Vol 77, No 3 (2018)
Original article
Published online: 2017-12-28

open access

Page views 1534
Article views/downloads 1800
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The relationship between frontal sinus morphology and skeletal maturation

S. K. Buyuk1, H. Simsek2, A. Karaman1
Pubmed: 29297181
Folia Morphol 2018;77(3):503-508.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between frontal sinus morphology and hand-wrist bone maturation by using postero-anterior (PA) cephalometric radiographs.
Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 220 patients divided into 11 groups based on the hand-wrist radiographs. The right and left maximum height, width and area of the frontal sinus parameters were measured in PA cephalometric radiographs of 220 subjects aged 8–18 years. The hand-wrist skeletal maturation stages were evaluated on the hand-wrist radiographs using the method of Fishman. The Kendall tau-b values were analysed to evaluate the correlation between the hand-wrist skeletal maturation stages and the frontal
sinus parameters.
Results: The right and left frontal sinus areas and widths were found to be larger in males than in females (p < 0.05). In males, a significant difference was observed in all frontal sinus parameters in different maturation stages (p < 0.001), while a statistically significant correlation was found in females between the left frontal sinus area, right frontal sinus height, right frontal sinus width and different maturation stages (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The relationship between frontal sinus dimensions obtained from PA cephalometric radiographs and hand-wrist maturation stages suggests that frontal sinuses can be used in determining growth and development.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Brown WA, Molleson TI, Chinn S. Enlargement of the frontal sinus. Ann Hum Biol. 1984; 11(3): 221–226.
  2. Camacho-Basallo P, Yáñez-Vico RM, Solano-Reina E, et al. Five radiographic methods for assessing skeletal maturity in a Spanish population: is there a correlation? Acta Odontol Scand. 2017; 75(2): 106–112.
  3. Camargo JR, Daruge E, Prado FB, et al. The frontal sinus morphology in radiographs of Brazilian subjects: its forensic importance. Braz J Morphol Sci. 2007; 24: 239–243.
  4. Cross DL, McDonald JP. Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on skeletal, dental, and nasal structures: a postero-anterior cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22(5): 519–528.
  5. da Silva RF, Prado FB, Caputo IG, et al. The forensic importance of frontal sinus radiographs. J Forensic Leg Med. 2009; 16(1): 18–23.
  6. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982; 52(2): 88–112, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1982)052<0088:REOSM>2.0.CO;2.
  7. Flores-Mir C, Burgess CA, Champney M, et al. Correlation of skeletal maturation stages determined by cervical vertebrae and hand-wrist evaluations. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(1): 1–5.
  8. Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74(1): 118–124, doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0118:UOSMBO>2.0.CO;2.
  9. Gagliardi A, Winning T, Kaidonis J, et al. Association of frontal sinus development with somatic and skeletal maturation in Aboriginal Australians: a longitudinal study. Homo. 2004; 55(1-2): 39–52.
  10. Grave KC, Brown T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1976; 69(6): 611–619.
  11. Kim DI, Lee UY, Park SO, et al. Identification using frontal sinus by three-dimensional reconstruction from computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2013; 58(1): 5–12.
  12. Kjær I, Pallisgaard C, Brock-Jacobsen MT. Frontal sinus dimensions can differ significantly between individuals within a monozygotic twin pair, indicating environmental influence on sinus sizes. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012; 132(9): 988–994.
  13. Mahmood HT, Shaikh A, Fida M. Association between frontal sinus morphology and cervical vertebral maturation for the assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 150(4): 637–642.
  14. Rossouw PE, Lombard CJ, Harris AM. The frontal sinus and mandibular growth prediction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 100(6): 542–546.
  15. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Development of the frontal sinus in relation to somatic and skeletal maturity. A cephalometric roentgenographic study at puberty. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18(5): 491–497.
  16. Trakinienė G, Smailienė D, Kučiauskienė A. Evaluation of skeletal maturity using maxillary canine, mandibular second and third molar calcification stages. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38(4): 398–403.
  17. Yun InS, Kim YO, Lee SK, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of frontal sinus in Asians. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22(2): 462–467.