open access

Vol 78, No 4 (2019)
Original article
Submitted: 2018-12-25
Accepted: 2019-02-07
Published online: 2019-03-13
Get Citation

A light and electron microscopy study of the yak placentome

T. Xu12, B. Liu3, Y. Cui1, J. He1, J. Fan12, S. Yu2
·
Pubmed: 30888682
·
Folia Morphol 2019;78(4):818-826.
Affiliations
  1. Academic of Veterinary Medicine, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
  2. Technology and Research Centre of Gansu Province for Embryonic Engineering of Bovine and Sheep and Goat, Lanzhou, China
  3. College of Life Science and Resources and Environment, Yichun University, Yichun, China

open access

Vol 78, No 4 (2019)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2018-12-25
Accepted: 2019-02-07
Published online: 2019-03-13

Abstract

Background and Materials and methods: In order to clarify and reveal the morphological characteristics of yak placentomes, placentomes obtained from 151 to 180 days of pregnant yaks were observed using light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy.

Results: The results indicated that sessile, dome-shaped yak placentomes seemed to have a relatively complex villous-crypt architecture pattern. There was a straight maternal plate beneath the placentome. Plentiful uterine glands and a dense cellular layer were present in the endometrium lamina propria close to the maternal plate. Trophoblast giant cells appeared to have similar ultrastructure features to these in other ruminants, including abundant mitochondria, an extensive array of rough endoplasmic reticulum, advanced Golgi complex and many specific secretory granules. Trophoblast giant cells could also secrete neutral and acid glycoconjugates. Furthermore, numerous glycoconjugates were distributed in the connective zones between mononuclear trophoblast cells and crypt epithelial cells as well as in maternal connective tissues. Mononucleate trophoblast cells, which had abundant microvilli that interdigitated with the corresponding microvilli arising from the crypt epithelial cells, had numerous mitochondria and vesicles, but there were no glycoconjugates.

Conclusions: The morphological structures of yak placentomes were similar to those of other bovid genera; however, certain differences were observed. These findings might provide morphological evidence for evolutionary relationships between different bovid genera.

Abstract

Background and Materials and methods: In order to clarify and reveal the morphological characteristics of yak placentomes, placentomes obtained from 151 to 180 days of pregnant yaks were observed using light microscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy.

Results: The results indicated that sessile, dome-shaped yak placentomes seemed to have a relatively complex villous-crypt architecture pattern. There was a straight maternal plate beneath the placentome. Plentiful uterine glands and a dense cellular layer were present in the endometrium lamina propria close to the maternal plate. Trophoblast giant cells appeared to have similar ultrastructure features to these in other ruminants, including abundant mitochondria, an extensive array of rough endoplasmic reticulum, advanced Golgi complex and many specific secretory granules. Trophoblast giant cells could also secrete neutral and acid glycoconjugates. Furthermore, numerous glycoconjugates were distributed in the connective zones between mononuclear trophoblast cells and crypt epithelial cells as well as in maternal connective tissues. Mononucleate trophoblast cells, which had abundant microvilli that interdigitated with the corresponding microvilli arising from the crypt epithelial cells, had numerous mitochondria and vesicles, but there were no glycoconjugates.

Conclusions: The morphological structures of yak placentomes were similar to those of other bovid genera; however, certain differences were observed. These findings might provide morphological evidence for evolutionary relationships between different bovid genera.

Get Citation

Keywords

yak, placentome, microstructure, ultrastructure, histochemistry

About this article
Title

A light and electron microscopy study of the yak placentome

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 78, No 4 (2019)

Article type

Original article

Pages

818-826

Published online

2019-03-13

Page views

992

Article views/downloads

852

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0030

Pubmed

30888682

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2019;78(4):818-826.

Keywords

yak
placentome
microstructure
ultrastructure
histochemistry

Authors

T. Xu
B. Liu
Y. Cui
J. He
J. Fan
S. Yu

References (29)
  1. Abd-Elnaeim MMM, Miglino MA, Pfarrer C, et al. Microvascular architecture of the fetal cotyledons in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) during different stages of pregnancy. Ann Anat. 2003; 185(4): 325–334.
  2. Björkman NH. Light and electron microscopic studies on cellular alterations in the normal bovine placentome. Anat Rec. 1969; 163(1): 17–29.
  3. Cui Y, Yu SJ. An anatomical study of the internal genital organs of the yak at different ages. Vet J. 1999; 157(2): 192–196.
  4. Farin PW, Crosier AE, Farin CE. Influence of in vitro systems on embryo survival and fetal development in cattle. Theriogenology. 2001; 55(1): 151–170.
  5. Gagioti S, Scavone C, Bevilacqua E. Participation of the mouse implanting trophoblast in nitric oxide production during pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 2000; 62(2): 260–268.
  6. Guillomot M, Guay P. Ultrastructural features of the cell surfaces of uterine and trophoblastic epithelia during embryo attachment in the cow. Anat Rec. 1982; 204(4): 315–322.
  7. Hafez ESE, Hafez B. Reproduction in farm animals. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins., Philadelphia 2000.
  8. Hoffmann B, Schuler G. The bovine placenta; a source and target of steroid hormones: observations during the second half of gestation. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2002; 23(1-2): 309–320.
  9. Klisch K, Pfarrer C, Schuler G, et al. Tripolar acytokinetic mitosis and formation of feto-maternal syncytia in the bovine placentome: different modes of the generation of multinuclear cells. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1999; 200(2): 229–237.
  10. Knechtel C. Brunstverhalten beim Kaffernbuffel (Syncerus caffer caffer) im Tierpark Berlin Friedrichsfelde. Zool Gart. 1993; 63: 32–58.
  11. Lee SJ, Talamantes F, Wilder E, et al. Trophoblastic giant cells of the mouse placenta as the site of proliferin synthesis. Endocrinology. 1988; 122(5): 1761–1768.
  12. Leiser R, Krebs C, Klisch K, et al. Fetal villosity and microvasculature of the bovine placentome in the second half of gestation. J Anat. 1997; 191 (Pt 4): 517–527.
  13. Leiser R, Pfarrer C, Abd-Elnaeim M, et al. Feto-maternal anchorage in epitheliochorial and endotheliochorial placental types studied by histology and microvascular corrosion casts. Trophoblast Research. 1998; 12: 21–39.
  14. Matamoros RA, Caamano L, Lamb SV, et al. Estrogen production by bovine binucleate and mononucleate trophoblastic cells in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1994; 51(3): 486–492.
  15. Miglino MA, Pereira FTV, Visintin JA, et al. Placentation in cloned cattle: structure and microvascular architecture. Theriogenology. 2007; 68(4): 604–617.
  16. Njogu A, Owiti GO, Persson E, et al. Ultrastructure of the chorioallantoic placenta and chorionic vesicles of the lesser bush baby (Galago senegalensis). Placenta. 2006; 27(6-7): 771–779.
  17. Qian F. Livestock embryology. China Science and Culture Press, Hong Kong 2003.
  18. Schlafer DH, Fisher PJ, Davies CJ. The bovine placenta before and after birth: placental development and function in health and disease. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 60(4): 145–160.
  19. Schmidt S, Gerber D, Soley JT, et al. Histo-morphology of the uterus and early placenta of the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and comparative placentome morphology of the African buffalo and cattle (Bos taurus). Placenta. 2006; 27(8): 899–911.
  20. Simmons DG, Fortier AL, Cross JC. Diverse subtypes and developmental origins of trophoblast giant cells in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2007; 304(2): 567–578.
  21. Wango EO, Heap RB, Wooding FB. Progesterone and 5 beta-pregnanediol production by isolated fetal placental binucleate cells from sheep and goats. J Endocrinol. 1991; 129(2): 283–289.
  22. Weiler-Guettler H, AirdW C, Rayburn H. Developmentally regulated gene expression of thrombomodulin in postimplantanion mouse embryos. Development. 1996; 122(7): 2271–2281.
  23. Wimsatt WA. Observations on the morphogenesis, cytochemistry, and significance of the binocleate giant cells of the placenta of ruminants. Am J Anat. 1951; 89(2): 233–281.
  24. Wooding FB. Current topic: the synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. Placenta. 1992; 13(2): 101–113.
  25. Wooding FBP, Kimura J, Fukuta K, et al. A light and electron microscopical study of the Tragulid (mouse deer) placenta. Placenta. 2007; 28(10): 1039–1048.
  26. Wooding FBP, Roberts RM, Green JA. Light and electron microscope immunocytochemical studies of the distribution of pregnancy associated glycoproteins (PAGs) throughout pregnancy in the cow: possible functional implications. Placenta. 2005; 26(10): 807–827.
  27. Yamada O, Todoroki J, Kizaki K, et al. Expression of prolactin-related protein I at the fetomaternal interface during the implantation period in cows. Reproduction. 2002; 124(3): 427–437.
  28. Yotsumoto S, Shimada T, Cui CY, et al. Expression of adrenomedullin, a hypotensive peptide, in the trophoblast giant cells at the embryo implantation site in mouse. Dev Biol. 1998; 203(2): 264–275.
  29. Yu SJ, Huang YM, Chen BX. Reproductive patterns of the yak. I. Reproductive phenomena of the female yak. Br Vet J. 1993; 149(6): 579–583.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl