Vol 78, No 1 (2019)
Original article
Published online: 2018-07-06

open access

Page views 3067
Article views/downloads 1778
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Evaluation of the anatomical measurements of the temporomandibular joint by cone-beam computed tomography

M. Ocak1, M. F. Sargon2, K. Orhan3, B. Bilecenoğlu1, F. Geneci4, M. B. Uzuner5
Pubmed: 30009364
Folia Morphol 2019;78(1):174-181.

Abstract

Background: To examine the detailed anatomy of the normal temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in a large series of patients divided into different age groups. 

Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 100 patients included in the study. Morphometric analysis regarding mandibular con- dyle and mandibular fossa, articular tubercle and the zygomatic arch was done. The volumetric and surface measurements of mandibular condyles (total tissue volume [TV], total bone volume [BV], bone surface area [BS] and percentage of bony tissue of the mandibular condyle [BV/TV]) were also measured. 

Results: Statistical analysis was performed and statistically significant differences according to the side of the joint, sex, and age groups were reported. Additionally, correlations between aging and all of these parameters were also determined. 

Conclusions: TV, BV, BS and BV/TV parameters according to side, age, and sex groups were defined for normal TMJ which may help to understand the onset and progress of TMJ disorders. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ghristiansen E, Chan T, Thompson J, et al. Computed tomography of the normal temporomandibular joint. Eur J Oral Sci. 1987; 95(6): 499–509.
  2. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(6): 803–811.
  3. Ikeda K, Kawamura A, Ikeda R. Assessment of optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes with limited cone-beam computed tomography. J Prosthodont. 2011; 20(6): 432–438.
  4. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, et al. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res. 1990; 8(6): 833–842.
  5. Moss ML, Salentijn L. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1969; 55(6): 566–577.
  6. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 6 edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, St. Louis 2008.
  7. Orhan K, Seki U, Rozylo-Kalinowska I. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical signs of temporomandibular joint disorders: a 10-year research update review. Oral Radiology. 2017; 33(2): 81–91.
  8. Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Akhlaghian M, et al. Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction? J Dent (Shiraz). 2016; 17(2): 134–141.
  9. Sargon MF. Anatomi akıl notları. Güneş Tıp Kitapevleri 2016: Ankara.
  10. Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences 2015.
  11. Sümbüllü MA, Cağlayan F, Akgül HM, et al. Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(3): 234–240.
  12. Ueki K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, et al. The effects of changing position and angle of the proximal segment after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(10): 1041–1047.
  13. Ueki K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, et al. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012; 40(8): 821–827.
  14. Winkler S, Dalkowski K, Mair J, Klebe S, Waschke J, Böckers TM, Paulsen F. Sobotta lehrbuch anatomie. Elsevier Health Sciences Germany 2015.
  15. Zhang YL, Song JL, Xu XC, et al. Morphologic analysis of the temporomandibular joint between patients with facial asymmetry and asymptomatic subjects by 2D and 3D evaluation: a preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(13): e3052.