Dereymaeker G. Risk of neurovascular injuries in flexor hallucis longus tendon transfers: an anatomic cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(8): 910–915.
  21. Murphy RL, Womack JW, Anderson T. Technique tip: a new technique for harvest of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31(5): 457–459.
  22. O'Sullivan E, Carare-Nnadi R, Greenslade J, et al. Clinical significance of variations in the interconnections between flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus in the region of the knot of Henry. Clin Anat. 2005; 18(2): 121–125.
  23. Oddy MJ, Flowers MJ, Davies MB. Flexor digitorum longus tendon exposure for flatfoot reconstruction: A comparison of two methods in a cadaveric model. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 16(2): 87–90.
  24. Pichler W, Tesch NP, Grechenig W, et al. Anatomical variations of the flexor hallucis longus muscle and the consequences for tendon transfer. A cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005; 27(3): 227–231.
  25. Plaass C, Abuharbid G, Waizy H, et al. Anatomical variations of the flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus in the chiasma plantare. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(11): 1580–1587.
  26. Rodriguez D, Devos Bevernage B, Maldague P, et al. Tarsal tunnel syndrome and flexor hallucis longus tendon hypertrophy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(7): 829–831.
  27. Sharpe BD, Steginsky BD, Suhling M, et al. Posterior Ankle Impingement and Flexor Hallucis Longus Pathology. Clin Sports Med. 2020; 39(4): 911–930.
  28. Sigvard T, Hansen J. Functional reconstruction of the foot and ankle. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Philadelphia 2000: 422–429.
  29. Vasudha TK, Vani PC, Sankaranarayanan G, et al. Communications between the tendons of flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus: a cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019; 41(12): 1411–1419.
  30. Vega J, Redó D, Savín G, et al. Anatomical variations of flexor hallucis longus tendon increase safety in hindfoot endoscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(6): 1929–1935.
  31. Wan-Ae-Loh P, Danginthawat P, Huanmanop T, et al. Surface localisation of master knot of Henry, in situ and ex vivo length of flexor hallucis longus tendon: pertinent data for tendon harvesting and transfer. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(2): 415–424.
  32. Wapner KL, Hecht PJ, Shea JR, et al. Anatomy of second muscular layer of the foot: considerations for tendon selection in transfer for Achilles and posterior tibial tendon reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(8): 420–423.
  33. Wulker N, Stephens MM, Cracchiolo A. An atlas of foot and ankle surgery. 2nd ed. Talor & Francis, London 2005: 377–386.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl