open access

Vol 81, No 1 (2022)
Original article
Submitted: 2020-11-10
Accepted: 2020-12-28
Published online: 2021-02-09
Get Citation

Morphometric profile in foetuses and evolution of Achilles tendon

A. Waśniewska1, Ł. Olewnik2, M. Polguj1
·
Pubmed: 33577076
·
Folia Morphol 2022;81(1):144-149.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Normal and Clinical Anatomy, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
  2. Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Chair of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

open access

Vol 81, No 1 (2022)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2020-11-10
Accepted: 2020-12-28
Published online: 2021-02-09

Abstract

Background: The Achilles tendon (AT) develops from the merge of the tendinous part of the gastrocnemius (GM) and soleus (SM) muscles. The AT is the structural base for the biomechanical work of the ankle joint. Understanding morphometry of the AT is crucial due to the tendon vulnerability to rupture and damage which requires further surgical repair and management. Despite its clinical significance, data concerning measurements of the AT in human foetuses are scare. The aim of our study was to assess the AT, GM and SM morphometry in human foetuses.
Materials and methods: Thirty-seven spontaneously-aborted human foetuses (17 male, 20 female) aged 18–38 weeks of gestation were examined. The morphometry of the GM, SM and AT were evaluated.
Results: No significant correlation between sex or side and size of the AT in human foetuses was observed. The only significant correlation was between sex and the length of the tendon of the SM; in 3rd trimester it was longer in male than in female. In 2nd trimester the SM muscle to tendon ratio was higher in female than in male.
Conclusions: There was no significant correlation between sex or side and size of the AT in human foetuses, probably due to scant muscle load during prenatal period.

Abstract

Background: The Achilles tendon (AT) develops from the merge of the tendinous part of the gastrocnemius (GM) and soleus (SM) muscles. The AT is the structural base for the biomechanical work of the ankle joint. Understanding morphometry of the AT is crucial due to the tendon vulnerability to rupture and damage which requires further surgical repair and management. Despite its clinical significance, data concerning measurements of the AT in human foetuses are scare. The aim of our study was to assess the AT, GM and SM morphometry in human foetuses.
Materials and methods: Thirty-seven spontaneously-aborted human foetuses (17 male, 20 female) aged 18–38 weeks of gestation were examined. The morphometry of the GM, SM and AT were evaluated.
Results: No significant correlation between sex or side and size of the AT in human foetuses was observed. The only significant correlation was between sex and the length of the tendon of the SM; in 3rd trimester it was longer in male than in female. In 2nd trimester the SM muscle to tendon ratio was higher in female than in male.
Conclusions: There was no significant correlation between sex or side and size of the AT in human foetuses, probably due to scant muscle load during prenatal period.

Get Citation

Keywords

foetuses, Achilles tendon, calcaneal tendon, triceps suralis

About this article
Title

Morphometric profile in foetuses and evolution of Achilles tendon

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 81, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Original article

Pages

144-149

Published online

2021-02-09

Page views

5687

Article views/downloads

1114

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2021.0013

Pubmed

33577076

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2022;81(1):144-149.

Keywords

foetuses
Achilles tendon
calcaneal tendon
triceps suralis

Authors

A. Waśniewska
Ł. Olewnik
M. Polguj

References (31)
  1. Aerts P, D'Août K, Thorpe S, et al. The gibbon's Achilles tendon revisited: consequences for the evolution of the great apes? Proc Biol Sci. 2018; 285(1880).
  2. Ballal MS, Walker CR, Molloy AP. The anatomical footprint of the Achilles tendon: a cadaveric study. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(10): 1344–1348.
  3. Boyle E, Mahon V, Diogo R. Muscles lost in our adult primate ancestors still imprint in us: on muscle evolution, development, variations, and pathologies. Current Molecular Biology Reports. 2020; 6(2): 32–50.
  4. Calleja M, Connell DA. The Achilles tendon. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010; 14(3): 307–322.
  5. Dayton P. Anatomic, vascular, and mechanical overview of the achilles tendon. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017; 34(2): 107–113.
  6. Diogo R, Siomava N, Gitton Y. Development of human limb muscles based on whole-mount immunostaining and the links between ontogeny and evolution. Development. 2019; 146(20).
  7. Ferrero EM, Pastor JF, De Paz FF. Primates: Classification, Evolution and Behavior. In: Hughes E, Hill M (eds). Nova Science Publishers 2012: 1–70.
  8. Gourdine-Shaw MC, Lamm BM, Herzenberg JE, et al. Equinus deformity in the pediatric patient: causes, evaluation, and management. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010; 27(1): 25–42.
  9. Järvinen TAH, Kannus P, Maffulli N, et al. Achilles tendon disorders: etiology and epidemiology. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005; 10(2): 255–266.
  10. Kearns CF, Isokawa M, Abe T. Architectural characteristics of dominant leg muscles in junior soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 85(3-4): 240–243.
  11. Latiff S, Bidmos MA, Olateju OI. Morphometric profile of tendocalcaneus of South Africans of European ancestry using a cadaveric approach. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(1): 196–203.
  12. Malvankar S, Khan WS. Evolution of the Achilles tendon: The athlete's Achilles heel? Foot (Edinb). 2011; 21(4): 193–197.
  13. Muraoka T, Muramatsu T, Fukunaga T, et al. Elastic properties of human Achilles tendon are correlated to muscle strength. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005; 99(2): 665–669.
  14. O'Brien M. The anatomy of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005; 10(2): 225–238.
  15. Olewnik Ł, Gonera B, Kurtys K, et al. A proposal for a new classification of the fibular (lateral) collateral ligament based on morphological variations. Ann Anat. 2019; 222: 1–11.
  16. Olewnik Ł, Karauda P, Gonera B, et al. Intramuscular innervation of plantaris muscle evaluated using a modified Sihler's staining protocol - Proposal for a new classification. Ann Anat. 2020; 230: 151504.
  17. Olewnik Ł, Kurtys K, Gonera B, et al. Proposal for a new classification of plantaris muscle origin and its potential effect on the knee joint. Ann Anat. 2020; 231: 151506.
  18. Olewnik Ł, Wysiadecki G, Podgórski M, et al. The plantaris muscle tendon and its relationship with the Achilles tendinopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 9623579.
  19. Olewnik Ł, Wysiadecki G, Polguj M, et al. Anatomic study suggests that the morphology of the plantaris tendon may be related to Achilles tendonitis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017; 39(1): 69–75.
  20. Olewnik Ł, Zielinska N, Karauda P, et al. A three-headed plantaris muscle: evidence that the plantaris is not a vestigial muscle? Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42(10): 1189–1193.
  21. Olewnik Ł, Zielinska N, Paulsen F, et al. A proposal for a new classification of soleus muscle morphology. Ann Anat. 2020; 232: 151584.
  22. Pang BSF, Ying M. Sonographic measurement of achilles tendons in asymptomatic subjects: variation with age, body height, and dominance of ankle. J Ultrasound Med. 2006; 25(10): 1291–1296.
  23. Park SY, Khemani D, Nelson AD, et al. Rectal gas volume measured by computerized tomography identifies evacuation disorders in patients with constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(4): 543–552.e4.
  24. Patel NN, Labib SA. The achilles tendon in healthy subjects: an anthropometric and ultrasound mapping study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 57(2): 285–288.
  25. Pichler W, Tesch NP, Grechenig W, et al. Anatomic variations of the musculotendinous junction of the soleus muscle and its clinical implications. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(4): 444–447.
  26. Schepsis AA, Jones H, Haas AL. Achilles tendon disorders in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30(2): 287–305.
  27. Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(23): 2136–2143.
  28. Szaro P, Witkowski G, Smigielski R, et al. Fascicles of the adult human Achilles tendon - an anatomical study. Ann Anat. 2009; 191(6): 586–593.
  29. van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, et al. Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(5): 835–841.
  30. Weinfeld SB. Achilles tendon disorders. Med Clin North Am. 2014; 98(2): 331–338.
  31. Ying M, Yeung E, Li B, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the size of achilles tendon: the effect of exercise and dominance of the ankle. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003; 29(5): 637–642.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl