open access

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)
CASE REPORTS
Published online: 2019-01-23
Submitted: 2018-11-26
Accepted: 2019-01-10
Get Citation

Juxtaoral organ: an anatomical finding to be considered

V. Ramos-Vega, I. Roa
DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0008
·
Pubmed: 30687914
·
Folia Morphol 2019;78(3):643-646.

open access

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)
CASE REPORTS
Published online: 2019-01-23
Submitted: 2018-11-26
Accepted: 2019-01-10

Abstract

The juxtaoral organ (JOO) is a vestigial anatomical structure which is not usually described in lectures and classic texts of general histology and oral histology, despite it being included in the “Terminologia Histologica: International terms for human cytology and histology”. Although there is evidence about its histological structure, there are no macroscopic anatomical reports about it. We report the finding of a structure of glandular macroscopic appearance in a horizontal section of a plastinated human head belonging to the Morphology Laboratory of the Department of Biomedical Basic Sciences at the University of Talca. Due to its location, dimensions and anatomical relations, we determined it to be the JOO. Using a digital calliper, we measured the anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of the JOO and observed its anatomical relationships with neighbouring structures of clinical relevance. We conclude that the JOO is relevant to surgical practice due to its anatomical relations with relevant structures such as inferior third molar and lingual nerve. Its clinical application lies in the differential diagnosis with invasive processes of malignant neoplasia originating in the oral cavity.

Abstract

The juxtaoral organ (JOO) is a vestigial anatomical structure which is not usually described in lectures and classic texts of general histology and oral histology, despite it being included in the “Terminologia Histologica: International terms for human cytology and histology”. Although there is evidence about its histological structure, there are no macroscopic anatomical reports about it. We report the finding of a structure of glandular macroscopic appearance in a horizontal section of a plastinated human head belonging to the Morphology Laboratory of the Department of Biomedical Basic Sciences at the University of Talca. Due to its location, dimensions and anatomical relations, we determined it to be the JOO. Using a digital calliper, we measured the anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of the JOO and observed its anatomical relationships with neighbouring structures of clinical relevance. We conclude that the JOO is relevant to surgical practice due to its anatomical relations with relevant structures such as inferior third molar and lingual nerve. Its clinical application lies in the differential diagnosis with invasive processes of malignant neoplasia originating in the oral cavity.

Get Citation

Keywords

diagnostic errors; differential diagnosis; mouth neoplasms; juxtaoral organ

About this article
Title

Juxtaoral organ: an anatomical finding to be considered

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 78, No 3 (2019)

Pages

643-646

Published online

2019-01-23

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2019.0008

Pubmed

30687914

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2019;78(3):643-646.

Keywords

diagnostic errors
differential diagnosis
mouth neoplasms
juxtaoral organ

Authors

V. Ramos-Vega
I. Roa

References (28)
  1. Brannon RB, Fowler CB. Intraneural epithelial islands associated with a periapical granuloma: a cause for concern? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61(6): 725–728.
  2. Bommanavar SB, Hema KN, Baad R. Juxtaoral organ of Chievitz: An innocuous organ to be known. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017; 21(1): 162–164.
  3. Cheng E, Cohen MA, Scognamiglio T. Neuroepithelial structure resembling the juxtaoral organ of chievitz: usual morphology in an unusual location. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016; 24(8): 721–722.
  4. Chievitz JH. Chievitz juxtaparotid organ, free from cancer. Arch Anat Physiol. 1885; 9: 401–436.
  5. D'Andrea V, Malinovsky L, Biancari F, et al. The Chievitz juxtaparotid organ. G Chir. 1999; 20(5): 213–217.
  6. Danforth RA, Baughman RA. Chievitz's organ: a potential pitfall in oral cancer diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979; 48(3): 231–236.
  7. Dibal N, Garba S, Jacks T. Plastinates: Possible Tool for Medical Education in the Near Future: Mini Review. Res Dev Med Educ. 2018; 7(1): 3–7.
  8. Grüneberg H. Exocrine glands and the Chievitz organ of some mouse mutants. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1971; 25(2): 247–261.
  9. Ide F, Mishima K, Saito I. Juxtaoral organ of Chievitz presenting clinically as a tumour. J Clin Pathol. 2003; 56(10): 789–790.
  10. Ito M, Nakashima M, Yoshioka M, et al. Organogenesis of the juxta-oral organ in mice. J Anat. 2009; 215(4): 452–461.
  11. Kusafuka K, Kameya T. Juxtaoral organ of Chievitz, radiologically suspicious for invasion of lingual squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Int. 2007; 57(11): 754–756.
  12. Lutman GB. Epithelial nests in intraoral sensory nerve endings simulating perineural invasion in patients with oral carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 1974; 61(2): 275–284.
  13. Mandl L, Nerlich A, Pankratz H, et al. [The juxta-oral organ (Chievitz organ)--a sensory organ in the bucco-temporal area?]. Pathologe. 1993; 14(4): 205–209.
  14. Mérida-Velasco JR, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, de la Cuadra-Blanco C, et al. Morphogenesis of the juxtaoral organ in humans. J Anat. 2005; 206(2): 155–163.
  15. Mikó T, Molnár P. The juxtaoral organ: a pitfall for pathologists. J Pathol. 1981; 133(1): 17–23.
  16. Mills SE, Gaffey MJ, Frierson HF, et al. Tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract and ear. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. 2000: 372–373.
  17. Müller E, Zenker W. Enzyme-histochemistry of the juxtaoral organ in man ("organ of Chievitz"). Histochemistry. 1981; 71(2): 279–290.
  18. Ottone NE, Baptista CAC, Latorre R, et al. E12 sheet plastination: Techniques and applications. Clin Anat. 2018; 31(5): 742–756.
  19. Palazzolo MJ, Fowler CB, Magliocca KR, et al. Neuroepithelial structures associated with the subepithelial nerve plexus of taste buds: a fortuitous finding resembling the juxtaoral organ of Chievitz. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 117(4): 497–501.
  20. Pantanowitz L, Balogh K. Significance of the juxtaoral organ (of Chievitz). Head Neck. 2003; 25(5): 400–405.
  21. Ramachar SM, Huliyappa HA. Accessory parotid gland tumors. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 2(1): 90–93.
  22. Ramsay A. Persistence of the organ of chievitz in the human. Anat Rec. 1935; 63(3): 281–293.
  23. Roşu Ş, Neamţu C, Totolici B. Unusual lesion of the temporal region, benign tumor of the Chievitz's organ: a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014; 55(2 Suppl): 683–685.
  24. Sancheti SM, Sawaimoon S, Zameer MA. Juxtaoral Organ of Chievitz, an Obscure Anatomical Structure Masquerading as Perineural Invasion of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: Case Report and Review of Literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2015; 23(6): 461–463.
  25. Sil Ki, Hak Ki, Ho Ch, et al. Juxtaoral Organ of Chievitz: A Case Report. Korean J Pathol. 2005; 39: 265–268.
  26. Tschen JA, Fechner RE. The juxtaoral organ of Chievitz. Am J Surg Pathol. 1979; 3(2): 147–150.
  27. Zenker W. Organon bucco-temporale (Chievitzsches Organ), ein nervös epitheliales Organ beim Menschen. Anat Anz. 1953; 100: 257–265.
  28. Zenker W. Die nervö sen Elemente des Chievitzschen Organs. Verh Anat Ges. 1959; 56: 249–258.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl