Vol 80, No 1 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2020-09-16

open access

Page views 1470
Article views/downloads 1578
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Morphometric analysis and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the long bones of femoral and crural regions in Van cats

O. Yilmaz1, İ. Demircioğlu2
Pubmed: 32964410
Folia Morphol 2021;80(1):186-195.

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to determine the morphometric features and to make the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the images obtained by computed tomography (CT) of the main long bones (femur, tibia, fibula) in Van cats, and to reveal the biometric differences between these measurement values of both sexual dimorphism and homotypic variations.

Materials and methods: A total of 16 adult Van cats, 8 male and 8 female, were used in the study. The pelvic limb long bones of the cats, which were anesthetized with the ketamine-xylazine combination, were scanned with a CT device and their images were obtained. These images were converted to a 3D structure by means of MIMICS 20.1 (The Materialise Group, Leuven, Belgium) software programme. Then, morphometric, volumetric, surface arae measurements of these bones were calculated and statistical analyses were performed.

Results: In the analysis, it was observed that right greatest length (GL), left GL, right greatest length from caput ossis femoris (GLc), left greatest breadth of the distal end (Bd), right volume (V), and left V measurement values of the femur; left GL1, right greatest breadth of the proximal end (Bp), right Bd, left Bd, right smallest breadth of the diaphysis (SD), right V, left V, and right surface area (SA) measurement values of the tibia; right V, left V, right SA, and left SA measurement values of the fibula were statistically significantly higher in male cats than in female cats (p < 0.05). The volume and surface area measurement values of the femur, tibia and fibula of male and female cats were determined as 8.57 ± 1.33 cm3 and 7.00 ± 0.49 cm3, 64.28 ± 6.72 cm2 and 59.42 ± 4.72 cm2; 7.56 ± 1.28 cm3 and 6.15 ± 0.52 cm3, 56.89 ± 6.47 cm2 and 52.72 ± 3.15 cm2; 1.10 ± 0.17 cm3 and 0.83 ± 0.05 cm3, 14.18 ± 1.61 cm2 and 11.95 ± 0.48 cm2, respectively.

Conclusions: The statistical differences between the sexes in terms of the measurement parameters of the femur, tibia and fibula in adult Van cats were determined. We believe that these differences can be used in determining morphological variations of Van cats. In addition, it is thought that the data obtained from the present study would be beneficial to veterinary physicians in the clinical application areas in order to evaluate the pathological conditions related to these bones and to the studies in the field of zooarchaeology.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ajayi IE, Shawulu JC, Zachariya TS, et al. Osteomorphometry of the bones of the thigh, crus and foot in the New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ital J Anat Embryol. 2012; 117(3): 125–134.
  2. Alpak H, Onar V, Mutuş R. The relationship between morphometric and long bone measurements of the Morkaraman sheep. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2009; 33(3): 199–207.
  3. Atalar Ö, Özdemir D. Macro-anatomical investigatios on the skeletons of marten (Martes fonia). II. Ossa Membri Pelvini. Fırat Univ J Health Sci. 2002; 16: 233–236.
  4. Bahadır A, Yıldız H. Veteriner Anatomi: Hareket Sistemi & İç Organlar. Ezgi Kitabevi Bursa, Turkey 2014.
  5. Boonsri B, Pitakarnnop T, Buddhachat K, et al. Can feline (Felis catus) flat and long bone morphometry predict sex or skull shape? Anat Sci Int. 2019; 94(3): 245–256.
  6. Cak B. Turkish Van Cat and Turkish Angora Cat: A Review. J Agric Sci Technol A. 2017; 7(3): 151–159.
  7. Campbell KE, Marcus L. The relationships of hindlimb bone dimensions to body weight in birds. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles Co Sci Ser. 1992; 36: 395–412.
  8. Carew RM, Morgan RM, Rando C. A preliminary investigation into the accuracy of 3D modeling and 3D printing in forensic anthropology evidence reconstruction. J Forensic Sci. 2019; 64(2): 342–352.
  9. Casteleyn C, Bakker J, Breugelmans S, et al. Anatomical description and morphometry of the skeleton of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Lab Anim. 2012; 46(2): 152–163.
  10. Çevik-Demirkan A, Özdemir V, Türkmenoğlu İ, et al. Anatomy of the hind limb skeleton of the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera). Acta Veterinaria Brno. 2007; 76(4): 501–507.
  11. Dayan MO, Beşoluk K, Eken E, et al. Three-dimensional modelling of the femur and humerus in adult male guinea pigs (guinea pig) with computed tomography and some biometric measurement values. Folia Morphol. 2019; 78(3): 588–594.
  12. Demircioglu I, Gezer Ince N. Three-dimensional modelling of computed tomography images of limb bones in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Anat Histol Embryol. 2020; 49(6): 695–707.
  13. Demircioğlu İ, Kirbaş Doğan G, Aksünger Karaavci F, et al. Three-dimensional modelling and morphometric investigation of computed tomography images of brown bear's (Ursus arctos) ossa cruris (Zeugopodium). Folia Morphol. 2020; 79(4): 811–816.
  14. Dursun N. Veterinary anatomy I. Medisan Publisher, Ankara, Turkey 2008.
  15. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of veterinary anatomy, 4th ed. Saunders Elsevier Inc., Missouri, United States 2010: 490–500.
  16. El-Ghazali HM, El-Behery EI. Comparative morphological interpretations on the bones of the pelvic limb of New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and domestic cat (Felis domestica). J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2018; 5(4): 410–419.
  17. Imai N, Funayama K, Suzuki H, et al. Stature estimation formulae based on bony pelvic dimensions and femoral length. Homo. 2020; 71(2): 111–119.
  18. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004; 230(3): 619–628.
  19. Karan M. Macro-anatomical study of ossa membri pelvini in the feral pigs (Sus scrofa). Firat Univ Vet J Hlth Sci. 2012; 26: 31–34.
  20. Kumaş M, Ayaz D. Age determination and long bone histology in Stellagama stellio (Linnaeus, 1758 ) ( Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae ) populations in Turkey. Vertebr Zool. 2014; 64(1): 113–126.
  21. Lee UY, Kim IB, Kwak DS. Sex determination using discriminant analysis of upper and lower extremity bones: New approach using the volume and surface area of digital model. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; 253: 135.e1–135.e4.
  22. Mahakkanukrauh P, Khanpetch P, Prasitwattanseree S, et al. Stature estimation from long bone lengths in a Thai population. Forensic Sci Int. 2011; 210(1-3): 279.e1–279.e7.
  23. Martín-Serra A, Figueirido B, Palmqvist P. A three-dimensional analysis of the morphological evolution and locomotor behaviour of the carnivoran hind limb. BMC Evol Biol. 2014; 14: 129.
  24. Monchot H, Gendron D. Disentangling long bones of foxes (Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus) from arctic archaeological sites. J Archaeol Sci. 2010; 37(4): 799–806.
  25. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. International committee on veterinary gross anatomical nomenclature (ICVGAN), Published by the Editorial Committee, Hannover, 2017.
  26. Ohlerth S, Scharf G. Computed tomography in small animals--basic principles and state of the art applications. Vet J. 2007; 173(2): 254–271.
  27. Olude MA, Olopade JO, Mustapha OA. Macro-anatomical investigations of the skeletons of the African giant rat (Cricetomys gambianus Waterhouse): Pelvic limb. Eur J Anat. 2009; 13(3): 127–131.
  28. Onar V, Belli O. Estimation of shoulder height from long bone measurements on dogs unearthed from the Van-Yoncatepe early Iron Age necropolis in Eastern Anatolia. Rev Med Vet (Toulouse). 2005; 156(1): 53–60.
  29. Onwuama KT, Ojo SA, Hambolu JO, et al. Macro-anatomical and morphometric studies of the hindlimb of grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus, Temminck-1827). Anat Histol Embryol. 2018; 47(1): 21–27.
  30. Ozgel O, Aykut M. Macroanatomical investigation on the ossa membri pelvini of Anatolian bobcat, Lynx lynx. Pakistan J Zool. 2015; 47(5): 1492–1494.
  31. Özdemir D, Atalar Ö. Macro-anatomical investigations on the skeletons of squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). II. Ossa Membri Pelvini. Fırat Univ J Health Sci. 2003; 17: 151–154.
  32. Özdemir D, Karan M. Macroanatomical investigations on the skeletons of badger (Meles meles). II.Ossa membri pelvini. Fırat Univ J Health Sci. 2001; 15: 397–400.
  33. Özkadif S, Varlik A, Kalaycı İ, et al. Morphometric evaluation of chinchillas (Chinchilla lanigera) femur with different modelling techniques. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2016; 22(6): 945–951.
  34. Özkan ZE. Macro-anatomical investigations on the hind limb skeleton of mole-rat (Spalax leucodon Nordmann). Vet Arhiv . 2002a; 72: 159–166.
  35. Özkan ZE. Macro-anatomical investigations on the skeletons of hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus L.) II Ossa membri pelvini . Vet Arhiv . 2002b; 72: 213–220.
  36. Pazvant G, Kahvecioğlu KO. Studies on homotypic variation of forelimb and hindlimb long bones of rabbits. J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2009; 35: 23–39.
  37. Pazvant G, Kahvecioğlu KO. Studies on homotypic variations of forelimb and hindlimb long bones of guinea pigs. J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2013; 39: 20–32.
  38. Polly PD. Limbs in Mammalian Evolution. In: Fins into Limbs. Evolution, development and transformation, Chapter 15, Hall BK (ed.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2007: 245–268.
  39. Prokop M. General principles of MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 45(Suppl 1): S4–10.
  40. Saber A, K. B. Some morphological and radiological studies on the pelvic limb skeleton of Lumholtz Tree-Kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzii). Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 2019; 12(1): 19–34.
  41. Salinas P, Arenas-Caro A, Núñez-Cook S, et al. Morphometric, anatomic and radiographic study of bone of the pelvic limb of endangered patagonian huemul deer (hippocamelus bisulcus). Int J Morphol. 2020; 38(3): 747–754.
  42. Saulsman B, Oxnard CE, Franklin D. Long bone morphometrics for human from non-human discrimination. Forensic Sci Int. 2010; 202(1-3): 110.e1–110.e5.
  43. Shahar R, Milgram J. Morphometric and anatomic study of the hind limb of a dog. Am J Vet Res. 2001; 62(6): 928–933.
  44. Von Den Driesch A. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites. Peabody Museum Bulletin 1. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 1976.
  45. Wisner ER, Zwingenberger AL. Atlas of small animal CT and MRI. Willey-Blackwell Publishing, USA 2015: 40–68.
  46. Yilmaz O, Soyguder Z, Yavuz A, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic examination of pelvic cavity in Van Cats and its morphometric investigation. Anat Histol Embryol. 2020; 49(1): 60–66.
  47. Yilmaz O, Soyguder Z, Yavuz A. Three-dimensional investigation by computed tomography of the clavicle and scapula in van cats. Van Vet J. 2020; 31(1): 34–41.
  48. Yilmaz O. Three-dimensional investigation by computed tomography of the forelimb skeleton in van cats. Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, Department of Anatomy, Van, Turkey 2018.
  49. Yilmaz S, Dinç G, Aydın A. Macro-Anatomical Investigations on the Skeletons of Porcupine (Hystrix Cristata) II. Ossa Membri Pelvini. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 1999; 23(3): 297–300.