Vol 76, No 4 (2017)
Original article
Published online: 2017-03-24

open access

Page views 1590
Article views/downloads 1661
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Prevalence and morphometric features of fossa navicularis on cone beam computed tomography in Turkish population

N. Ersan
Pubmed: 28353302
Folia Morphol 2017;76(4):715-719.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence and morphometric features of fossa navicularis, a close radiographic anatomic variation of canalis basilaris medianus of the basiocciput, in a Turkish population, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: The study group consisted of 723 patients (female: 420, male: 303) having CBCT scans. The patients had no syndromes, history of neurological diseases or surgery in the area of interest. On the images that revealed a fossa navicularis, the depth, length, and width measurements were performed, and were compared to the age and gender of the patients. The shape and number of fossa navicularis were also recorded.

Results: Fossa navicularis was identified in 48 (6.6%) patients. Among these patients, 19 were female (4.5% of all female patients), whereas 29 were male (9.6% of all male patients), and their age ranged between 10 and 68 years (mean age: 34.0 ± 18.7). No significant difference was found between genders and age groups in terms of depth, length, and width measurements (p > 0.05). In 39 (5.4%) patients, fossa navicularis presented oval in shape.

Conclusions: Even though the prevalence of fossa navicularis was found to be higher than previously reported, it still seems to be rare. Anatomical structure of the fossa navicularis can be studied effectively on CBCT images.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Beltramello A, Puppini G, El-Dalati G, et al. Fossa navicularis magna. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; 19(9): 1796–1798.
  2. Cankal F, Ugur HC, Tekdemir I, et al. Fossa navicularis: anatomic variation at the skull base. Clin Anat. 2004; 17(2): 118–122.
  3. Collins H. Frequency and distribution of fossa pharyngea in human crania. Am J Physical Anthropol. 1927; 11(1): 101–106.
  4. Currarino G. Canalis basilaris medianus and related defects of the basiocciput. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988; 9(1): 208–211.
  5. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38(6): 609–625.
  6. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106(1): 106–114.
  7. Prabhu SP, Zinkus T, Cheng AG, et al. Clival osteomyelitis resulting from spread of infection through the fossa navicularis magna in a child. Pediatr Radiol. 2009; 39(9): 995–998.
  8. Ray B, Kalthur SG, Kumar B, et al. Morphological variations in the basioccipital region of the South Indian skull. Nepal J Med Scien. 2015; 3(2): 124–128.
  9. Rizzo A. Canale cranio faringeo, fossetta faringea, interparietali e preinterparietali nel cranio umano. Monogr Zool Ital. 1901; 12: 241–252.
  10. Romiti G. La fossetta faringea nell’osso occipitale dell’uomo. AttiSoc Toscana Sci Nat. 1890: 11.
  11. Rossi G. Il canale cranio-faringeo e la fossetta faringea, ricerche antropologiche. Monogr Zool Ital. 1891; 2: 117–122.
  12. Segal N, Atamne E, Shelef I, et al. Intracranial infection caused by spreading through the fossa naviclaris magna - a case report and review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 77(12): 1919–1921.
  13. Syed AZ, Mupparapu M. Fossa navicularis magna detection on cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2016; 46(1): 47–51.