Vol 80, No 1 (2021)
Case report
Published online: 2020-02-13

open access

Page views 1433
Article views/downloads 1402
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The sphenozygomatic fissure

M. C. Rusu1, F. Pop1, M. Săndulescu1
Pubmed: 32073134
Folia Morphol 2021;80(1):219-221.

Abstract

The lateral (temporal) wall of the orbit separates it from the temporal fossa and the anterior part of the temporal muscle. Within this wall, the sphenozygomatic suture joins the greater wing of the sphenoid bone and the zygomatic bone. We retrospectively documented in cone-beam computed tomography the anatomy of the orbit in a 56-year-old female and we found a previously unreported anatomic variant. The greater wing of the sphenoid bone and the zygomatic bone were separated, bilaterally, by a large unossified space which we termed the sphenozygomatic fissure. This was merged inferiorly with the inferior orbital fissure. A possible imbalanced mechanism of membranous ossification of both the zygomatic bone and the orbital surface of the greater wing could be speculated as a possible cause for such sphenozygomatic fissure. This previously undocumented anatomic variant is of high clinical relevance, since it may allow orbital fat to herniate (or bulge) toward the temporal fossa, it may be easily damaged during minor trauma and it should be carefully approached during the surgery of the orbit through the lateral wall.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Bendersky DC, Landriel FA, Ajler PM, et al. Sternberg's canal as a cause of encephalocele within the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus: A report of two cases. Surg Neurol Int. 2011; 2: 171.
  2. Bergman RA, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Loukas M. Bergman's comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey 2016.
  3. Dollfus H, Verloes A. Dysmorphology and the orbital region: a practical clinical approach. Survey of Ophthalmology. 2004; 49(6): 547–561.
  4. Gray H, Standring S, Anand N, Birch R, Collins P, Crossman A, Gleeson M, Jawaheer G, Smith AL, Spratt JD, Stringer MD, Tubbs SR, Tunstall R, Wein AJ, Wigley CB. Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 41 ed. Elsevier, London, UK 2016.
  5. Hegde S, Praveen B, Shetty S. Morphological and radiological variations of mandibular condyles in health and diseases: a systematic review. Dentistry. 2013; 3(1).
  6. Lang J. Skull base and related structures: Atlas of clinical anatomy. Schattauer, Verlag 2001.
  7. Maliborski A, Różycki R. Diagnostic imaging of the nasolacrimal drainage system. Part I. Radiological anatomy of lacrimal pathways. Physiology of tear secretion and tear outflow. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20: 628–638.
  8. Rusu MC, Dincă D. Accessory pterygoid fovea of the human mandibular condyle. Cranio. 2019 [Epub ahead of print]: 1–5.
  9. Rusu MC, Sava CJ, Ilie AC, et al. Agger nasi cells versus lacrimal cells and uncinate bullae in cone-beam computed tomography. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019; 98(6): 334–339.
  10. Tawfik HA, Dutton JJ. Embryologic and fetal development of the human orbit. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 34(5): 405–421.
  11. Villalonga JF, Sáenz A, Revuelta Barbero JM, et al. Surgical anatomy of the orbit. A systematic and clear study of a complex structure. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2019; 30(6): 259–267.
  12. Zhang Q, Wang H, Udagawa J, et al. Morphological and morphometric study on sphenoid and basioccipital ossification in normal human fetuses. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2011; 51(3): 138–148.