open access

Vol 78, No 1 (2019)
Original article
Submitted: 2018-04-20
Accepted: 2018-05-23
Published online: 2018-06-21
Get Citation

Examination of inclinations of the spine at childhood and adolescence

A. Tokpınar1, H. Ülger2, S. Yılmaz1, N. Acer2, T. Ertekin3, S. B. Görkem4, H. Güler1
·
Pubmed: 30009371
·
Folia Morphol 2019;78(1):47-53.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey
  2. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
  3. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
  4. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

open access

Vol 78, No 1 (2019)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Submitted: 2018-04-20
Accepted: 2018-05-23
Published online: 2018-06-21

Abstract

Background: Spine is a column that consists of consecutively lined up vertebras. It includes medulla spinalis. It contributes the motions of head, neck and body. Spine is not a straight column. There is a convexity towards the front of the spine (lordosis) at cervical and lumbar areas in adults and a convexity towards the back of the spine (kyphosis) at thoracic and sacral spine areas. 

Materials and methods: In this study, lateral magnetic resonance images of 731 children between 1 and 16 years of age were examined and their cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles were measured with Cobb method using ImageJ programme for every age group. 

Results: The mean calculated cervical lordosis angles in 1–16-year-old children were found to be 20.51o ± 6.11o (minimum 17.96o ± 6.29o, maximum 23.50o ± ± 4.14o). It has been observed that cervical angle values decrease with age. The mean thoracic kyphosis angle measured was 28.71o ± 6.99o (minimum 24.55o ± ± 5.65o, maximum 30.44o ± 4.68o). Lumbar lordosis angle was 28.08o ± 7.39o (minimum 20.36o ± 6.59o, maximum 32.68o ± 6.03o). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angle values increased with age. In our study, a statistical differ- ence was found in increasing thoracic kyphosis angle between 1-year-old group and 14-year-old group. Statistical difference was also found in decreasing cervical lordosis angle value between 1-year-old group and 16-year-old group. When we compare our study results with literature values, cervical lordosis values were similar, but lumbar lordosis values were lower. 

Conclusions: In summary, we think that knowing sagittal plane inclinations of the spine developing in childhood and adolescence will contribute to earlier de- termination of pathologies. We also hope that it will contribute to clinical stages and other studies in this field. 

Abstract

Background: Spine is a column that consists of consecutively lined up vertebras. It includes medulla spinalis. It contributes the motions of head, neck and body. Spine is not a straight column. There is a convexity towards the front of the spine (lordosis) at cervical and lumbar areas in adults and a convexity towards the back of the spine (kyphosis) at thoracic and sacral spine areas. 

Materials and methods: In this study, lateral magnetic resonance images of 731 children between 1 and 16 years of age were examined and their cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles were measured with Cobb method using ImageJ programme for every age group. 

Results: The mean calculated cervical lordosis angles in 1–16-year-old children were found to be 20.51o ± 6.11o (minimum 17.96o ± 6.29o, maximum 23.50o ± ± 4.14o). It has been observed that cervical angle values decrease with age. The mean thoracic kyphosis angle measured was 28.71o ± 6.99o (minimum 24.55o ± ± 5.65o, maximum 30.44o ± 4.68o). Lumbar lordosis angle was 28.08o ± 7.39o (minimum 20.36o ± 6.59o, maximum 32.68o ± 6.03o). Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angle values increased with age. In our study, a statistical differ- ence was found in increasing thoracic kyphosis angle between 1-year-old group and 14-year-old group. Statistical difference was also found in decreasing cervical lordosis angle value between 1-year-old group and 16-year-old group. When we compare our study results with literature values, cervical lordosis values were similar, but lumbar lordosis values were lower. 

Conclusions: In summary, we think that knowing sagittal plane inclinations of the spine developing in childhood and adolescence will contribute to earlier de- termination of pathologies. We also hope that it will contribute to clinical stages and other studies in this field. 

Get Citation

Keywords

spine; radiography; kyphosis; lordosis

About this article
Title

Examination of inclinations of the spine at childhood and adolescence

Journal

Folia Morphologica

Issue

Vol 78, No 1 (2019)

Article type

Original article

Pages

47-53

Published online

2018-06-21

Page views

2898

Article views/downloads

2220

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2018.0053

Pubmed

30009371

Bibliographic record

Folia Morphol 2019;78(1):47-53.

Keywords

spine
radiography
kyphosis
lordosis

Authors

A. Tokpınar
H. Ülger
S. Yılmaz
N. Acer
T. Ertekin
S. B. Görkem
H. Güler

References (27)
  1. Abelin-Genevois K, Idjerouidene A, Roussouly P, et al. Cervical spine alignment in the pediatric population: a radiographic normative study of 150 asymptomatic patients. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23(7): 1442–1448.
  2. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi, 2.cilt, 4. baskı, Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara. 2006: 58–65.
  3. Bernhardt M, Bridwell K. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine. 1989; 14(7): 717–721.
  4. Boseker EH, Moe JH, Winter RB, et al. Determination of. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000; 20(6): 796–798.
  5. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, et al. The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine. 2005; 30(1): 93–100.
  6. Dere F. Anatomi Atlası ve Ders Kitabı. 5. Baskı, Nobel yayın evi, Adana. 1999: 765–766.
  7. Ecerkale Ö. Postür Analizinde Symmetrigraf ile Orthoröntgenogram Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi, Uzmanlık tezi, Okmeydanı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Kliniği, İstanbul. 2006: 68–80.
  8. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine. 1995; 20(12): 1351–1358.
  9. Harrison DE. Pediatric Cervical Lordosis: Values, Disorders, and Interventions. American Journal of Clinical Chiropractic (AJCC). http://www.chiropractic-biophysics.com/clinical_chiropractic/2011/2/11/pediatric-cervical-lordosis-values-disorders-and-interventio.html.
  10. Hasday CA, Passoff TL, Perry J. Gait abnormalities arising from latrogenic loss of lumbar lordosis secondary to Harrington instrumentation in lumbar fractures. Spine. 1983; 8(5): 501–511.
  11. Itoi E. Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine. 1991; 16(7): 750–756.
  12. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine. 1994; 19(14): 1611–1618.
  13. Kasai T, Ikata T, Katoh S, et al. Growth of the cervical spine with special reference to its lordosis and mobility. Spine. 1996; 21(18): 2067–2073.
  14. Kostuik JP, Hall BB. Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine. 1983; 8(5): 489–500.
  15. Köse N, Sevencan A. Konjenital skolyoz ve torasik yetmezlik sendromu, Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği Dergisi. 2007; 6: 3–4.
  16. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Hecquet J, et al. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(2): 99–103.
  17. Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR, et al. Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine. 2004; 29(15): 1642–1647.
  18. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Roussouly P. Pediatric sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5: 586–590.
  19. McAviney J. Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005; 28: 187–193.
  20. Moore KL, Persaud TVN. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 5th edition. Philadelphia 1998: 354–360.
  21. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(3): 320–327.
  22. Okçu G, Yercan H, Yorulmaz İ. Lomber Omurganın Sagittal Planda Radyolojik Analizi. 2000: 146–150.
  23. Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine. 1996; 21(13): 1530–1535.
  24. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine. 1982; 7(4): 335–342.
  25. Unur E, Ülger H, Ekinci N. Anatomi, 3. Baskı, Kıvılcım Kitapevi, Kayseri. 2009: 13–17.
  26. Voutsinas SA, MacEwen GD. Sagittal profiles of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986(210): 235–242.
  27. Wiltse LL, Winter RB. Terminology and measurement of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65(6): 768–772.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, faks: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl